Development and Validation of Authorship Order Score (AOS) for Scientific Publication

Health Professions Education - Tập 6 - Trang 434-443 - 2020
Nazish Masud1, Emad Masuadi1, Afaf Moukaddem1, Aamir Omair1, Mohamud Mohamud1, Mohammad Al Dubayee2, Alaa Althubaiti3, Mohammad Khabti Alnamshan4, Manal Bawazeer5, Mohammed I. AlJasser1
1Research unit, Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh Saudi Arabia
2College of Public Health Science and Health Informatics, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh Saudi Arabia
3Research unit, Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah Saudi Arabia
4Department of Pediatrics, King Abdullah Specialist Children Hospital, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs Riyadh Saudi Arabia
5Department of Pediatric Surgery, King Abdullah Specialized Children Hospital and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Larsen, 2010, The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index, Scientometrics, 84, 575, 10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z Teixeira, 2016, Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: ethical challenges, ghost and guest/gift authorship, and the cultural/disciplinary perspective, Sci Eng Ethics, 22, 1457, 10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3 Macfarlane, 2017, The ethics of multiple authorship: power, performativity and the gift economy, Stud High Educ, 42, 1194, 10.1080/03075079.2015.1085009 Camp, 2013, Authorship proliferation in the orthopedic literature, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 95, e44, 10.2106/JBJS.L.00519 Sugrue, 2015, Authorship proliferation in hand surgery research: how many hand surgeons does it take to write a research?, J Hand Microsurg, 7, 108, 10.1007/s12593-015-0175-5 Grobbee, 2016, On scientific authorship: proliferation, problems and prospects, Eur J Prev Cardiol, 23, 790, 10.1177/2047487316642383 Yuan, 2010, Authorship characteristics in prosthodontic literature: proliferation and internalization. A review and analysis following a 10-year observation, J Prosthet Dent, 104, 158, 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60113-8 2018 Winston, 1985, A suggested procedure for determining order of authorship in research publications, J Counsel Dev, 63, 515, 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1985.tb02749.x Bhopal, 1997, Authorship. Team approach to assigning authorship order is recommended, BMJ, 314, 1046 Ahmed, 1997, A method for assigning authorship in multiauthored publications, Fam Med, 29, 42 Feeser, 2008, The ethical assignment of authorship in scientific publications: issues and guidelines, Acad Emerg Med, 15, 963, 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00239.x Clement, 2014, Authorship matrix: a rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific publications, Sci Eng Ethics, 20, 345, 10.1007/s11948-013-9454-3 Warrender, 2016, A simple framework for evaluating authorial contributions for scientific contributions, Sci Eng Ethics, 22, 1419, 10.1007/s11948-015-9719-0 Hsu, 2007, The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus, Practical Assess Res Eval, 12, e1 Vaismoradi, 2013, Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study, Nurs Health Sci, 15, 398, 10.1111/nhs.12048 Thangaratinam, 2005, The Delphi technique, Obstet Gynaecol, 7, 120, 10.1576/toag.7.2.120.27071 Haddad, 2015, The development and psychometric properties of a measure of clinicians' attitudes to depression: the revised Depression Attitude Questionnaire (R-DAQ), BMC Psychiatr, 15, 7, 10.1186/s12888-014-0381-x Osborne, 2014 Santos, 1999, Cronbach's alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales, J Ext, 37, 1 Tavakol, 2011, Making sense of Cronbach's alpha, Int J Med Educ, 2, 53, 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd Bartlett, 1954, A note on the multiplying factors for various χ 2 approximations, J R Stat Soc Series B (Methodological), 296, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00174.x Costello, 2005, Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis, Practical Assess Res Eval, 10, 173 Bhandari, 2014, Perceptions of authors' contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author, J Clin Epidemiol, 67, 1049, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.006 Duffy, 2017, Last and corresponding authorship practices in ecology, Ecol Evol, 7, 8876, 10.1002/ece3.3435 Kassis, 2017, How do research faculty in the biosciences evaluate paper authorship criteria?, PloS One, 12, 10.1371/journal.pone.0183632 Tscharntke, 2007, Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications, PLoS Biol, 5, e18, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018 Jawad, 2013, Research ethics: authorship and publication, J Pakistan Med Assoc, 63, 1560 Schmidt, 1987, A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles, Bull Ecol Soc Am, 68, 8, 10.2307/20166549 Kosslyn, 2002 Verhagen, 2003, QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors, Nature, 426, 602, 10.1038/426602a Dotson, 2013, Equal contributions and credit assigned to authors in pharmacy journals, Am J Pharmaceut Educ, 77, 39, 10.5688/ajpe77239 Petroianu, 2012, Distribution of authorship in a scientific work, Arq Bras Cir Dig, 25, 60, 10.1590/S0102-67202012000100014