Liệu sự tham gia vào CNTT&TT có thực sự quan trọng? Một cuộc điều tra về trường hợp của Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ trong PISA 2018

Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2015). Gender and socioeconomic related differences in performance based ICT competences. Computers & Education, 84, 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.017 Aypay, A. (2010). Information and communication technology (ICT) usage and achievement of Turkish students in PISA 2006. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 116–124. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v9i2/9213.pdf Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman. Biagi, F., & Loi, M. (2013). Measuring ICT use and learning outcomes: Evidence from recent econometric studies. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12016 Bragdon, R. A., & Dowler, K. (2016). College student technology use and academic performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(1), 12–22. http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_1_January_2016/2.pdf Bulut, O., & Cutumisu, M. (2018). When technology does not add up: ICT use negatively predicts mathematics and science achievement for Finnish and Turkish students in PISA 2012. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 27(1), 25–42. https://learntechlib.org/primary/p/178514/ Caro, D. H., & Biecek, P. (2017). intsvy: An R package for analysing International large-scale assessment data. Journal of Statistical Software, 81(7), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v081.i07 Chen, Y.-F., & Peng, S. S. (2008). University students’ Internet use and its relationships with academic performance, interpersonal relationships, psychosocial adjustment, and self-evaluation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(4), 467–469. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0128 Chiao, C., & Chiu, C.-H. (2018). The mediating effect of ICT usage on the relationship between students’ socioeconomic status and achievement. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0370-9 Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004813 Drain, T. S., Grier, L. E., & Sun, W. (2012). Is the growing use of electronic devices beneficial to academic performance? Results from archival data and a survey. Issues in Information Systems, 13(1), 225–231. http://iacis.org/iis/2012/50_iis_2012_225-231.pdf Falck, O., Mang, C., & Woessmann, L. (2018). Virtually no effect? Different uses of classroom computers and their effect on student achievement. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12192 Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Gimenez, G., & Calero, J. (2020). Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish autonomous communities. Computers & Education, 157, Article 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969 Gamazo, A., Martínez-Abad, F., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & Jose Rodriguez-Conde, M. (2018). Assessment of factors related to school effectiveness in PISA 2015. A multilevel analysis. Revista de Educacion, 379, 56–84. https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:11b5dc5f-ed60-4d8c-92e5-83a2355c5fb2/03gamazo-pdf.pdf Gök, A. (2014). Current situation, usage, management and integration of the smart classroom technologies within the scope of FATIH Project: A multiple case study [Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey]. METU Library. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12618196/index.pdf Gök, A., & Yildirim, Z. (2015). Investigation of FATIH Project within the scope of teachers, school administrators and YEGITEK administrators’ opinions: A multiple case study. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(2), 487–504. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mersinefd/issue/17397/181967 Gubbels, J., Swart, N. M., & Groen, M. A. (2020). Everything in moderation: ICT and reading performance of Dutch 15-year-olds. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-0079-0 Gumus, S., & Atalmis, E. H. (2011). Exploring the relationship between purpose of computer usage and reading skills of Turkish students: evidence from PISA 2006. Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(3), 129–140. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v10i3/10315.pdf Guo, Q., Qiao, C., & Ibrahim, B. (2022). The mechanism of influence between ICT and students’ science literacy: a hierarchical and structural equation modelling study. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09954-9 Güzeller, C. O., & Akın, A. (2014). Relationship between ICT variables and mathematics achievement based on PISA 2006 database: International evidence. TOJET: Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 184–192. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v13i1/13116.pdf Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. S. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.021 Huang, S., Jiang, Y., Yin, H., & Jong, M.S.-Y. (2021). Does ICT use matter? The relationships between students’ ICT use, motivation, and science achievement in East Asia. Learning and Individual Differences, 86, Article 101957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101957 International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (n.d.). IDB Analyzer. https://www.iea.nl/data-tools/tools Juhaňák, L., Zounek, J., Záleská, K., Bárta, O., & Vlčková, K. (2018). The Relationship between students’ ICT use and their school performance: Evidence from PISA 2015 in the Czech Republic. Orbis Scholae, 12(2), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.292 Kaya, V. H., & İnci, S. (2021). How does information and communications technology influence Turkish students’ science achievement? Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9(18), 754–770. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.900695 Kilis, S., & Balbay, S. (2020). The dance of Clark and Kozma: Perspectives of the ICT teacher candidates. In Ş. Orakcı (Ed.), Paradigm shifts in 21st century teaching and learning (pp. 218–229). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3146-4.ch014 Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban Legends in Education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804395 Looi, C.-K., & Hung, W. L. D. (2004). ICT-in-education policies and implementation in Singapore and other Asian countries. In A. Aviram & J. Richardson (Eds.), Upon What Does the Turtle Stand? (pp. 27–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2799-0_2 Ma, Y., & Qin, X. (2021). Measurement invariance of information, communication and technology (ICT) engagement and its relationship with student academic literacy: Evidence from PISA 2018. