Development of simulation education debriefing protocol with faculty guide for enhancement clinical reasoning
Tóm tắt
The clinical environments are more complex, diverse and rapidly changing. Patients’ conditions were chronic and complexed, healthcare providers require clinical reasoning for patient safety care. One of the learning methods to foster clinical reasoning is simulation education. The aim of this study was to develop a simulation education debriefing protocol that can improve clinical reasoning. This study was conducted following steps. For the first step, the literature review was performed to constitute a preliminary debriefing protocol. Secondly, content validity was evaluated by five simulation learning experts. Thirdly, in-depth interview was conducted to re-examine content validity with education experts. Finally, the final debriefing protocol was applied to 7 undergraduate nursing students to examine feasibility of the protocol. The protocol consisted of debriefing steps, learning outcome, clinical reasoning attributes, core questions and guideline for instructor. Results of applicability of debriefing protocol represented that participants mentioned their reasoning competency was improved and understood the overall flow of reasoning. The debriefing protocol is important to educate healthcare providers ‘clinical reasoning. It would be able to contribute to develop healthcare providers’ clinical competencies.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Yusoff K. Medical education–reflections for the future. J Clin Health Sci. 2017;2:4–7.
Jensen R. Clinical reasoning during simulation: comparison of student and faculty ratings. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013;13(1):23–8.
Higgs J, Jensen GA, Loftus S, Christensen N. Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions. 4th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018.
Simmons B. Clinical reasoning: concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(5):1151–8.
Banning M. Clinical reasoning and its application to nursing: concepts and research studies. Nurse Educ Pract. 2008;8(3):177–83.
Levett-Jones T, Hoffman K, Dempsey J, Jeong SY, Noble D, Norton CA, Roche J, Hickey N. The ‘five rights’ of clinical reasoning: an educational model to enhance nursing students’ ability to identify and manage clinically ‘at risk’ patients. Nurse Educ Today. 2010;30(6):515–20.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. Essentials of college and university education for professional nursing. Washington, DC: Author; 2008.
Alfaro-LeFevre R. Applying nursing process: the foundation for clinical reasoning: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
Benner P, Sutphen M, Leonard V, Day L. Educating nurses: a call for radical transformation, vol. 15: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
Kwon IS, Seo YM. Nursing students’ needs for clinical nursing education. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2012;18(1):25–33.
Lee JH, Choi M. Evaluation of effects of a clinical reasoning course among undergraduate nursing students. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2011;23(1):1–9.
Nehring WM, Lashley FR. Nursing simulation: a review of the past 40 years. Simul Gaming. 2009;40(4):528–52.
Jeffries PR. A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005;26(2):96–103.
Dreifuerst KT. The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: a concept analysis. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009;30(2):109–14.
Arafeh JM, Hansen SS, Nichols A. Debriefing in simulated-based learning: facilitating a reflective discussion. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2010;24(4):302–9 quiz 310-301.
Dreifuerst KT. Debriefing for meaningful learning: fostering development of clinical reasoning through simulation. Indiana University. 2010.
Owen H, Follows V. GREAT simulation debriefing. Med Educ. 2006;40(5):488–9.
Petranek CF, Corey S, Black R. Three levels of learning in simulations: participating, debriefing, and journal writing. Simul Gaming. 1992;23(2):174–85.
Cheng A, Grant V, Dieckmann P, Arora S, Robinson T, Eppich W. Faculty development for simulation programs: five issues for the future of debriefing training. Simul Healthc. 2015;10(4):217–22.
Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007;2(2):115–25.
Grant JS, Dawkins D, Molhook L, Keltner NL, Vance DE. Comparing the effectiveness of video-assisted oral debriefing and oral debriefing alone on behaviors by undergraduate nursing students during high-fidelity simulation. Nurse Educ Pract. 2014;14(5):479–84.
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: principles and methods: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382–5.
Krueger RA: Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 5th ed: Sage publications; 2015.
Higuchi KA, Donald JG. Thinking processes used by nurses in clinical decision making. J Nurs Educ. 2002;41(4):145–53.
Benner P. From novice to expert. Am J Nurs. 1982;82(3):402–7.
Piaget J: The development of thought: equilibration of cognitive structures. (Trans A. Rosin): Viking; 1977.
Kautz DD, Kuiper R, Pesut DJ, Knight-Brown P, Daneker D. Promoting clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing students: application and evaluation of the Outcome Present State Test (OPT) model of clinical reasoning. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2005;2 Article 1.
Lasater K. Clinical judgment development: using simulation to create an assessment rubric. J Nurs Educ. 2007;46(11):496–503.
Tanner CA. Thinking like a nurse: a research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45(6):204–11.
Schwab JJ. Science, curriculum, and liberal education: selected essays: University of Chicago Press; 1982.
Flavell JH: Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. Metacognition, motivation, and understanding 1987:21–29.
Overstreet M. Ee-chats: the seven components of nursing debriefing. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2010;41(12):538–9.
Cheng A, Eppich W, Grant V, Sherbino J, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2014;48(7):657–66.
Fosnot CT: Constructivism: theory, perspectives, and practice, 2nd ed: Teachers College press; 2013.
Richardson V: Constructivist teacher education: building a world of new understandings: Routledge; 2005.
Dreifuerst KT. Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. J Nurs Educ. 2012;51(6):326–33.
Dennick R. Constructivism: reflections on twenty five years teaching the constructivist approach in medical education. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:200–5.
Cheng A, Morse KJ, Rudolph J, Arab AA, Runnacles J, Eppich W. Learner-centered debriefing for health care simulation education: lessons for faculty development. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(1):32–40.
Johnson-Russell J, Bailey C: Facilitated debriefing. High-fidelity patient simulation in nursing education 2010:369–385.
Rhodes ML, Curran C. Use of the human patient simulator to teach clinical judgment skills in a baccalaureate nursing program. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005;23(5):256–62 quiz 263-254.
Hunter LA. Debriefing and feedback in the current healthcare environment. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016;30(3):174–8.