Diversity and learning in groups

Emerald - 2003
MichaelaDriver1
1Michaela Driver is Assistant Professor of Management, in the Department of Management and Marketing, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA.

Tóm tắt

This paper examines how groups respond to diversity. Specifically, a framework is developed that integrates prior research on diversity in groups within a learning perspective. The value of the framework is that it seeks to integrate various dimensions of group diversity with the intent of highlighting critical characteristics of groups that effectively manage diverse member contributions. Within this framework, the focus is on cognitive rather than demographic diversity and on how groups use diverse ideas and approaches to learn collectively. Based on this framework, it is suggested that groups manage cognitive diversity in three distinct ways, through accommodation, elaboration and transformation. These responses to diversity may represent different levels of group learning along a continuum ranging from routine, exploitative to non‐routine, exploratory learning. An exploratory study is presented in which this framework is used to understand how groups manage cognitive diversity. Preliminary study results suggest that most groups seem to respond to diversity by accommodating or elaborating while very few groups seem to engage in transformation. Specifically, few groups seem to invest the necessary resources to capitalize on diversity and create opportunities for non‐routine learning. Implications for practice and research are discussed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Austin, J.R. (1997), “A cognitive framework for understanding demographic influences in groups”, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 342‐59.

Barsade, S.G., Ward, A.J., Turner, J.D.F. and Sonnenfeld, J.A. (2000), Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 802‐36.

Baugher, D., Varanelli, A. and Weisbord, E. (2000), “Gender and culture diversity occurring in self‐formed work groups”, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 391‐407.

Brewer, M. (1996), “Managing diversity: the role of social identities”, in Jackson, S.E. and Ruderman, M.N. (Eds), Diversity In Work Teams, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 47‐68.

Brickson, S. (2000), “The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational outcomes in demographically diverse settings”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 82‐101.

Cady, S.H. and Valentine, J. (1999), “Team innovation and perception of consideration: what difference does diversity make?”, Small Group Research, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 730‐50.

Coopman, S.J. (2001), “Democracy, performance, and outcomes in interdisciplinary health care teams”, The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 261‐84.

Crossan, M., Lane, H.W. and White, R.E. (1999), “An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 522‐37.

Diamond, M.A. (1991), “Stresses of group membership: balancing the needs for independence and belonging”, in Kets De Vries, M.F.R. (Ed.), Organizations On The Couch, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Dreachslin, J.L., Hunt, P.L., Sprainer, E. and Snook, I.D. (1999), Journal of Healthcare Management, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 252‐66.

Ely, R.J. (1996), “The role of dominant identity and experience in organizational work on diversity”, in Jackson, S.E. and Ruderman, M.N. (Eds), Diversity In Work Teams, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 161‐86.

Gabriel, Y. (1999), Organizations In Depth, Sage, London.

Guzzo, R.A. (1986), “Group decision making and group effectiveness in organizations”, in Goodman, P.S. (Ed.), Designing Effective Work Groups, Josey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 34‐71.

Hackman, J.R. and Morris, C.G. (1975), “Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: a review and proposed integration”, in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 8, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 360‐71.

Harrison, D.A., Price, K.H. and Bell, M.P. (1998), “Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface‐ and deep‐level diversity on work group cohesion”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 96‐107.

Harung, H.S. and Martens, L. (1995), “Enhancing organizational performance by strengthening diversity and unity”, The Learning Organization, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 9‐21.

Herriot, P. and Pemberton, C. (1996), Competitive Advantage Through Diversity: Organizational Learning From Difference, Walter De Gruyter, Berlin.

Hoffman, L.R. (1979), “Applying experimental research on group problem solving to organization”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 19, pp. 375‐91.

Hoffman, L.R. and Maier, N.R.E. (1961), “Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of heterogeneous and homogeneous groups”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 62, pp. 401‐7.

Iles, P. (1995), “Learning to work with difference”, Personnel Review, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 44‐61.

Janis, I.L. (1982), Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.

Jehn, K.A. and Chatman, J.A. (2000), International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 56‐73.

