Differences in interproximal and occlusal tooth wear among prehistoric tennessee indians: Implications for masticatory function

Wiley - Tập 57 Số 1 - Trang 103-115 - 1982
Robert J. Hinton1
1Department of Anatomy and Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

Tóm tắt

AbstractBreadth of the interproximal wear facet between lower P2 and M1 and between lower M1 and M2 was measured in human skeletal samples representing the Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippian periods of Tennessee River Valley prehistory, with the aim of assessing relative magnitudes of applied masticatory forces. When stratified by level of occlusal wear, mean interproximal facet breadth was consistently larger in the Archaic sample than in the Mississippian sample, with the Woodland sample intermediate. An analysis of covariance demonstrated that there was significant (p ⩽ 0.01) differences in facet size among the three groups even when differences in crown breadth were taken into account. Similar results were obtained in regressions of facet size on chronological age (Archaic larger than Mississippian at p ⩽ 0.01). Since rate of occlusal wear appears to be somewhat greater in the Archaic sample than in the later samples, the differences in interproximal wear are probably underestimated. It is suggested that the high levels of interproximal wear in the Archaic are indicative of the large occlusal forces and repetitive chewing required to masticate a diet of seeds, wild plant foods, and small animals, for which prior preparation (e.g., grinding, cooking) was minimal or nonexistent (as indicated by paleofecal samples). The lower amounts of interproximal wear observed in the Woodland and Mississippian samples imply considerable reductions in strenuous mastication, perhaps due to the widespread adoption during these periods of pottery and the earth oven, together with ethnographically‐documented techniques of food preparation that transformed most foods to a soft consistency.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/00220345560350050201

10.1177/00220345630420031601

Bowen W R)1975)Late Archaic Subsistence and Settlement in the Western Tennessee Valley: A Reevaluation. Unpublished M. A. Thesis University of Tennessee Knoxville.

Bowen W R, 1979, The Late Archaic in the Upper Duck River Valley, Tenn. Anthrop., 4, 140

Brodie A G, 1934, The significance of tooth form, Angle Orthodont., 4, 335

Buikstra J E, 1977, Biocultural Adaptation in Prehistoric America, 67

10.1177/00220345780570071301

Campbell T N, 1959, Choctaw subsistence: ethnographic notes from the Linceum manuscript, Florida Anthrop., 12, 9

10.1002/aja.1001510109

10.1159/000392726

Chapman J, 1973, The Icehouse Bottom Site‐40MR23. Report of Investigations No. 13

Chiltoskey M U, 1975, Gastronomy: The Anthropology of Food Habits, 235

10.1002/ajpa.1330510415

Cowan C W, 1978, Seasonal nutritional stress in a Late Woodland population: suggestions from some Eastern Kentucky coprolites, Tenn. Anthrop., 3, 117

Crites G D, 1978, Plant food utilization patterns during the Middle Woodland Owl Hollow phase in Tennessee: a preliminary report, Tenn. Anthrop., 3, 79

10.14219/jada.archive.1963.0364

10.1016/0002-9416(49)90111-6

10.2307/279039

Faulkner C H, 1977, Fourth Report of the Normandy Archaeological Project. Report of Investigations No. 19, 65

Faulkner C H, 1976, Third Report of the Normandy Archaeological Project. Report of Investigations No. 16, 217

Faulkner CH, 1978, Fifth Report of the Normandy Archaeological Project. Report of Investigations No. 20

Gibbs C H, 1980, Movements of the molar teeth and the mandibular condyles during chewing, J. Dent. Res., 59

Spec. Iss. B:915)abstract).

10.1016/B978-0-08-009823-4.50012-4

Graf H, 1975, Occlusion: Research in Form and Function, 112

Hinton R J)1981a) Changes in articular eminence morphology with dental function.Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. in press.

Hinton R J)1981b) Form and patterning of anterior tooth wear among aboriginal human groups.Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. in press.

Hinton R J)1981c) Temporomandibular joint size adaptations in prehistoric Tennessee Indians.Tenn. Anthrop. in press.

