Divergent roles for multiple sexual signals in a polygynous lizard

Functional Ecology - Tập 20 Số 4 - Trang 709-716 - 2006
Jay J. Meyers1, Duncan J. Irschick1, Bieke Vanhooydonck2, Anthony Herrel2
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Tulane University, 310 Dinwiddie Hall, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA, and
2Laboratory for Functional Morphology, University of Antwerp (UIA), Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium

Tóm tắt

Summary

An unresolved issue in sexual selection concerns the utility of multiple sexual signals that are used simultaneously during displays. We examined male lizards (Urosaurus ornatus) that exhibit two colourful ornaments (throat patch and belly patch) during territorial displays. Populations of Urosaurus ornatus can be polymorphic in throat coloration, and previous studies have shown that the morphs differ in behavioural aggression. We assume that throat coloration correlates with behavioural aggression in our population, as for other populations of U. ornatus.

We show that these different morphs do not differ significantly in morphological shape or bite force, a key aspect of fighting capacity. However, by contrast, the size of the belly patch is a significant predictor of maximum bite force, which is a predictor of dominance in other lizards.

We suggest that belly patch size and throat patch coloration are largely exclusive in that dominant individuals can exhibit small belly patches and low bite forces, whereas subordinate individuals can have large belly patches and high bite forces. Thus, embedded within the same male lizard display are divergent sexual structures that signal different traits, implying that the possession of multiple sexual signals within animals may be favoured by selection.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1515/9780691207278

10.1007/BF00303836

10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01442.x

10.1098/rspb.2003.2343

10.2307/1466998

Dame E.A., Behavioural mechanisms of invasion and isplacement in Pacific island geckos (Hemidactylus), Animal Behavior

10.2307/2389343

10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.03.011

10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00305.x

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04302.x

10.1007/s002650050398

10.2307/1445244

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05880.x

10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01038.x

10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.023

10.1098/rspb.2004.2891

10.1086/432564

10.1006/anbe.1997.0572

10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00103.x

10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0252:DCSAAI]2.0.CO;2

10.1126/science.122.3158.73

10.1007/BF02347890

10.1007/BF00173774

10.1093/icb/38.1.133

10.1016/0022-5193(74)90111-8

10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.02.003

10.1515/9781400886142

10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00427.x

10.1038/380240a0

10.1006/hbeh.2000.1622

10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80120-4

10.2307/1446597

10.1016/0018-506X(92)90023-O

10.2307/1466994

10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00940.x

Whiting M.J., 2003, Lizard Social Behavior, 47

10.1098/rspb.1999.0811

10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3