Distributed resource scheduling in smart grid with electric vehicle deployment using fireworks algorithm

Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy - Tập 4 - Trang 188-199 - 2016
K. Srikanth REDDY1, Lokesh Kumar PANWAR2, Rajesh KUMAR2, Bijaya Ketan PANIGRAHI1
1IIT , Delhi, New Delhi, India
2MNIT Jaipur, Jaipur, India

Tóm tắt

Global warming and climate change are two key probing issues in the present context. The electricity sector and transportation sector are two principle entities propelling both these issues. Emissions from these two sectors can be offset by switching to greener ways of transportation through the electric vehicle (EV) and renewable energy technologies (RET). Thus, effective scheduling of both resources holds the key to sustainable practice. This paper presents a scheduling scenario-based approach in the smart grid. Problem formulation with dual objective function including both emissions and cost is developed for conventional unit commitment with EV and RET deployment. In this work, the scheduling and commitment problem is solved using the fireworks algorithm which mimics explosion of fireworks in the sky to define search space and the distance between associated sparks to evaluate global minimum. Further, binary coded fireworks algorithm is developed for the proposed scheduling problem in the smart grid. Thereafter, possible scenarios in conventional as well as smart grid are put forward. Following that, the proposed methodology is simulated using a test system with thermal generators.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Gupta S, Tirpak DA, Burger N et al (2007) Chaptor 13: policies, instruments and co-operative arrangements. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR et al (eds) Climate change 2007: working group III: mitigation of climate change, IPCC 4th assessment report, intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Kyoto protocol to the united nation framework convention on climate change. United Nations, New York, NY, USA, 1998

The modern grid initiative. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Grid Wise Architecture Council, Richland, WA, USA, 2008

Lu B, Shahidehpour M (2005) Unit commitment with flexible generating units. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(2):1022–1034

Bu SR, Yu FR, Liu PX (2011) Stochastic unit commitment in smart grid communications. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE conference on computer communications workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS’11), Shanghai, China, 10–15 Apr 2011, pp 307–312

Khorsand MA, Zakariazadeh A, Jadid S (2011) Stochastic wind-thermal generation scheduling considering emission reduction: A multiobjective mathematical programming approach. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Asia-Pacific power and energy engineering conference (APPEEC’11), Wuhan, China, 25–28 Mar 2011, pp 25–28

Chakraborty S, Senjyu T, Yona A et al (2009) Fuzzy unit commitment strategy integrated with solar energy system using a modified differential evolution approach. In: Proceedings of the transmission & distribution conference & exposition: Asia and Pacific, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 26–30 Oct 2009, pp 26–30

Botterud A, Zhou Z, Wang JH et al (2013) Demand dispatch and probabilistic wind power forecasting in unit commitment and economic dispatch: a case study of Illinois. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 4(1):250–261

Dyke KJ, Schofield N, Barnes M (2010) The impact of transport electrification on electrical networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 57(12):3917–3926

Saber AY, Venayagamoorthy GK (2009) Unit commitment with vehicle-to-grid using particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech conference, Bucharest, Romanian, 28 Jun–2 Jul 2009, 8 pp

Khodayar ME, Wu L, Shahidehpour M (2012) Hourly coordination of electric vehicle operation and volatile wind power generation in SCUC. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3(3):1271–1279

Delarue E, Cattrysse D, D’haeseleera W (2013) Enhanced priority list unit commitment method for power systems with a high share of renewables. Electr Power Syst Res 105(6):115–123

Wang C, Shahidehpour SM (1993) Effects of ramp-rate limits on unit commitment and economic dispatch. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(3):1341–1350

Viana A, Pedroso JP (2013) A new MILP-based approach for unit commitment in power production planning. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 44(1):997–1005

Jiang QY, Zhou BR, Zhang MZ (2013) Parallel augment Lagrangian relaxation method for transient stability constrained unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(2):1140–1148

Kazarlis SA, Bakirtzis AG, Petridis V (1996) A genetic algorithm solution to the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 11(1):83–92

Cheng CP, Liu CW, Liu CC (2000) Unit commitment by Lagrangian relaxation and genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(2):707–714

Zhao B, Guo CX, Bai BR et al (2006) An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for unit commitment. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 28(7):482–490

Balci HH, Valenzuela JF (2004) Scheduling electric power generations using particle swarm optimization combined with the Lagrangian relaxation method. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 14(3):411–421

Panwar LK, Srikanth Reddy K, Kumar R (2014) Productive use of distributed renewable generation source with electric vehicle in smart grid. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE power India international conference (PIICON’14), Delhi, India, 5–7 Dec 2014, 6 pp

Yuan XH, Nie H, Su AJ et al (2009) An improved binary particle swarm optimization for unit commitment problem. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):8049–8055

Vaisakh K, Srinivas LR (2011) Evolving ant colony optimization based unit commitment. Appl Soft Comput 11(2):2863–2870

Tan Y, Zhu YC (2010) Fireworks algorithm for optimization. In: Advances in swarm intelligence: proceedings of the 1st international conference on swarm intelligence (ICSI’10), part 1, Beijing, China, 12–15 Jun 2010, LNCS 6145, pp 355–364

El-Fouly THM, El-Saadany EF, Salama MMA (2006) Grey predictor for wind energy conversion systems output power prediction. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(3):1450–1452

Chang TP, Liu FJ, Ko HH et al (2014) Comparative analysis on power curve models of wind turbine generator in estimating capacity factor. Energy 73(7):88–95

Rekioua D, Matagne E (2012) Modeling of solar irradiance and cells. In: Rekioua D, Matagne E (eds) Optimization of photovoltaic power systems: modelization, simulation and control. Springer, London, pp 31–37

Osterwald CR, Glatfelter T, Burdick J (1987) Comparison of the temperature coefficients of the basic I-V parameters for various types of solar cells. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference (PVSC’87), New Orleans, LA, USA, 4 May 1987, pp 188–193

Saber AY, Venayagamoorthy GK (2011) Plug-in vehicles and renewable energy sources for cost and emission reductions. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(4):1229–1238

Saber AY, Venayagamoorthy GK (2010) Efficient utilization of renewable energy sources by gridable vehicles in cyber-physical energy systems. IEEE Syst J 4(3):285–294

California plug-in electric vehicle driver survey results. California Center for Sustainable Energy, San Diego, CA, USA, 2013

Gholami A, Jamei M, Ansari J et al (2014) Combined economic and emission dispatch incorporating renewable energy sources and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Int J Energy Sci 4(2):60–67

Juste KA, Kita H, Tanaka E et al (1999) An evolutionary programming solution to the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14(4):452–459

Valenzuela J, Smith AE (2002) A seeded memetic algorithm for large unit commitment problems. J Heuristics 8(2):173–195

Viana A, Sausa JPD, Matos M (2003) Using GRASP to solve the unit commitment problem. Ann Oper Res 120(1/2/3/4):117–132

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy

Tập 4

188-199

Thông tin tác giả