Diversity in the middle

Journal of Educational Administration - 2013
Stephen E.Anderson1
1Department of Leadership, Higher and Adult Education, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present the author's commentary on the special issue of Journal of Educational Administration entitled “Systemwide reform: examining districts under pressure”.Design/methodology/approachThe major thesis of this commentary and reflection on the preceding papers is that there is a need to recognize that “school districts” as known in the USA are examples of a more general phenomenon of intermediary organizational entities in education systems in North America and elsewhere in the world and that there is a need to problematize, not take for granted, the form, purpose, and influence of these mediating layers of the school system on the quality and improvement of schools, and on the implementation of government policies that are intended to regulate and support education in schools.FindingsThis issue of the Journal of Educational Administration presents a series of papers that highlight different aspects and contemporary trends in school district practice and research – organizational characteristics associated with district effectiveness (see Trujillo this issue), how districts are responding to political and public demands for accountability (see Hamilton et al., this issue), the invention of school district authorities as portfolio managers of diverse school provider systems (see Marsh et al., this issue), and how social communication networks linking school and district staff interface with the use of evidence to support school improvement (see Finnigan and Daly, as well as Wohlstetter and Smith this issue).Originality/valueThe simple thesis of this commentary is to argue that school districts function as an intermediate level of education governance, management, and support within national and state education systems, and that current research and discussion on the school district role in improving and sustaining the quality of education would be strengthened by broadening the scope of research and discussion to alternative kinds of intermediate level governance and support systems that exist in North America and in other regions of the world.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Boyd, W., Christman, J. and Useem, E. (2008), “Radical privatization in Philadelphia: the role of school district leaders as policy entrepreneurs”, in Boyd, W., Kerchner, C. and Blyth, M. (Eds), The Transformation of Great American Schools Districts: How Big Cities are Reshaping Public Education, Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 33‐60.

Boyd, W., Kerchner, C. and Blyth, M. (Eds) (2008), The Transformation of Great American Schools Districts: How Big Cities are Reshaping Public Education, Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 21‐46.

Bryk, A., Sebring, P., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S. and Easton, J. (2010), Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Cambridge, MA.

Buckley, K., Henig, J. and Levin, H. (2010), Politics, Governance, and the New Portfolio Models for Urban School Reform, Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA.

Cawelti, G. and Protheroe, N. (2001), High Student Achievement: How Six School Districts Changed into High‐Performance Systems, Educational Research Service, Arlington, VA.

Datnow, A., Hubbard, L. and Mehan, H. (2002), Extending Educational Reform from One School to Many, RoutledgeFalmer, New York, NY.

Elmore, R. (1993), “The role of local school districts in instructional improvement?”, in Fuhrman, S. (Ed.), Designing Coherent Education Policy: Improving the System, Jossey‐Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA, pp. 96‐124.

Finnigan, K.S., Daly, A.J. and Che, J. (2013), “Systemwide reform in districts under pressure: the role of social networks in defining, acquiring, using, and diffusing research evidence”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 476‐497.

Fruchter, N. (2008), “Plus ça change … mayoral control in New York City?”, in Boyd, W., Kerchner, C. and Blyth, M. (Eds), The Transformation of Great American Schools Districts: How Big Cities are Reshaping Public Education, Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 85‐112.

Giroux, H. (2011), “Business culture and the death of public education: mayor Bloomberg, David Steiner and the politics of corporate leadership”, Policy Futures in Education, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 553‐559.

Greenland, J. (2002), “Evolution in school improvement with the Aga Khan Foundation from 1984 to 2000”, in Anderson, S. (Ed.), Improving Schools Through Teacher Development: Case Studies of the Aga Khan Foundation Projects in East Africa, Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse.

Hamilton, L.S., Schwartz, H.L., Stecher, B.M. and Steele, J.L. (2013), “Improving accountability through expanded measures of performance”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 453‐475.

Hill, R. (2010), “Chain reactions: a think piece on the development of chains of schools in the English school system?”, resource document, National College for Leadership of Schools and Children's Services.

Leithwood, K. and Seashore Louis, K. (Eds), (2011), Linking Leadership to Student Learning, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Louis, K.S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., Anderson, S., Michlin, M., Mascall, B., Gordon, M., Strauss, T., Thomas, E. and Moore, S. (2010), Learning from Districts’ Efforts to Improve Student Achievement: Final Report of Research to the Wallace Foundation, Wallace Foundation, New York, NY.

Louis, K.S., Thomas, E. and Anderson, S. (2010), “How do states influence leadership in small districts”, Leadership and Policy in Schools, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 328‐366.

Marsh, J.A., Strunk, K.O. and Bush, S. (2013), “Portfolio district reform meets school turnaround: early implementation findings from the Los Angeles public school choice initiative”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 498‐527.

Mourshed, M., Chijoke, C. and Barber, M. (2010), How the World's most Improved School Systems Keep Getting Better, McKinsey and Company, London.

Murphy, J. and Datnow, A. (2003), “The development of comprehensive school reform”, in Murphy, J. and Datnow, A. (Eds), Leadership Lessons from Comprehensive School Reform, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 3‐18.

Stringfield, S. (2000), “A synthesis and critique of four recent reviews of whole school reform in the United States”, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 259‐269.

Stringfield, S., Datnow, A., Herman, R. and Berkeley, C. (1997), “Introduction to the Memphis restructuring initiative”, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 3‐35.

Thiessen, D. and Anderson, S. (1999), Getting into the Habit of Change in Ohio Schools: The Cross‐Case Study of 12 Transforming Learning Communities, Ohio Department of Education, Columbus, OH.

Togneri, W. and Anderson, S.E. (2003), Beyond Islands of Excellence: What Districts Can Do to Improve Instruction and Achievement in All Schools, a project of the Learning First Alliance, Learning First Alliance and the ASCD, Washington, DC.

Togneri, W. and Lazarus, L. (2003), “Decentralization and system wide reform: a case study of the Chula Vista elementary school district”, a project of the Learning First Alliance, The Learning First Alliance, Washington, DC, available at: www.learningfirst.org/publications/districts (accessed 26 February 2013).

Trujillo, T. (2013), “The reincarnation of the effective schools research: rethinking the literature on district effectiveness”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 426‐452.

Tyack, D. (2002), “Forgotten players: how local school districts shaped American education”, in Hightower, A., Knapp, M.S., Marsh, J. and McLaughlin, M. (Eds), School Districts and Instructional Renewal, Teachers College Press, New York, NY, pp. 9‐24.

Wolhsetter, P., Datnow, A. and Park, V. (2008), “Creating a system for data‐driven decision‐making: applying the principal‐agent framework”, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 231‐259.

Wolhsetter, P., Smith, J. and Gallagher, A. (2013), “New York city's children first networks: turning accountability on its head”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 528‐549.

Zavadsky, H. (2009), Bringing School Reform to Scale: Five Award‐Winning Urban Districts, Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Educational Administration

Thông tin tác giả