Development of a vibration haptic simulator for shoulder arthroplasty
Tóm tắt
Glenoid reaming is a technically challenging step during shoulder arthroplasty that could possibly be learned during simulation training. Creation of a realistic simulation using vibration feedback in this context is innovative. Our study focused on the development and internal validation of a novel glenoid reaming simulator for potential use as a training tool. Vibration and force profiles associated with glenoid reaming were quantified during a cadaveric experiment. Subsequently, a simulator was fabricated utilizing a haptic vibration transducer with high- and low-fidelity amplifiers; system calibration was performed matching vibration peak–peak values for both amplifiers. Eight experts performed simulated reaming trials. The experts were asked to identify isolated layer profiles produced by the simulator. Additionally, experts’ efficiency to successfully perform a simulated glenoid ream based solely on vibration feedback was recorded. Cadaveric experimental cartilage reaming produced lower vibrations compared to subchondral and cancellous bones (
$$p\le 0.03$$
). Gain calibration of a lower-fidelity (3.5
$${g}_{\mathrm{pk-pk}}, 0.36\,{g}_{\mathrm{rms}})$$
and higher-fidelity (3.4
$${g}_{\mathrm{pk-pk}}, 0.33\,{g}_{\mathrm{rms}})$$
amplifier resulted in values similar to the cadaveric experimental benchmark (3.5
$${g}_{\mathrm{pk-pk}}, 0.30\,{g}_{\mathrm{rms}})$$
. When identifying random tissue layer samples, experts were correct
$$52\pm 9\%$$
of the time and success rate varied with tissue type (
$$p=0.003$$
). During simulated reaming, the experts stopped at the targeted subchondral bone with a success rate of
$$78\pm 24\%$$
. The fidelity of the simulation did not have an effect on accuracy, applied force, or reaming time (
$$p>0.05$$
). However, the applied force tended to increase with trial number (
$$p=0.047$$
). Development of the glenoid reaming simulator, coupled with expert evaluation furthered our understanding of the role of haptic vibration feedback during glenoid reaming. This study was the first to (1) propose, develop and examine simulated glenoid reaming, and (2) explore the use of haptic vibration feedback in the realm of shoulder arthroplasty.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Wirth MA, Rockwood JCA (1996) Complications of total shoulder-replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:603–616
Matsen FA III, Clinton J, Lynch J, Bertelsen A, Richardson ML (2008) Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 90:885–896
Williams GR, Wong KL, Pepe MD, Tan V, Silverberg D, Ramsey ML, Karduna A, Iannotti JP (2001) The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translations, range of motion, and subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elb Surg 10:399–409
Nguyen D, Ferreira LM, Brownhill JR, King GJW, Drosdowech DS, Faber KJ, Johnson JA (2009) Improved accuracy of computer assisted glenoid implantation in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in-vitro randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18:907–914
Aggarwal R, Tully A, Grantcharov T, Larsen CR, Miskry T, Farthing A, Darzi A (2006) Virtual reality simulation training can improve technical skills during laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 113:1382–1387
Akhtar K, Sugand K, Sperrin M, Cobb J, Standfield N, Gupte C (2015) Training safer orthopedic surgeons. Construct validation of a virtual-reality simulator for hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthop 86:616–621
Cohen AR, Lohani S, Manjila S, Natsupakpong S, Brown N, Cavusoglu MC (2013) Virtual reality simulation: basic concepts and use in endoscopic neurosurgery training. Child’s Nerv Syst 29:1235–1244
Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR (2008) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 95:1088–1097
Larsen CR, Grantcharov T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Soerensen JL, Ottesen B (2008) Objective assessment of surgical competence in gynaecological laparoscopy: development and validation of a procedure-specific rating scale. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 115:908–916
Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Schroeder TV, Ottesen BS (2009) Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ Br Med J 338:1253–1256
Bajka M, Tuchschmid S, Fink D, Székely G, Harders M (2010) Establishing construct validity of a virtual-reality training simulator for hysteroscopy via a multimetric scoring system. Surg Endosc 24:79–88
Khalifa YM, Bogorad D, Gibson V, Peifer J, Nussbaum J (2006) Virtual reality in ophthalmology training. Surv Ophthalmol 51:259–273