Jehn, K.A. and Mannix, E.A. (2001), “The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 238‐51.

Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B. and Neale, M.A. (1999)., “Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 741‐63.

Lee, M.D., Macdermid, S.M. and Buck, M.L. (2000), “Organizational paradigms of reduced‐load work: accommodation, elaboration, and transformation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 1211‐34.

Lembke, S. and Wilson, M.G. (1998), “Putting the ‘team’ into teamwork: alternative theoretical contributions for contemporary management practice”, Human Relations, Vol. 51 No. 7, pp. 927‐45.

Lichtenstein, R., Alexander, J.A., Jinnett, K. and Ullman, E. (1997), “Embedded intergroup relations in interdisciplinary teams: effects on perceptions of level of team integration”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 413‐34.

Lincoln, J.R. and Miller, J. (1979), “Work and friendship ties in organizations: a comparative analysis or related networks”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24, pp. 181‐99.

McGrath, J.E., Berdahl, J.L. and Arrow, H. (1996), “Traits, expectations, culture, and clout: diversity in work groups”, in Jackson, S.E. and Ruderman, M.N. (Eds), Diversity In Work Teams, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 17‐45.

Milliken, F.J. and Martins, L.L. (1996), “Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 402‐33.

Northcraft, G.B., Polzer, J.T., Neale, M.A. and Kramer, R.M. (1996), “Diversity, social identity and performance: emergent social dynamics in cross‐functional teams”, in Jackson, S.E. and Ruderman, M.N. (Eds), Diversity In Work Teams, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 69‐96.

Offermann, L.R. and Spiros, R.K. (2001), “The science and practice of team development: improving the link”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 376‐92.

O’Reilly, C.A., Caldwell, D.E. and Barnett, W.P. (1989), “Work group demography, social integration, and turnover”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 34, pp. 21‐37.

Osland, J.S., Kolb, D.A. and Rubin, I.M. (2001), Organizational Behavior: An Experiential Approach, 7th ed., Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Pedhazur, E.J. and Schmelkin, L.P. (1991), Measurement, Design, and Analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ.

Pelled, L.H., Eisenhardt, K.M. and Xin, K.R. (1999), Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 1‐28.

Porter, T.W. and Lilly, B.S. (1996), “The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 361‐76.

Robinson, G. and Dechant, K. (1997), “Building a business case for diversity”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 21‐31.

Sethi, R., Smith, D.C. and Whan Park, C. (2001), “The effect of cross‐functional teams on creativity and the innovativeness of new products”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 73‐85.

Simons, T., Pelled, L.H. and Smith, K.A. (1999), Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42 No. 6, pp. 662‐73.

Tajfel, H. (1982), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C. (1979), “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict”, in Austin, W.G. and Worchel, S. (Eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA, pp. 33‐53.

Thomas, D.A. and Ely, R.J. (1996), “Making differences matter: a new paradigm for managing diversity”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74 No. 5, pp. 79‐91.

Timmerman, T.A. (2000), “Racial diversity, age diversity, interdependence, and team performance”, Small Group Research, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 592‐606.

Van Der Vegt, G.S., Emans, B.J.M. and Van De Vliert, E. (2001), Personnel Psychology, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 51‐69.

Zenger, T.R. and Lawrence, B.S. (1989), “Organizational demography: the differential effects of age and tenure on technical communication”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, pp. 353‐76.

Barker, M. and Neailey, K. (1999), “From individual learning to project team learning and innovation: a structured approach”, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 1‐9.

Gerber, R. (1998), “How do workers learn in their work?”, The Learning Organization, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 1‐11.

Goh, S.C. (1998), “Toward a learning organization: the strategic building blocks”, SAM Advanced Management Journal, Vol. 63 No. 2, pp. 15‐21.

March, J.G. (1991), “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organization Science, Vol. 2, pp. 71‐87.

Robinson, T., Clemson, B. and Keating, C. (1997), “Development of high performance organizational learning units”, The Learning Organization, Vol. 4 No. 5, pp. 1‐9.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Thông tin tác giả