Do Common Systems Control Eye Movements and Motion Extrapolation?

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology - Tập 64 Số 7 - Trang 1327-1343 - 2011
Alexis D. J. Makin1, Ellen Poliakoff1
1School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Tóm tắt

People are able to judge the current position of occluded moving objects. This operation is known as motion extrapolation. It has previously been suggested that motion extrapolation is independent of the oculomotor system. Here we revisited this question by measuring eye position while participants completed two types of motion extrapolation task. In one task, a moving visual target travelled rightwards, disappeared, then reappeared further along its trajectory. Participants discriminated correct reappearance times from incorrect (too early or too late) with a two-alternative forced-choice button press. In the second task, the target travelled rightwards behind a visible, rectangular occluder, and participants pressed a button at the time when they judged it should reappear. In both tasks, performance was significantly different under fixation as compared to free eye movement conditions. When eye movements were permitted, eye movements during occlusion were related to participants' judgements. Finally, even when participants were required to fixate, small changes in eye position around fixation (<2°) were influenced by occluded target motion. These results all indicate that overlapping systems control eye movements and judgements on motion extrapolation tasks. This has implications for understanding the mechanism underlying motion extrapolation.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.visres.2004.05.009

10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018675

10.1152/jn.01033.2007

10.1007/PL00005772

10.1007/BF00237843

10.1007/s00221-009-2139-0

10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.051

10.1152/jn.01188.2003

10.1007/s00221-005-0101-3

10.1037/a0011974

10.1152/jn.01056.2002

10.1109/TAC.1963.1105574

10.1016/S0166-4115(04)80013-X

10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.901

10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.552

10.1162/089892903322598184

10.1016/j.visres.2005.12.019

10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.007

10.1006/cogp.1995.1001

10.3102/00346543042003237

10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.047

Hecht H., 2004, Time-to-contact, 1

10.1097/01.opx.0000175563.21423.50

10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.431

10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.021

10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00274-7

10.3758/BF03193829

10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01464-2

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01904.x

10.1016/0001-6918(95)98945-Z

10.1016/j.visres.2008.05.023

10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.010

10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05824.x

10.1113/jphysiol.2007.139881

10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.007

10.1068/p200005

10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00058-8

10.1080/00335558008248231

10.1017/S0140525X02000043

10.1016/0028-3932(87)90041-8

Rizzolatti G., 1994, Attention and performance: XV. Conscious and nonconscious information processing, 231

10.1037/0096-1523.1.4.395

10.1016/j.conb.2005.10.013

10.3758/BF03206510

10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01352-2

10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.48