Development and Use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ballantyne, R., Bain, J., and Packer, J. (1999). Researching university teaching in Aus-tralia: Themes and issues in academics’ reflections. Stud. Higher Educ.24: 237–257.
Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. Br. J. Educ. Psychol.48: 266–279.
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying,Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University,SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham.
Burroughs-Lange, S. G. (1996). University lecturers’ concept of their role. Higher Educ. Res. Dev. 15: 29–49.
Dunkin, M. J., and Precians, R. P. (1992). Award-winning university teachers’ conceptions of teaching. Higher Educ.24: 483–502.
Entwistle, N. J., and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning,Croom Helm, London.
Entwistle, N. J., and Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching and pref-erences for contrasting academic environments, Higher Educ.19: 169–194.
Gibbs, G., and Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teach-ing skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learn. Higher Educ.5: 87–100.
Gow, L., and Kember, D. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning. Br. J. Educ. Psychol.63: 20–33.
Kane, R., Sandretto, S., and Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of re-search on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Rev. Educ. Res.72: 177–228.
Kember, D., Kwan, K.-P., and Ledesma, J. (2001). Conceptions of good teaching and how they influence the way adults and school leavers are taught. Int. J. Lifelong Educ.20: 393–404.
Hativa, N. (2000). Becoming a better teacher: A case of changing the pedagogical knowledge and beliefs of law professors. Instr. Sci.28: 491–523.
McLean, M., and Blackwell, R. (1997). Opportunity knocks? Professionalism and excellence in university teaching. Teach. Teach Theor. Pract.3: 85–99.
Martin, E., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., Lueckenhausen, G., and Ramsden, P. (2001). Us-ing phenomenography and metaphor to explore academics’ understanding of subject matter and teaching. In Rust, C. (ed.), Improving Student Learning: Improving stu-dent learning strategically,Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford, pp. 325–336.
Marton, F. (1994). Phenomenography. In T. Husén and T. N. Postlethwaite (eds), The In-ternational Encyclopedia of Education, 2nd edn, Vol 8, Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 4424–4429.
Marton, F., Hounsell, D., and Entwistle, N. (eds.) (1997). The Experience of Learning, 2nd edn., Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh.
Marton, F., and S¨alj¨o, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning, outcome and process I and II, Br. J. Educ. Psychol.46: 4–11, 115–127.
Marton, F., and S¨alj¨o, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D., and Entwistle, N. (eds.), The Experience of Learning, 2nd edn., Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh.
Menges, R. J., and Rando, W. C. (1989). What are your assumptions? Improving instruction by examining theories. Coll. Teach.37: pp54–60.
Mertz, N., and McNeely, S. (1990). How professors’ “learn” to teach: Teacher cognitions, teaching paradigms and teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
Meyer, J. H. F., and Muller, M. W. (1990). Evaluating the quality of student learn-ing.I—An unfolding analysis of the association between perceptions of learning con-text and approaches to studying at an individual level, Stud. Higher Educ.15: 131–154.
Pratt, D. D. (1998). Five Perspectives on Teaching in Adult and Higher Education, Krieger Publishing, Malabar, Florida.
Preacher, K. J., and MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine. Understand. Stat.2: 13–43.
Prosser, M., and Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education, SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham.
Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Stud. Higher Educ.16: 129–150.
Ramsden, P. (1997). The context of learning in academic departments. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D., and Entwistle, N. (eds.), The Experience of Learning, 2nd edn., Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh.
Reinsmith, W. A. (1992). Archetypal Forms of Teaching: A Continuum, Greenwood Press, New York.
Samuelowicz, K., and Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Educ.41: 299–325.
Scott, S. M., Chovanec, D. M., and Young, B. (1994). Philosophy-in-action in university teach-ing.Can. J. Higher Educ.24: 1–25.
Trigwell, K. (2002). Approaches to teaching design subjects: A quantitative analysis. Art, De-sign Commun. Higher Educ.1: 69–80.
Trigwell, K., and Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learn-ing Outcomes. (Special edition on student learning) Higher Educ.22: 251–266.
Trigwell, K., and Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in science teachers’ approach to teaching. Higher Educ.32: 77–87.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Martin, E., and Ramsden, P. (2000). Discipline differ-ences in relations between learning, teaching and ways of leading teaching depart-ments.In Rust, C. (ed.), Improving Student Learning: Improving Student Learning Through the Disciplines, Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford, pp. 502–509.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., and Martin, E. (1998). Improving student learning through a focus on the teaching context. In Rust, C. (ed.), Improving Student Learning, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford, pp. 97–103.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., and Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teach-ing first year university science. Higher Educ.27: 75–84.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., and Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ ap-proaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Educ.37: 57–70.