Developing and evaluating a dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in an EFL context
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ableeva R: The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 listening comprehension. In Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. Edited by: Lantolf P, Poehner ME. London: Equinox; 2008:57–86.
Ableeva R, Lantolf JP: Mediated dialogue and the microgenesis of second language listening comprehension. Assessment in Education 2011, 18: 133–149. 10.1177/1073191110381717
Alderson JC: Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency: The interfaces between learning and assessment. London: Continuum; 2005.
Bachman LF, Cohen AD: Language testing-SLA interfaces: An update. In Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. Edited by: Bachman LF, Cohen AD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Berne LE: How do varying pre-listening activities affect second language listening comprehension? Hispania 1995, 78: 316–329. 10.2307/345428
Bond TG, Fox CM: Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.
Brindley G, Slayter H: Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment. Language Testing 2002, 19(4):369–394. 10.1191/0265532202lt236oa
Buck G: The appropriacy of psychometric measurement models for testing second language listening comprehension. Language Testing 1994, 11(2):145–170. 10.1177/026553229401100204
Buck G, Tatsuoka K: Application of the rule-space procedure to language testing: Examining attributes of a free response listening test. Language Testing 1998, 15(2):119–157.
Canale M, Swain M: Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1980, 1(1):1–47. 10.1093/applin/1.1.1
Chalhoub-Deville M: Second language interaction: Current perspectives and future trends. Language Testing 2003, 20: 369–383. 10.1191/0265532203lt264oa
Douglas D, Selinker L: Principles for language tests within the 'discourse domains' theory of interlanguage: Research, test construction and interpretation. Language Testing 1985, 2: 205–226. 10.1177/026553228500200208
Fulcher G: Testing tasks: Issues in task design and the group oral. Language Testing 1996, 13(1):23–51. 10.1177/026553229601300103
Gass S: Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1997.
Gibbons P: Mediating Language Learning: Teacher Interactions with ESL Students in a Content-Based Classroom. TESOL Quarterly 2003, 37(2):247–273. 10.2307/3588504
Ginther A: Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli. Language Testing 2002, 19(2):133–167. 10.1191/0265532202lt225oa
Helal F: Error treatment in Tunisian EFL classes: An application of the communicative competence model. Tunisia: Unpublished DEA thesis. University of Manouba; 1997.
Hidri S: Comparison of students’ performance in dynamic vs. static listening comprehension tests among EFL learners. paper presented as work in progress in the 32nd Language Testing Research Colloquium, April 14–16, 2010 at the University of Cambridge, Crossing the threshold levels, domains and frameworks in language assessment 2010a.
Hidri S: Writing listening comprehension test items and tasks for learners of English at the tertiary level: Biasing for the Test. paper presented at the International Conference on English Language Teaching and Testing: Developments and Challenges, 22–23, April 2010, at the Higher Institute for Applied Studies in the Humanities, Zaghouan, Tunisia 2010b.
Hidri S: Assessing Static vs. Dynamic Listening: Validation of the Test Specifications. In Published PhD Dissertation. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing; 2013a.
Hidri S: The effectiveness of assessment of learning and assessment for learning in eliciting valid inferences on the test-takers’ listening comprehension ability. In article published in the Proceedings of the Nile TESOL Conference: Revolutionizing TESOL: Techniques and Strategies. Egypt: The American University in Cairo; 2013:1–25. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6bmHwcjFuVYX2FJZTFndGF0QzA/edit
Hidri S: Comparison of the students' performance in dynamic vs. static listening comprehension tests among EFL learners. article published in the Proceedings of the 19th TESOL Arabia Conference, From KG to College to Career 2014, 51–59.
Jensen C, Hansen C: The effect of prior knowledge on EAP Listening-test performance. Language Testing 1995, 12: 99–119. 10.1177/026553229501200106
Karpov YV, Haywood HC: Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky's concept of mediation: Implications for instruction. American Psychologist 1998, 53(1):27–36.
Kondo-Brown K: A FACETS analysis of rater bias in measuring Japanese second language writing performance. Language Testing 2002, 19(1):3–31. 10.1191/0265532202lt218oa
Kozulin A, Garb E: Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International 2002, 23(1):112–127. 10.1177/0143034302023001733
Lantolf P: Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of instruction and assessment. Language Teaching 2009, 42(3):355–368. 10.1017/S0261444808005569
Lantolf JP, Poehner ME: Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the pat into the future. JAL 2004, 1(1):49–72. 10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872
Lantolf JP, Poehner ME: Dynamic assessment in the foreign language classroom: A teacher's guide. Pennsylvania: CALPER University Park; 2006.
Lantolf JP, Poehner ME: The artificial development of second language ability: A sociocultural approach. In The new handbook of second language acquisition. Edited by: Ritchie WC, Bhatia TK. Bingley, UK: Emerald Press; 2009:138–159.
Lantolf JL, Poehner ME: Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research 2010, 15(1):11–35.
Leung C: Dynamic assessment: Assessment for and as teaching. Language Assessment Quarterly 2007, 4(3):257–278. 10.1080/15434300701481127
Lidz CS: Multicultural issues and dynamic assessment. In Handbook of multicultural assessment: clinical, psychological, and educational applications. 2nd edition. Edited by: Suzuki LA, Ponterotto JG, Meller PJ. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass; 2001:523–539.
Lidz CS: Mediated learning experiences (MLE) as a basis for an alternative approach to assessment. School Psychology International 2002, 23(1):68–84. 10.1177/0143034302023001731
Lidz CS, Gindis B: Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. In Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Edited by: Kozulin A, Ageev VS, Miller S, Gindis B. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003:99–116.
Lumely T, McNamara TF: Rater characteristics and rater bias: Implications for training. Language Testing 1995, 12(1):54–71. 10.1177/026553229501200104
McNamara T: Measuring second language performance. New York: Longman; 1996.
McNamara T: Language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
McNamara T: Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing 2001, 18: 333–349. 10.1177/026553220101800402
McNamara T, Roever K: Language testing: The social dimension. Oxford: Blackwell; 2006.
Ohta A: Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Edited by: Lantolf JP. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:51–78.
Poehner ME: Validity and interaction in the ZPD: Interpreting learner development through dynamic assessment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2011, 21: 244–263. 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2010.00277.x
Poehner ME, Lantolf J: Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research 2005, 9: 233–265. 10.1191/1362168805lr166oa
Poehner ME, van Compernolle RA: Frames of interaction in Dynamic Assessment: Developmental diagnoses of second language learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 2011, 18(2):183–198. 10.1080/0969594X.2011.567116
Rea-Dickins P: Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: A learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2006, 16: 164–189.
Rubin J: A review of second language listening comprehension research. Modern Language Journal 1994, 78: 199–221. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02034.x
Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko EL: Dynamic testing. The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
Swain M: The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through dynamic dialogue. In Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Edited by: Lantolf JP. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:97–114.
Swain M: Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing 2001, 18(3):275–282.
Tzuriel D: Revealing the effects of cognitive education programmes through Dynamic Assessment, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 2011, 18: 113–131.
Vandergrift L, Goh CCM, Mareschal CJ, Tafaghodtari MH: The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning 2006, 56(3):431–462. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
Vygotsky L: Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1981.
Vygotsky L: Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986.
Yi’an W: What do tests of listening comprehension test? A retrospective study of EFL test-takers performing a multiple choice task. Language Testing 1998, 15(1):21–44.