10.1002/ajpa.1330500305

Hinton R J, 1980, Tooth size changes in prehistoric Tennessee Indians, Human Biology, 52, 229

Hudson C, 1976, The Southeastern Indians

10.1002/jmor.1051590208

Kline G W, 1979, Paleoethnobotany of the Duck's Nest site: early Mississippian plant utilization in the Eastern Highland Rim, Tenn. Anthrop., 4, 82

Kraus B S, 1969, Dental Anatomy and Occlusion

10.1177/00220345700490042001

Lewis T M N, 1946, Hiwassee Island

10.2307/277437

Lewis T M N, 1961, Eva: An Archaic Site

Magennis A L)1977)Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley. Unpublished M. A. Thesis University of Tennessee Knoxville.

Marquardt W H, 1974, Archaeology of the Mammoth Cave Area, 193

McCollough M C R, 1973, Supplementary chronology for the Higgs site )40L045), with an assessment of terminal Archaic living and structure floors, Tenn. Arch., 29, 63

McCollough M C RandFaulkner C H)1973)Excavation of the Higgs and Doughty Sites: I‐75 Salvage Archaeology. Tennessee Archaeological Society Miscellaneous Paper No. 12.

10.1111/j.1365-2494.1969.tb01076.x

10.1016/0002-9416(79)90206-9

Molnar S)1968)Some Functional Interpretations of Tooth Wear in Prehistoric and Modern Man. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of California Santa Barbara.

10.2307/278670

10.1002/ajpa.1330340204

10.1111/j.1469-7998.1965.tb05205.x

10.1016/0003-9969(67)90168-9

10.1016/0003-9969(70)90093-2

Moyers R E, 1973, Handbook of Orthodontics

Neter J, 1974, Applied Linear Statistical Models

10.1902/jop.1967.38.3.222

Parham K E)n.d.)The Physical Anthropology of the Dallas People from Toqua )40MR6). M. A. Thesis in preparation Department of Anthropology University of Tennessee Knoxville.

10.1016/0003-9969(62)90003-1

10.1016/0003-9969(64)90020-2

10.1016/0003-9969(73)90002-2

10.1179/bjo.1.3.105

10.1016/0003-9969(80)90154-5

10.2307/278674

Robison N D, 1978, Fifth Report of the Normandy Archaeological Project. Report of Investigations No. 20, 498

Schoenwetter J, 1974, Archaeology of the Mammoth Cave Area, 49

Schroedl GFandPolhemus RF)1977)A summary and preliminary interpretation of archaeological investigations at the Toqua size )40MR6). Report submitted to the National Park Service.

Shea A B, 1978, Fifth Report of the Normandy Archaeological Project. Report of Investigations No. 20, 596

10.1002/ajpa.1330470106

10.1159/000144753

Smith F H, 1980, Skeletal Biology of Aboriginal Populations in the Southeastern United States, 81

Swanton J R)1946) The Indians of the Southeastern United States.Bur. Am. Ethnol. Bull.137.

10.1159/000142406

10.1016/0003-9969(77)90112-1

10.1002/ajpa.1330480115

Ward S)1974)Form and Function in Primate Jaw Mechanics: An Experimental Analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation Washington University St. Louis.

Watson P J, 1974, Archaeology of the Mammoth Cave Area, 233

10.1016/0002-9416(51)90101-7

10.1016/0003-9969(77)90096-6

White T D)1977)The Anterior Mandibular Corpus of Early African Hominidae: Functional Significance of Size and Shape. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Michigan Ann Arbor.

10.1002/ajpa.1330340206

Wolpoff M H, 1975, Determinants of Mandibular Form and Growth. Monograph Number 4, Craniofacial Growth Series, 1

Yarnell R A, 1969, Contents of human paleofeces

Yarnell R A, 1974, Archaeology of the Mammoth Cave Area, 113

Yarnell R A, 1977, Origins of Agriculture, 861, 10.1515/9783110813487.861

10.1016/0022-3913(65)90094-6

10.1152/jappl.1950.3.1.45