Does a cap on the carbon price have to be a cap on green investments?
Tóm tắt
Policy makers and economists are discussing a regulatory ceiling for carbon prices, acting as a “safety valve” for the protection of regulated businesses from unexpected price surges. While the pros and cons of such a regulatory feature are widely discussed in the literature, the optimal design of such a cap and the attendant economic and environmental consequences have yet to be subjected to quantitative analyses. We employ a Monte Carlo simulation/dynamic programming approach to investigate the impact of different carbon price cap designs on an individual firm in the energy generation industry. Specifically, we model the firm’s choice between a pulverized coal combustion plant and a combined cycle gas turbine plant, a large hydropower plant, a solid biomass plant and an on-shore wind farm. Our results show that the effects of a maximum carbon price set by the regulator is largely independent of its exact characteristics, albeit not of its level. A higher cap favors low-carbon technologies in general. However, due to differences in their cost structures, a price cap has different impacts on the relative attractiveness of the specific alternative technologies investigated.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Brauneis A, Loretz M, Mestel R, Palan S (2011) Inducing low-carbon investment in the electric power industry through a price floor for emissions trading. FEEM Nota di Lavoro No. 74.2011, Milano
Burtraw D, Palmer K, Kahn D (2010) A symmetric safety valve. Energy Policy 38(9):4921–4932. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.068
Celebi M, Graves F (2009) Volatile CO2 prices discourage CCS investment. SSRN No. 1338095. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1338095
European Commission (2008) Energy sources, production costs and performance of technologies for power generation, heating and transport (COM(2008) 744). http://ec.europa.eu/energy/strategies/2008/doc/2008_11_ser2/strategic_energy_review_wd_cost_performance.pdf. Accessed 6 Feb 2012
European Commission (2011) A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. 1–15. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0112:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 29 Feb 2012. Document date 8 March 2011.
Helm D (2008) Credible energy policy. Meeting the challenges of supply and climate change. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/301477760
Jacoby HD, Ellerman AD (2004) The safety valve and climate policy. Energy Policy 32(4):481–491. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00150-2
Mohammadi H (2009) Electricity prices and fuel costs: long-run relations and short-run dynamics. Energy Econ 31:503–509. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.02.001
Roberts MJ, Spence M (1976) Effluent charges and licenses under uncertainty. J Public Econ 5(3–4):193–208. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(76
Szolgayová J, Fuss S, Obersteiner M (2008) Assessing the effects of CO2 price caps on electricity investments. A real options analysis. Energy Policy 36(10):3974–3981. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.006