Does Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Fit Within a Bi-Factor Model of ADHD?

Journal of Attention Disorders - Tập 21 Số 8 - Trang 642-654 - 2017
Annie A. Garner1, James Peugh1, Stephen P. Becker2,1, Kathleen M. Kingery1,3, Leanne Tamm1, Aaron J. Vaughn1, Heather A. Ciesielski1, Jay Simon1, Richard E. A. Loren1, Jeffery N. Epstein4,1
1Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
2Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA
3Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
4Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH USA

Tóm tắt

Objective: Studies demonstrate sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) symptoms to be distinct from inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive dimensions of ADHD. No study has examined SCT within a bi-factor model of ADHD, whereby SCT may form a specific factor distinct from inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity while still fitting within a general ADHD factor, which was the purpose of the current study. Method: A total of 168 children were recruited from an ADHD clinic. Most (92%) met diagnostic criteria for ADHD. Parents and teachers completed measures of ADHD and SCT. Results: Although SCT symptoms were strongly associated with inattention, they loaded onto a factor independent of ADHD g. Results were consistent across parent and teacher ratings. Conclusion: SCT is structurally distinct from inattention as well as from the general ADHD latent symptom structure. Findings support a growing body of research suggesting SCT to be distinct and separate from ADHD.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Achenbach T. M., 2000, Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles

10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

10.1037/a0023961

10.1080/15374416.2012.734259

10.1007/s10802-013-9824-y

10.1097/00004583-199205000-00007

10.1007/s10802-011-9602-7

10.1093/jpepsy/jst058

10.1016/j.psychres.2014.02.007

10.1016/j.jrp.2013.07.001

10.1177/10870547-11435411

10.1007/s10578-013-0372-z

10.1007/s10802-013-9719-y

10.1007/s10802-013-9825-x

10.1007/s10802-014-9866-9

Burns G. L., 2010, Child and Adolescent Disruptive Behavior Inventory–Teacher Version 5.0

10.1111/jcpp.12165

10.1023/A:1025764403506

10.1207/S15374424JCCP3101_14

10.1080/02796015.2004.12086249

Enders C. K., 2010, Applied missing data analysis

10.1177/1087054714527794

10.1097/00004583-199405000-00011

10.1177/1087054708322991

10.1007/s10802-010-9436-8

10.1177/1087054711431456

10.1177/1087054711416310

10.1016/j.ajp.2013.10.009

10.1177/1087054713480034

10.1007/978-1-4614-4018-5

10.1007/BF01447474

10.1023/B:JACP.0000037779.85211.29

10.1097/chi.0b013e318157517a

10.1007/s11336-011-9218-4

Kline R. B., 2011, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3

10.1176/ajp.151.11.1673

10.1007/s10802-013-9722-3

10.1037/a0036276

10.1007/s10802-013-9714-3

10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02232.x

10.1007/s10902-011-9538-y

10.1023/A:1010377530749

10.1007/s10802-013-9801-5

10.1023/A:1005203629968

Muthén L. K., 1998, Mplus user’s guide, 7

10.1007/s10802-011-9584-5

10.1037/a0016600

10.1080/00273171.2012.715555

10.1007/s10802-011-9488-4

10.1007/s12402-012-0091-5

10.1007/s10802-009-0336-y

10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02500.x

10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02549.x

10.1080/09297041003671176

10.1007/s10802-013-9800-6

10.1037/a0027347

10.1080/15374416.2013.850702

10.1023/A:1022673906401

10.1093/jpepsy/jsg046

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Attention Disorders

Tập 21 Số 8

642-654

Thông tin tác giả