Discourse prominence effects on interpretation of reflexive pronoun “ziji” in children with ASD

Gaowa Wuyun1, Long Zhang2, Kai Wang2, Yanhong Wu3,4
1Teachers College, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China
2Laboratory of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatc Disorder and Mental Health, Hefei, China
3Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
4School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China

Tóm tắt

The core of language disorders in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is the loss of social function in language communication.Futher, the correct use and processing of personal pronouns is the basis of language social function. Therefore, clarifying the mechanism of processing the pronoun reference in children with ASD is a major focus in autism research. Currently, the main contradictory focus of the anaphora processing ability in children with ASD is use of semantic pragmatic information in the process of pronoun processing. Therefore, this study will focus on the effect of semantic cues on pronoun processing in children with autism spectrum disorder. This study uses the Chinese reflexive pronoun "ziji" (eg., himself/herself) as the media, because the Chinese reflexive pronoun "ziji (oneself)" is relatively flexible, which is not only restricted by the rule of syntactic rules, but also influenced by the semantic information of the antecedent. This study investigated the processing mechanism of Chinese reflexive pronoun "ziji (oneself)" in children with autism spectrum disorder by manipulating the position of strong semantic cues. The results showed that participants from both the experimental group (children with ASD) and the two control groups (children with typical development and children with intellectual disabilities) were able to process strong semantic cues. When the second person pronoun "you" or the s participant’s name appears in the remote subject position, children from both the experimental group and the two control groups could use semantic information to make long distance anaphora of the reflexive pronoun "ziji (oneself)". Conversely, when the second person pronoun "you" appeared in the close subject position, the children with autism spectrum disorder and the two control groups would both make close anaphora with the reflexive pronoun “ziji (oneself)”. This study found that children with autism spectrum disorder can process semantic information normally during pronoun anaphora when the semantic cues are sufficiently prominence. The results of this study provide a more comprehensive understanding of the language processing mechanism of individuals with autism spectrum disorder.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.,text revision). American Psychiatric Press. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric. Bavin, E. L., & Naigles, L. R. (2015). The Cambridge handbook of child language: language in children with autism spectrum. Disorders, 29(29), 637–658. Bergmann, C., Paulus, M., & Fikkert, P. (2011). Preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns and reflexives: The impact of the task. Journal of Child Language, 39, 777–803. Chen, P. (1992). The reflexive z iji in Chinese: Functional vs formalist approaches. In: Thomas Hun-Tak Lee (ed.), Research on Chinese Linguistics in Hong Kong: Linguistic society of Hong Kong. pp. 1–36 Chien, Y. C., Wexler, K., & Chang, H. W. (1993). Children’s development of long-distance binding in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2(3), 229–259. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris. Cummings, L. (2014). Pragmatic Disorders and Social Communication. Springer. Cygan, H. B., Tacikowski, P., Ostaszewski, P., Chojnicka, I., & Nowicka, A. (2014). Neural correlates of own name and own face detection in autism spectrum disorder. PLoS ONE, 9(1), 14. Edelson, L. R. (2011). Cues to pronominal reference resolution in children with and. without autism spectrum disorders. p. 151 Finnegan, E. G., Asaro-Saddler, K., & Zajic, M. C. (2020). Production and comprehension of pronouns in individuals with autism: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Autism, 25, 3–17. Foraker, S., & McElree, B. (2007). The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 357–383. Franklin, J. M., Eddings, W., Austin, P. C., Stuart, E. A., & Schneeweiss, S. (2017). Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes. Statistics in Medicine, 36(12), 1946–1963. Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2014). An Introduction to Language (10th ed.). Cengage Lerning. Gernsbacher, M., & Pripas-Kapit, S. (2012). Who’s missing the point? A commentary on claims that autistic persons have a specific deficit in figurative language comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(1), 93–105. Giorgi, A. (2006). From temporal anchoring to long distance anaphors. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 24(4), 1009–1047. Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311–347. Hu, J. H. (2002). Prominence and Locality in Grammar: The Syntax and Semantics of Wh-questions and Reflexives. Ph. D. Dissertation. City University of Hong Kong. Huang, C.-T. J., & Liu, C.-S. L. (2001). Logophoricity, attitudes, and ziji at the interface. In P. Cole, G. Hermon, & C.-T. J. Huang (Eds.), Long-distance Reflexives, Vol. 33 of Syntax and Semantics (pp. 141–195). Academic Press. Jakubowicz, C. (1994). Reflexives in french and danish: morphology, syntax and acquisition. In Barbara Lust, Gabriella Hermon, and Jaklin Kornfilt (eds.), Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Cross-linguistic Perspectives. Binding Dependencies and Learnability. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Janke, V., & Perovic, A. (2015). Intact grammar in HFA? Evidence from Control and. Binding. Lingua, 164, 68–86. Li, X., & Zhou, X. (2010). Who is ziji? ERP responses to the Chinese reflexive pronoun during sentence comprehension. Brain Research, 1331(3), 96–104. Lukyanenko, C., Conroy, A., & Lidz, J. (2014). Is she patting katie? Constraints on pronominal reference in 30-Month-Olds. Language Learning and Development, 10(4), 328–344. Mack, A., Pappas, Z., Silverman, M., & Gay, R. (2002). What we see: Inattention and the capture of attention by meaning. Consciousness and Cognition, 11(4), 488–506. McKee, C. (1992). A comparison of pronouns and anaphors in Italian and English acquisition. Language Acquisition, 1, 21–55. Novick, J. M., Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Trueswell, J. C. (2008). Putting lexical constraints in context into the visual-world paradigm. Cognition, 107(3), 850–903. Pan, H.H. (1995). Locality, self-ascription, discourse prominence, and Mandarin reflexives. Ph. D. Dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin. Perovic, A., Modyanova, N., & Wexler, K. (2013a). Comparison of grammar in neurodevelopmental disorders: The case of binding in williams syndrome and autism with and without language impairment. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 133–154. Perovic, A., Modyanova, N., & Wexler, K. (2013b). Comprehension of reflexive and personal pronouns in children with autism: A syntactic or pragmatic deficit? Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(4), 813–835. Perrin, F., García-Larrea, L., Mauguière, F., & Bastuji, H. (1999). A differential brain response to the subject’s own name persists during sleep. Clinical Neurophysiology, 12, 2153–2164. Pyykkönen, P., Matthews, D., & Järvikivi, J. (2010). Three-year-olds are sensitive to semantic prominence during online language comprehension: A visual world study of pronoun resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(1), 115–129. Ruigendijk, E., Friedmann, N., Novogrodsky, R., & Balaban, N. (2010). Symmetry in comprehension and production of pronouns: A comparison of German and Hebrew. Lingua, 120, 1991–2005. Runner, J. T., Sussman, R. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006). Processing reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases. Cognitive Science, 30(2), 193–241. Shelley-Tremblay, J., & Mack, A. (1999). Metacontrast masking and attention. Psychological Science, 10(6), 508–515. Sigurjónsdóttir, S., & Nina, H. (1992). Reflexivization and logophoricity: Evidence from the acquisition of Icelandic. Language Acquisition, 2(4), 359–413. Song, H., & Fisher, C. (2007). Discourse prominence effects on 2. 5-year-old children’s interpretation of pronouns. Lingua, 117(11), 1959–1987. Speas, M. (1990). Phrase structure in natural language. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Su, Y., & Su, L. Y. (2015). Interpretation of logical words in mandarin-speaking children with autism spectrum disorders: Uncovering knowledge of semantics and pragmatics. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 45(7), 1–13. Swaab, T. Y., Camblin, C. C., & Gordon, P. C. (2004). Electrophysiological evidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(5), 715–726. Tager-Flusberg, H. (2004). Strategies for conducting research on language in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders., 34, 75–80. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634. Tek, S., & Naigles, L. (2017). The shape bias as a word-learning principle: Lessons from and for autism spectrum disorder. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(1), 94. Terzi, A., Marinis, T., & Francis, K. (2016). The Interface of syntax with pragmatics and prosody in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(8), 2692–2706. Terzi, A., Marinis, T., Kotsopoulou, A., & Francis, K. (2014). Grammatical abilities of greek-speaking children with autism. Language Acquisition, 21(1), 4–44. van Rij, J., Hollebrandse, B., & Hendriks, P. (2016). Children's eye gaze reveals their use of discourse context in object pronoun resolution. In A. Holler, & K. Suckow (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on anaphora resolution (pp. 267–293). Wexler, K. (1999). Maturation and growth of grammar. In C. R. William & K. B. Tej (Eds.), Handbook of Child Language Acquisition (pp. 55–109). Academic Press. Whyte, E., Nelson, K., & Khan, K. (2011). Learning of idiomatic language expressions in a group intervention for children with autism. Autism, 17(4), 449–464. Whyte, E., Nelson, M., Keith, E., et al. (2013). Learning of idiomatic language expressions in a group intervention for children with autism. Autism the International Journal of Research & Practice. Wuyun, G., Wang, J., Zhang, L., Wang, K., Yi, L., & Wu, Y. (2020). Actions speak louder than words: the role of action in self-referential advantage in children with autism. Autism research, 13(5), 810–820. Xiao, H., & Elsi, K. (2016). Processing the Chinese reflexive “ziji”: effects of featural constraints on anaphor resolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 284. Xu, L. (1994). The antecedent of ziji (oneself). Journal of Chinese Linguistics., 22, 115–137. Xu, X. D., Jiang, X. M., & Zhou, X. L. (2013). Processing biological gender and number information during Chinese pronoun resolution: ERP evidence for functional differentiation. Brain and Cognition, 81, 223–236. Zhang, Y. X., Li, P., Piao, Q. H., Liu, Y. Y., Huang, Y. J., & Shu, H. (2013). Syntax does not necessarily precede semantics in sentence processing: ERP evidence from Chinese. Brain and Language., 126, 8–19. Zhang, Y. X., Yu, J., & Boland, J. E. (2010). Semantics does not need a processing. License from syntax in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition., 36, 765–781. Zhou, P., Ma, W., Zhan, L., & Ma, H. (2018). Using the visual world paradigm to study sentence comprehension in mandarin-speaking children with autism. Journal of Visualized Experiments (140). Zimmermann, J., Wolf, M., Bock, A., Peham, D., & Benecke, C. (2013). The way we refer to ourselves reflects how we relate to others: Associations between first-person pronoun use and interpersonal problems. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 218–225.