Does agency theory have universal relevance? A reply to Lubatkin, Lane, Collin, and Very

Journal of Organizational Behavior - Tập 28 Số 1 - Trang 81-88 - 2007
Luis R. Gómez‐Mejía1, Robert M. Wiseman2
1Departmemt of Management, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A.
2Department of Management, Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, U.S.A.

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2307/1879431

10.1515/9781400879762-024

10.5465/1556340

Barrick M. R., 1991, The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta‐analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 588

Berle A., 1932, The modern corporation and private property

10.1086/467023

10.2307/258191

10.1086/467037

10.1002/(SICI)1099-1468(199611)17:6<575::AID-MDE778>3.0.CO;2-N

10.2307/3069338

10.2307/259306

Gomez‐Mejia L. R., 1998, Reframing executive compensation: An assessment and outlook, Journal of Management, 23, 291

Hofstede G, 1980, Culture's consequences

10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Khanna T, 2002, Local institutions and global strategy

10.1111/0022-1082.00115

Lubatkin M., An embeddedness framing of governance and opportunism: Towards a cross‐nationally accommodating theory of agency, Journal of Organizational Behavior

Mitnick B. M. (1994).Delegation of specification: An agency theory of organization. Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management Dallas TX.

10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.535

10.2307/2392231

10.1086/467200

Tosi H. L., 1999, Research in personnel and human resource management, 162

10.2307/256600

Web of Science. (2003).ISI Web of Knowledge. Thomsom ISI. [on‐line database]. Available athttp://isi4.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi.

10.2307/259103

Wiseman R. M., 2000, Compensation in organizations, 311

10.2307/3069384