Diversity and forest productivity in a changing climate

New Phytologist - Tập 221 Số 1 - Trang 50-66 - 2019
Christian Ammer1,2
1Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land‐use University of Göttingen Büsgenweg 1 D‐37077 Göttingen Germany
2Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones Faculty of Forest Sciences University of Göttingen Büsgenweg 1 D‐37077 Göttingen Germany

Tóm tắt

ContentsSummary50I.Introduction50II.Drivers of the diversity–productivity relationship51III.Patterns of the diversity–productivity relationship55IV.Responses of mixed stands to climate change57V.Conclusions60Acknowledgements61References61SummaryAlthough the relationship between species diversity and biomass productivity has been extensively studied in grasslands, the impact of tree species diversity on forest productivity, as well as the main drivers of this relationship, are still under discussion. It is widely accepted that the magnitude of the relationship between tree diversity and forest stand productivity is context specific and depends on environmental conditions, but the underlying mechanisms of this relationship are still not fully understood. Competition reduction and facilitation have been identified as key mechanisms driving the diversity–productivity relationship. However, contrasting results have been reported with respect to the extent to which competition reduction and facilitation determine the diversity–productivity relationship. They appear to depend on regional climate, soil fertility, functional diversity of the tree species involved, and developmental stage of the forest. The purpose of this review is to summarize current knowledge and to suggest a conceptual framework to explain the various processes leading to higher productivity of species‐rich forests compared with average yields of their respective monocultures. This framework provides three pathways for possible development of the diversity–productivity relationship under a changing climate.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.3390/f8100363

10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.07.038

Ammer C, 2017, Progress in botany, 345

Ammer C, 2008, Converting Norway spruce stands with beech – a review on arguments and techniques, Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 125, 3

10.1139/x06-042

10.1111/1365-2745.12728

10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.043

10.1371/journal.pone.0081246

10.1007/978-3-662-54553-9_9

10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.004

10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01017.x

10.1139/x03-158

Bolte A, 2010, Sustainable forest management in a changing world: a European perspective, 115

10.1007/s10342-005-0075-5

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01772.x

10.1111/1365-2745.12023

10.1093/jpe/rtw096

10.1002/ece3.2950

10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19294.x

10.1111/1365-2664.12783

10.1890/15-0625.1

10.1111/1365-2745.12132

10.1038/nature11688

10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.013

Cotta H, 1828, Anweisung zum Waldbau

10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2

10.1111/1365-2435.12821

10.1111/1365-2745.12897

10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2

10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.049

10.1007/s10342-017-1056-1

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00607.x

10.1007/s10342-016-1017-0

10.1111/gcb.12026

10.1007/s00442-014-3107-3

10.1890/14-0738.1

10.1126/science.289.5487.2068

10.1016/j.actao.2016.12.002

10.1038/s41467-018-03529-w

10.1111/ele.12786

10.1007/s10342-016-0966-7

10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.003

10.1093/treephys/tpv011

10.1007/978-3-662-54553-9_3

10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.026

Forrester DI, 2017, Effects of crown architecture and stand structure on light absorption in mixed and monospecific Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris forests along a productivity and climate gradient through Europe, Journal of Ecology, 34, 686

10.1007/s40725-016-0031-2

10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.012

10.1111/1365-2745.12704

10.1111/1365-2664.12745

10.1016/j.foreco.2013.04.038

10.1016/j.foreco.2015.08.016

10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.036

10.1007/s00442-002-0965-x

10.1038/ncomms2328

Garber SM, 2004, Stand productivity and development in two mixed‐species spacing trials in the Central Oregon Cascades, Forest Science, 50, 92, 10.1093/forestscience/50.1.92