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, Article 100982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100982 Machin, S., McNally, S., & Silva, O. (2007). New technology in schools: Is there a payoff? The Economic Journal, 117(522), 1145–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02070.x Malhi, P., Bharti, B., & Sidhu, M. (2016). Use of electronic media and its relationship with academic achievement among school going adolescents. Psychological Studies, 61(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-015-0346-2 Meggiolaro, S. (2018). Information and communication technologies use, gender and mathematics achievement: Evidence from Italy. Social Psychology of Education, 21(2), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9425-7 Meng, L., Qiu, C., & Boyd-Wilson, B. (2019). Measurement invariance of the ICT engagement construct and its association with students’ performance in China and Germany: Evidence from PISA 2015 data. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3233–3251. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12729 Odell, B., Cutumisu, M., & Gierl, M. (2020a). A scoping review of the relationship between students’ ICT and performance in mathematics and science in the PISA data. Social Psychology of Education, 23, 1449–1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09591-x Odell, B., Galovan, A. M., & Cutumisu, M. (2020). The relation between ICT and science in PISA 2015 for Bulgarian and Finnish students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), em1846. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7805 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (n.d.a). PISA 2018 Database. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2018database/ Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (n.d.b). Scaling procedures and construct validation of context questionnaire data. In PISA 2018 Technical report (Chapter 16). https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/pisa2018technicalreport/PISA2018_Technical-Report-Chapter-16-Background-Questionnaires.pdf Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). PISA 2009 Technical Report. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264167872-en Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015a). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015b). The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behaviour, confidence. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229945-en Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). PISA 2015 Technical Report. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2015-technical-report/PISA2015_TechRep_Final.pdf Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). PISA 2015 results in focus. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019a). Country note: Results from PISA 2018. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_TUR.pdf Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019b). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en Özberk, E. H., Kabasakal, K. A., & Öztürk, N. B. (2017). Investigating the factors affecting Turkish students’ PISA 2012 mathematics achievement using hierarchical linear modeling PISA 2012. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32(3), 544–559. http://www.openaccess.hacettepe.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11655/20341/1.pdf?sequence=2 Özkan, B., & Tekeli, F. N. (2021). The effects of information and communication technology engagement factors on science performance between Singapore and Turkey using multi-group structural equation modeling. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(4), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.639 Özkan, U. B. (2022). Predictors of mathematics achievement of students in Turkey: An analysis of the variables of information and communication technologies familiarity. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 54, 272–296. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.845834 Park, S., & Weng, W. (2020). The relationship between ICT-related factors and student academic achievement and the moderating effect of country economic index across 39 countries. Educational Technology & Society, 23(3), 1–15. Petko, D., Cantieni, A., & Prasse, D. (2017). Perceived quality of educational technology matters: A secondary analysis of students’ ICT use, ICT-related attitudes, and PISA 2012 test scores. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(8), 1070–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116649373 Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants’ part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816 Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084 Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10363170 Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.004 South Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2011). Adapting Education to the Information Age: The White Paper for ICT in Education of Korea. http://www.keris.or.kr/english/whitepaper/WhitePaper_eng_2011_wpap.pdf Srijamdee, K., & Pholphirul, P. (2020). Does ICT familiarity always help promote educational outcomes? Empirical evidence from PISA-Thailand. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2933–2970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10089-z Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson. Topuz, A. C., & Göktaş, Y. (2015). Türk eğitim sisteminde teknolojinin etkin kullanımı için yapılan projeler: 1984–2013 dönemi [Projects for effective technology use in Turkish education system: Period of 1984–2013]. International Journal of Informatics Technologies, 8(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.17671/btd.43357 Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2020). Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması [Information and Communication Technology (ICT) usage survey on households and individuals]. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2020-33679 Uzun, A. M., & Kilis, S. (2019). Does persistent involvement in media and technology lead to lower academic performance? Evaluating media and technology use in relation to multitasking, self-regulation and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.045 Willms, J. D., & Smith, T. (2005). A manual for conducting analyses with data from TIMSS and PISA. Report prepared for UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Xiao, Y., Liu, Y., & Hu, J. (2019). Regression analysis of ICT impact factors on early adolescents’ reading proficiency in five high-performing countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 01646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01646 Yang, Z., Barnard-Brak, L., & Siwatu, K. (2019). How does the availability of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) resources mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and achievement? Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 4(3), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-018-0079-x Yurttas Kumlu, G. D., & Doğan, N. (2020). How does the ICT access and sage influence student achievement in PISA 2009 and 2012? Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 11(3), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.581379 Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2016). How does ICT use influence students’ achievements in math and science over time? Evidence from PISA 2000 to 2012. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2431–2449. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1297a