Digital Technologies and the Automation of Education — Key Questions and Concerns

Neil Selwyn1, Thomas Hillman2, Annika Bergviken Rensfeldt2, Carlo Perrotta1
1Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
2University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrejevic, M. (2020). Automated media. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.

Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. In G. Johannsen & J. Rijnsdorp (Eds.), Analysis, design and evaluation of man–machine systems (pp. 129-135). Oxford: Pergamon.

Bell, G. (2021). Touching the future. Griffith Review, 71. www.griffithreview.com/articles/touching-the-future/. Accessed 1 September 2021.

Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? European Journal of Education, 50(1),75-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109.

Bridle, J. (2018). New dark age. London: Verso.

De Freitas, E., Rousell, D., & Jäger, N. (2020). Relational architectures and wearable space: Smart schools and the politics of ubiquitous sensation. Research in Education, 107(1),10-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0034523719883667.

Fiebig, T., Gürses, S., Gañán, C. H., Kotkamp, E., Kuipers, F., Lindorfer, M., Prisse, M., & Sari, T. (2021). Heads in the Clouds: Measuring the Implications of Universities Migrating to Public Clouds. arXiv:2104.09462.

Fourcade, M., & Gordon, J. (2020). Learning like a state: statecraft in the digital age. Journal of Law and Political Economy, 1(1).

Gilliard, C. (2018). Friction-free racism, Real Life, 15 October. https://reallifemag.com/friction-free-racism/. Accessed 1 September 2021.

Horning, R. (2021) The shape of the grape and the taste of the wine are mutually independent. 3 June. https://tinyletter.com/robhorning/letters/the-shape-of-the-grape-and-the-taste-of-the-wine-are-mutually-independent. Accessed 1 September 2021.

Jorritsma, W., Cnossen, F., & van Ooijen, P. (2015). Improving the radiologist–CAD interaction. Clinical Radiology, 70(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2014.09.017.

Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Latour, B. (2004). Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical inquiry, 30(2), 225-248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.

Monroe, D. (2021). The paradox of left techno-pessimism. Computational Impacts, 12 August https://monroelab.net/projects/impacts/2021/08/12/the-paradox-of-left-techno-pessimism/. Accessed 1 September 2021.

Pasquale, F. (2020). New laws of robotics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Rasch, M. (2020). Friction and the aesthetics of the smooth. Eurozine, 11 May. www.eurozine.com/friction-and-the-aesthetics-of-the-smooth/. Accessed 1 September 2021.

Rieder, B. (2020). Engines of order. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Sparrow, R. (2021) Slaves to the algorithms: algocracy and Republican liberty. Keynote presentation to (Unintended) Information in Human-Machine Interaction symposium, 21-23rd April. Hagen: FernUniversität.

Taylor, A. (2018). The automation charade. Logic, 1 August. https://logicmag.io/failure/the-automation-charade/. Accessed 1 September 2021.

Tennant, C., & Stilgoe, J. (2021). The attachments of ‘autonomous’ vehicles. Social Studies of Science, 03063127211038752. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F03063127211038752.

Webb, T., Sellar, S., & Gulson, K. (2020). Anticipating education: governing habits, memories and policy-futures. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 284-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1686015.

Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of smart machines. New York: Basic Books.