Basdogan C, Sedef M, Harders M, Wesarg S (2007) VR-based simulators for training in minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 27:54–66
Prystowsky JB, Regehr G, Rogers DA, Loan JP, Hiemenz LL, Smith KM (1999) A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement. Am J Surg 177:171–175
Atesok K, Mabrey JD, Jazrawi LM, Egol KA (2012) Surgical simulation in orthopaedic skills training. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20:410–422
Pinto ML, Sabater JM, Sofrony J, Badesa FJ, Rodriguez J, Garcia N (2010) Haptic simulator for training of total knee replacement. In: 3rd IEEE RAS and EMBS international conference on IEEE, pp 221–226
Cannon WD, Eckhoff DG, Garrett JWE, Hunter RE, Sweeney HJ (2006) Report of a group developing a virtual reality simulator for arthroscopic surgery of the knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:21–29
Rebolledo BJ, Hammann-Scala J, Leali A, Ranawat AS (2015) Arthroscopy skills development with a surgical simulator: a comparative study in orthopaedic surgery residents. Am J Sports Med 43:1526–1529
Meyer RD, Tamarapalli JR, Lemons JE (1993) Arthroscopy training using a “Black box” technique. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 9:338–340
Martin KD, Cameron K, Belmont PJ, Schoenfeld A, Owens BD (2012) Shoulder arthroscopy simulator performance correlates with resident and shoulder arthroscopy experience. J Bone Joint Surg 94:e160
Carter FJ, Schijven MP, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Francis NK, Hanna GB, Jakimowicz JJ (2005) Work Group for Evaluation and Implementation of Simulators and Skills Training P. Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc 19:1523–1532
McMahan W, Gewirtz J, Standish D, Martin P, Kunkel JA, Lilavois M, Wedmid A, Lee DI, Kuchenbecker KJ (2011) Tool contact acceleration feedback for telerobotic surgery. IEEE Trans Haptics 4:210–220
Koehn JK, Kuchenbecker KJ (2015) Surgeons and non-surgeons prefer haptic feedback of instrument vibrations during robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 29:2970–2983
Tsai C-H, Tsai M-D, Hsieh M-S (2007) Bone drilling haptic interaction for orthopedic surgical simulator. Comput Biol Med 37:1709–1718
Van QH, Harders M (2017) Augmenting contact stiffness in passive haptics—preliminary results with twisted string actuation. In: IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), pp 148–153
Wang Q, Chen H, Wu W, Qin J, Heng PA (2012) Impulse-based rendering methods for haptic simulation of bone-burring. IEEE Trans Haptics 5:344–355
Singapogu RB, Pagano CC, Burg TC, Dorn PG, Zacharia R, Lee D (2014) Perceptually salient haptic rendering for enhancing kinesthetic perception in virtual environments. J Multimodal User Interfaces 8:319–331
Van Der Westebring Putten EP, Jakimowicz JJ, Dankelman J (2008) Haptics in minimally invasive surgery—a review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 17:3–16
Singapogu R, Burg T, Burg KJL, Smith DE, Eckenrode AH (2014) A perspective on the role and utility of haptic feedback in laparoscopic skills training. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 42:293–318
Kapoor S, Arora P, Kapoor V, Jayachandran M, Tiwari M (2014) Haptics–touchfeedback technology widening the horizon of medicine. J Clin Diagn Res 8:294
Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG (2007) Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cells Mater (ECM) 13:1–10
Aerssens J, Boonen S, Lowet G, Dequeker J (1998) Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality: potential implications for in vivo bone research. Endocrinology 139:663–670
Longo UG, Forriol F, Campi S, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2011) Animal models for translational research on shoulder pathologies: from bench to bedside. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 19:184–193
Loewenstein WR (ed) (1971) Mechano-electric transduction in the Pacinian corpuscle. Initiation of sensory impulses in mechanoreceptors. In: Principles of receptor physiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 269–290
Karelse A, Leuridan S, Van Tongel A, Piepers IM, Debeer P, De Wilde LF (2014) A glenoid reaming study: how accurate are current reaming techniques? J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:1120–1127
Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Eriksen JR, Blirup D, Kristiansen VB, Funch-Jensen P, Darzi A (2006) An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons. Ann Surg 244:310–314
Gor M, McCloy R, Stone R, Smith A (2003) Virtual reality laparoscopic simulator for assessment in gynaecology. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 110:181–187