Does Audit Market Concentration Harm the Quality of Audited Earnings? Evidence from Audit Markets in 42 Countries*

Contemporary Accounting Research - Tập 30 Số 1 - Trang 325-355 - 2013
Jere R. Francis1, Paul N. Michas2, Scott E. Seavey3
1University of Missouri-Columbia
2University of Arizona
3University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Tóm tắt

AbstractAudit regulators around the world have expressed concern over market dominance by Big 4 accounting firms and the potential adverse effect it may have on the quality of audited financial statements. We use cross‐country variation in the audit market structure of 42 countries to examine two separate aspects of Big 4 dominance: (1) Big 4 market concentration as a group relative to non–Big 4 auditors; and (2) concentration within the Big 4 group in which one or more of the Big 4 firms is dominant relative to the other Big 4 firms. We find that in countries where the Big 4 (as a group) conduct more listed company audits, both Big 4 and non–Big 4 clients have higher quality audited earnings compared to clients in countries with smaller Big 4 market shares. In contrast, in countries where there is a greater concentration within the Big 4 group, we find that Big 4 clients have lower quality audited earnings compared to countries with more evenly distributed market shares among the Big 4. Thus concentration within the Big 4 group appears to be detrimental to audit quality in a country and of legitimate concern to regulators and policymakers. However, Big 4 dominance per se does not appear to harm audit quality and is in fact associated with higher earnings quality, after controlling for other country characteristics that potentially affect earnings quality.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Accountancy Age, 2011, EU to propose audit‐only firms and mandatory rotation, Accountancy Age

AICPA.2005.Speech by SEC Chairman: Remarks before the 2005 AICPA National Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments. Available online athttp://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch120505cc.htm retrieved February 2010.

10.2307/2491002

10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.593

10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.04.001

10.2308/aud.2007.26.2.143

10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1

10.1108/13581980310810561

10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.05.010

10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01144.x

10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00763.x

10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00017-7

10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.10.005

10.1016/S1573-4412(84)02014-6

10.1506/X478-1075-4PW5-1501

10.2202/1546-5616.1096

Dechow P., 1995, Detecting earnings management, The Accounting Review, 70, 193

10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.07.003

10.2308/accr.2001.76.3.375

10.1086/466752

10.1111/j.0022-2879.2007.00003.x

10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.10.002

10.1111/j.1756-2171.2007.tb00043.x

European Commission.2010.Green paper: Audit policy: Lessons from the crisis. Online athttp://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2010/audit/green_paper_audit_en.pdf retrieved December 2010.

10.2308/ajpt-50006

10.1506/car.25.1.6

10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.71

General Accounting Office.2003.Public accounting firms: Mandated study on consolidation and competition. Available online athttp://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03864.pdf (accessed February 2010).

10.1016/j.aos.2010.01.001

10.2308/accr.2007.82.1.65

Government Accountability Office.2008.Audits of public companies: Continued concentration in audit market for large public companies does not call for immediate action. Available online athttp://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08163.pdf (accessed February 2010).

10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002

10.2307/1913827

10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.004

House of Lords.2010.Call for evidence: Auditors: market concentration and their role. Select Committee on Economic Affairs. Available online at:http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees‐a‐z/lords‐select/economic‐affairs‐committee/news/economic‐affairs‐committee‐publishes‐call‐for‐evidence/(accessed December 2010).

10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.08.006

10.2307/2491047

Kallapur S. S.Sankaragururswamy andY.Zang.2010.Audit market competition and audit quality. Working paper Indian School of Business National University of Singapore and Singapore Management University.

Kaufmann D. A.Kraay andM.Mastruzzi.2009.Governance matters VIII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008. Working paper World Bank Development Research Group.

Kennedy P., 1992, A guide to econometrics

10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002

Krishnan J., 1994, Auditor switching and conservatism, The Accounting Review, 69, 200

10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00268.x

10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.447

10.1086/250042

10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00828.x

10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00121-1

10.1023/A:1025565122721

10.2308/accr-10097

10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.10.002

Oxera.2006.Competition and choice in the U.K. audit market: Prepared for the Department of Trade and Industry and Financial Reporting Council.Oxera Consulting(Oxford UK). Available online athttp://www.frc.org.uk/images/uploaded/documents/Competition%20and%20choice%20in%20the%20UK%20audit%20market1.pdf(accessed February 2010).

Oxera.2007.Ownership rules of audit firms and their consequences for audit market concentration.Oxera Consulting(Oxford UK). Available online athttp://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/auditing/docs/market/oxera_report_en.pdf(accessed February 2010).

PwCIL.2011a.We’re structured as a network of member firms connected through membership in PwC International Limited. PricewaterhouseCoopers. Available online athttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/corporate‐governance/network‐structure.jhtml.

PwCIL.2011b.PricewaterhouseCoopers U.K. home page. Available online athttp://www.pwc.co.uk/.

10.2307/2950521

10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.12.003

Sari N., 2008, Contributions from hospital policy and productivity research, 139

10.1086/260683

10.2307/2098408

10.2307/3003237

Sutton J., 1991, Sunk costs and market structure

United States Treasury.2006.Remarks by Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson on the competitiveness of U.S. capital markets – Economic Club of New York New York NY. Available online athttp://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/hp174.htm(accessed February 2010).

United States Treasury.2008.Advisory committee on the auditing profession: Final report October 6 2008. Available online athttp://www.treas.gov/offices/domestic‐finance/acap/docs/final‐report.pdf(accessed February 2010).

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Contemporary Accounting Research

Tập 30 Số 1

325-355

Thông tin tác giả