Determinants of entrepreneurial knowledge and information sharing in professional virtual learning communities created using mobile messaging apps

Naser Zamani1, Fatemeh Kazemi1, Ehsan Masoomi1
1Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Tóm tắt

There is very limited knowledge about the factors that influence entrepreneurial knowledge and information sharing in professional virtual learning communities created using mobile messaging apps. To address this gap, a survey was conducted on 165 members of agricultural entrepreneurship virtual communities created using Viber and WhatsApp. Qualitative data were also gathered through interviews with 30 virtual community members, and were analyzed to provide further understanding of the quantitative findings. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the model and the significance of relationships between the constructs. Results indicated that subjective norms affect perceived ease of use, and perceived ease of use directly and indirectly (through perceived usefulness) affect knowledge and information sharing intentions. In addition, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness indirectly (through the intentions) affect knowledge and information sharing. The findings of qualitative data analysis provided support for the influence of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness on sharing behavior. The qualitative results also revealed that subjective norms, virtual community norms and rules, and leadership play roles in encouraging or discouraging community members to participate in knowledge sharing activities. This study confirmed the validity of the technology acceptance (TAM) model for explaining knowledge and information sharing within professional virtual learning communities on mobile messaging apps, particularly when the model includes subjective norms. The current study contributes to the literature on knowledge sharing in virtual communities by focusing on virtual learning communities created using mobile messaging apps. This research also provides practical implications to improve knowledge sharing in professional virtual learning communities on mobile messaging apps.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior Hamman Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). Amos 16.0 user's guide. Chicago: SPSS, Inc..

Borrero, J. D., Shumaila, Y. Y., Javed, U., & Page, K. L. (2014). Expressive participation in internet social movements: testing the moderating effect of technology readiness and sex on student SNS use. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 39–49.

Bourhis, A., Dube, L., & Jacob, R. (2005). The success of virtual communities of practice: the leadership factor. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 23–34.

Chen, C. J., & Hung, S. W. (2010). To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management, 47, 226–236.

Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: an extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160–175.

Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information and Management, 45(5), 458–465.

Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119–135.

Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Da Silva, C., Baker, D., Shepherd, A. W., Jenane, G., & Miranda-da-Cruz, S. (Eds.). (2009). Agro-industries for development. Rome: FAO and UNIDO.

Davidsson, P. (2016). Researching entrepreneurship: conceptualization and design (2nd ed.). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Dias, C. S., Rodrigues, R. G., & Ferreira, J. J. (2019). What’s new in the research on agricultural entrepreneurship? Journal of Rural Studies, 65, 99–115.

Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29–59). New York: Routledge.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 719–734.

Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.

Gefen, D., & Ridings, C. M. (2002). Implementation team responsiveness and user evaluation of customer relationship management: a quasi-experimental design study of social exchange theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 47–70.

Giddens, J., Fogg, L., & Carlson-Sabelli, L. (2010). Learning and engagement with a virtual community by undergraduate nursing students. Nursing Outlook, 58, 261–267.

Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.

Gongla, P., & Rizzuto, C. R. (2001). Evolving communities of practice. IBM global services experience. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 842–862.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

He, W., & Wei, K. K. (2008). What drives continued knowledge sharing? An investigation of knowledge contribution and seeking beliefs. Decision Support Systems, 46(4), 826–838.

Hidayanto, A., & Setyady, S. (2014). Impact of collaborative tools utilization on group performance in university students. Turkish Online Journal Education Technology, 13(2), 88–98.

Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Florida: Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), 1–20.

Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.

Hsiao, C., Chang, J. J., & Tang, K. Y. (2016). Exploring the influential factors in continuance usage of mobile social apps: satisfaction, habit, and customer value perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 342–355.

Hsu, C., & Lu, H. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information Management, 41(7), 835–868.

Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Chang, C. M., & Yen, C. H. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: the relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2), 153–169.

Hu, P. J., Clark, T. H., & Ma, W. W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study. Information Management, 41, 227–241.

Hung, S. W., & Cheng, J. M. (2013). Are you ready for knowledge sharing? An empirical study of virtual communities. Computers & Education, 62, 8–17.

Hung, S. W., Lai, H. M., & Chou, