Discordance between functional magnetic resonance imaging during silent speech tasks and intraoperative speech arrest

Journal of Neurosurgery - Tập 103 Số 2 - Trang 267-274 - 2005
Nicole M Petrovich1, Andrei I. Holodny, Viviane Tabar, Denise D. Correa, Joy Hirsch, Philip H. Gutin, Cameron Brennan
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.

Tóm tắt

Object. The goal of this study was to investigate discordance between the location of speech arrest during awake cortical mapping, a common intraoperative indicator of hemispheric dominance, and silent speech functional magnetic resonance (fMR) imaging maps of frontal language function. Methods. Twenty-one cases were reviewed retrospectively. Images of silent speech fMR imaging activation were coregistered to anatomical MR images obtained for neuronavigation. These were compared with the intraoperative cortical photographs and the behavioral results of electrocorticography during awake craniotomy. An fMR imaging control study of three healthy volunteers was then conducted to characterize the differences between silent and vocalized speech fMR imaging protocols used for neurosurgical planning. Conclusions. Results of fMR imaging showed consistent and predominant activation of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) during silent speech tasks. During intraoperative mapping, however, 16 patients arrested in the precentral gyrus (PRG), well posterior to the fMR imaging activity. Of those 16, 14 arrested only in the PRG and not in the IFG as silent speech fMR imaging predicted. The control fMR imaging study showed that vocalized speech fMR imaging shifts the location of the fMR imaging prediction to include the motor strip and may be more appropriate for neurosurgical planning.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abrahams S, 2003, Hum Brain Mapp, 20, 29, 10.1002/hbm.10126

10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199908)12:5<293::AID-NBM573>3.0.CO;2-6

Baciu MV, 2003, Epilepsy Behav, 4, 776, 10.1016/j.yebeh.2003.08.002

10.1159/000098989

10.1002/hbm.460030206

Bullmore ET, 1999, Hum Brain Mapp, 7, 38, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:1<38::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-Q

Cohen L, 2004, Neuroimage, 22, 466, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.049

Fernandez G, 2003, Neurology, 60, 969, 10.1212/01.WNL.0000049934.34209.2E

FitzGerald DB, 1997, AJNR, 18, 1529

Hajnal JV, 1994, Magn Reson Med, 31, 283, 10.1002/mrm.1910310307

Heim S, 2003, Brain Lang, 85, 402, 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00068-3

Hirsch J, 2000, Neurosurgery, 47, 711

Holodny AI, 2000, AJNR, 21, 1415

Huang J, 2002, Hum Brain Mapp, 15, 39, 10.1002/hbm.1060

10.1016/j.jns.2003.12.001

Li P, 2004, Neuroimage, 21, 1533, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.044

Liegeois F, 2004, Brain, 127, 1229, 10.1093/brain/awh159

10.1006/nimg.2000.0562

10.1016/S1064-9689(03)00062-X

Nelles JL, 2003, Neuroimage, 20, 1865, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.020

Ojemann GA, 1993, Adv Neurol, 63, 155

10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4

Price CJ, 1999, Hum Brain Mapp, 8, 102, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:2/3<102::AID-HBM6>3.0.CO;2-J

Price CJ, 2003, Brain Lang, 86, 272, 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00544-8

10.3171/jns.2003.99.2.0311

Riecker A, 2000, Brain Lang, 75, 259, 10.1006/brln.2000.2356

Rizzolatti G, 2004, Annu Rev Neurosci, 27, 169, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230

10.1227/01.NEU.0000064803.05077.40

Ruge MI, 1999, Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 72, 95, 10.1159/000029706

10.1006/brln.2001.2600

10.1159/000028768

10.1007/s00330-004-2328-y

Wildgruber D, 1996, Neuroreport, 7, 2791, 10.1097/00001756-199611040-00077

10.1259/bjr/66817309

Wilson SM, 2004, Nat Neurosci, 7, 701, 10.1038/nn1263

Woods RP, 1998, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 22, 139, 10.1097/00004728-199801000-00027

Yetkin FZ, 1995, AJNR, 16, 1087

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Neurosurgery

Tập 103 Số 2

267-274

Thông tin tác giả