Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling

International Journal of Climatology - Tập 33 Số 1 - Trang 121-131 - 2013
John T. Abatzoglou1
1Department of Geography University of Idaho Moscow ID USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Landscape‐scale ecological modelling has been hindered by suitable high‐resolution surface meteorological datasets. To overcome these limitations, desirable spatial attributes of gridded climate data are combined with desirable temporal attributes of regional‐scale reanalysis and daily gauge‐based precipitation to derive a spatially and temporally complete, high‐resolution (4‐km) gridded dataset of surface meteorological variables required in ecological modelling for the contiguous United States from 1979 to 2010. Validation of the resulting gridded surface meteorological data, using an extensive network of automated weather stations across the western United States, showed skill comparable to that derived from interpolation using station observations, suggesting it can serve as suitable surrogate for landscape‐scale ecological modelling across vast unmonitored areas of the United States. Copyright © 2011 Royal Meteorological Society

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abatzoglou JT, 2011, A Comparison of Statistical Downscaling Methods Suited for Wildfire Applications, International Journal of Climatology

10.1175/2009JAMC2062.1

10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0556:IOIOMS>2.0.CO;2

AllenRG PereiraLS RaesD SmithM.1998.Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig. and Drain. Paper 56 Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome Italy.300.

Bailey RG, 1995, Ecosystem Geography:

BrownTJ HorelJD McCurdyGD FearonMG.2011.What is the Appropriate RAWS Network?CEFA Report 11‐01 April 2011 97.

10.1029/2002JD003118

10.1002/joc.1322

10.1002/joc.2007

Daly C, 2008, Physiographically‐sensitive mapping of temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States, International Journal of Climatology

DeemingJE BurganRE CohenJD.1978.The National Fire‐Danger Rating System—1978. Revisions to the 1978 National Fire‐Danger Rating System. General Technical Report INT‐39. Ogden UT: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station;63.

10.1175/2007JAMC1356.1

10.1175/2010JAMC2375.1

10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<1580:CASCND>2.0.CO;2

10.1175/JHM420.1

10.1029/2008JD010201

10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.03.011

10.1029/2010WR009874

JaksaWA NussKM SridharV.2011.Effects of coupling in understanding the surface energy balance in the Snake River basin Idaho. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress Palm Springs California May 22–26 2011.

Jensen ME, 1990, Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements, 360

10.1029/1999RG900002

10.1016/S0168-1923(96)02366-0

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1993.tb03245.x

10.1175/2100.1

Littell JS, 2011, U.S. National Forests adapt to climate change through science‐management partnerships, Climatic Change.

10.1029/2008JD009879

10.1890/ES10-00192.1

10.1175/BAMS-87-3-343

10.1175/2010EI363.1

10.1029/2003JD003823

10.1890/08-0134.1

10.1029/2008GL034026

10.1029/2010JD014769

10.1029/2004JD005047

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199809)18:11<1169::AID-JOC309>3.0.CO;2-U

10.1175/BAMS-88-6-913

10.1029/2002JD003301

10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.02.007

Root TL, 2003, Scaling Issues in Integrated Assessment, Lisse, 179

10.1139/x87-081

10.1002/1097-0088(20000630)20:8<929::AID-JOC557>3.0.CO;2-5

10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00109-0

10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03128-9

10.2984/64.2.199

10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1936:VOMPIT>2.0.CO;2

10.1002/qj.49711247316

10.1002/joc.3370150207

10.1559/152304085783914686

WMO, 2008, Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation, 677