Does Platform Owner’s Entry Crowd Out Innovation? Evidence from Google Photos

Information Systems Research - Tập 29 Số 2 - Trang 444-460 - 2018
Jens Foerderer1, Thomas Kude2, Sunil Mithas3, Armin Heinzl1
1Business School, University of Mannheim, 68131 Mannheim, Germany
2ESSEC Business School, 95021 Cergy-Pontoise, France
3Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742; and Muma College of Business, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620

Tóm tắt

We study how platform owners’ decision to enter complementary markets affects innovation in the ecosystem surrounding the platform. Despite heated debates on the behavior of platform owners toward complementors, relatively little is known about the mechanisms linking platform owners’ entry and complementary innovation. We exploit Google’s 2015 entry into the market for photography apps on its own Android platform as a quasi-experiment. We conclude based on our analyses of a time-series panel of 6,620 apps that Google’s entry was associated with a substantial increase in complementary innovation. We estimate that the entry caused a 9.6% increase in the likelihood of major updates for apps affected by Google’s entry, compared to similar but not affected apps. Further analyses suggest that Google’s entry triggered complementary innovation because of the increased consumer attention for photography apps, instead of competitive “racing” or “Red Queen” effects. This attention spillover effect was particularly pronounced for larger and more diversified complementors. The study advances our understanding of the effects of platform owner’s entry, explicates the complex mechanisms that shape complementary innovation, and adds empirical evidence to the debate on regulating platforms.The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0787 .

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/smj.821

10.1287/isre.2013.0505

10.1515/9781400829828

10.1287/mnsc.2014.1930

Barnett WP, 1996, Strategic Management J., 17, 139

10.1287/mnsc.1070.0808

10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

10.1162/003355304772839588

Boudreau K (2017) Amateurs: Low-cost development, market participation and innovation on digital platforms. Working paper, Northeastern University, Boston.

Boudreau K, Jeppesen LB, Miric M (2017) Freemium, network effects and digital competition: Evidence from the introduction of game center on the Apple appstore. Working paper, Northeastern University, Boston.

10.1287/orsc.1110.0678

10.4337/9781849803311.00014

10.1002/smj.2324

Brandenburger AM, 1996, Co-Opetition

10.2307/258850

10.2307/41410417

10.2307/2696397

Cusumano MA, 2002, MIT Sloan Management Rev., 43, 51

de Reuver M, 2017, J. Inform. Tech., 1

10.5465/amj.2008.30708624

10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.10

Eisenmann T, 2006, Harvard Bus. Rev., 84, 92

10.1111/1467-6451.00131

Foerderer J, 2018, Inform. Systems J., 1

10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.12

10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006

Gawer A, 2002, Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation

Gawer A, 2007, J. Econom. Management Strategy, 16, 1, 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00130.x

10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x

10.1257/jep.15.2.25

10.1287/mnsc.1120.1577

10.1093/rfs/hhq053

10.25300/MISQ/2018/13490

10.1287/mnsc.1120.1618

10.1287/isre.2017.0701

10.1007/s11747-016-0487-4

10.1257/jep.8.2.93

10.1109/32.799945

10.1287/mnsc.2016.2502

10.1287/mksc.2014.0886

Long JS, 2006, Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata

10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

10.1109/MITP.2017.3680951

Newton C, 2016, The Verge.

Parker G, 2016, Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy-And How You Can Make Them Work for You

10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.13

10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400

10.1162/154247603322493212

10.1509/jmr.14.0274

10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.14

Swanson EJ, 2015, New York Times

10.5465/amp.2011.0105

10.1287/isre.2015.0573

10.1287/isre.1100.0323

10.1287/orsc.2014.0895

10.1257/aer.104.5.255

10.1287/isre.1100.0322