10.5962/bhl.title.44539

10.1111/1365-2745.12575

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.009

10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.05.013

10.1111/1365-2745.12813

10.1002/eco.1810

10.1007/s11104-016-2930-1

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.011

10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.004

10.1007/s10021-013-9729-1

10.1073/pnas.1411970111

10.1002/ecy.1958

10.1111/oik.02090

10.1093/treephys/tpx050

10.1038/nature13247

10.1098/rstb.2011.0094

10.1126/science.286.5442.1123

10.1111/jvs.12234

10.1038/nature11118

10.1139/cjfr-2014-0188

IPCC, 2013, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 3

10.1038/nature15374

10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.023

10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20476.x

10.1051/forest/2010005

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01073.x

10.1016/j.foreco.2017.05.036

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.032

10.1111/nph.13222

10.1007/s00468-017-1581-z

10.1111/1365-2745.12522

10.1111/ele.12382

10.1111/1365-2745.12276

10.1111/1365-2435.12428

10.1007/s13595-014-0446-5

10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.011

10.1073/pnas.0701424104

10.1007/s10342-007-0186-2

10.1007/s10342-010-0397-9

10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.11.268

10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02065.x

10.1007/s00442-012-2526-2

10.1093/treephys/tpr042

10.1016/j.foreco.2012.03.005

10.1016/j.foreco.2013.04.003

10.1007/s00442-012-2259-2

10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.06.001

10.1111/1365-2745.12519

10.1126/science.aaf8957

10.1016/j.foreco.2007.02.028

10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.030

10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023

10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910101.x

10.1038/35083573

10.1126/science.1064088

10.1890/11-0792.1

10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.032

von Lüpke B, 2004, Norway spruce conversion – options and consequences. European Forest Institute Research Reports, vol. 18, 121, 10.1163/9789047412908_009

10.1038/srep32233

10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01476.x

10.1139/cjfr-2013-0088

10.1007/s11056-011-9297-1

10.1002/eap.1631

10.3390/f8090332

10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00669.x

10.1007/s00468-009-0336-x

10.1111/nph.13382

10.1111/gcb.13113

10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.014

10.1111/1365-2745.12846

10.1007/s00468-014-0991-4

10.1007/s00468-010-0499-5

10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.018

10.1111/1365-2745.12851

10.1111/ele.12357

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01691.x

10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.003

10.1111/gcb.12751

10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.025

10.1002/ecy.1748

10.1038/s41559-017-0326-0

10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.047

10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00592.x

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x

10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.026

10.1007/s10342-005-0068-4

10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.027

Pretzsch H, 2005, A re‐evaluation of Reineke's rule and stand density index, Forest Science, 51, 304, 10.1093/forestscience/51.4.304

10.1139/cjfr-2015-0413

10.1051/forest/2010037

10.1007/s10342-015-0900-4

10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.043

10.1007/s10342-008-0215-9

10.1007/s10342-015-0913-z

10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00670.x

10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.032

10.1111/geb.12406

10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.018

10.1007/s10342-015-0927-6

10.1111/1365-2745.12727

10.1111/plb.12029

Riofrío J, 2017, Mixing effects on growth efficiency in mixed pine forests, Forestry, 90, 381

10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.036

10.1890/15-1549.1

10.1038/nature15539

10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.01.018

10.1111/geb.12126

10.1890/12-0622.1

10.1111/btp.12252

10.1890/13-1366.1

10.3390/f8060177

10.1016/j.ppees.2007.08.002

Schmid B, 2002, Functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions, 120

10.1038/s41559-017-0104

10.1139/cjfr-31-3-539

10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.021

10.1371/journal.pone.0022905

10.1007/s10980-016-0422-6

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.11.036

10.1002/eco.1479

10.1017/CBO9781139177245.006

10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.032

10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00626.x

10.1007/s10980-015-0317-y

10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.048

10.1002/eap.1373

10.1890/04-1540

10.1093/jpe/rtw094

10.2307/1930070

10.1038/ismej.2015.116

10.1007/s13595-016-0588-8

10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.020

10.1111/ele.12600

10.1007/s00442-013-2815-4

10.1111/1365-2745.12811

10.1111/1365-2745.12353

10.1098/rspb.2016.1451

10.1111/nph.13179

10.1111/1365-2745.12839

10.1016/j.baae.2018.01.003

10.1371/journal.pone.0053530

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01016.x

10.1111/1365-2435.12945

10.1007/s10980-016-0429-z

10.1038/s41559-016-0063

10.1007/s00468-011-0563-9

10.1016/j.foreco.2017.06.018

10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01944.x

10.1111/1365-2435.12699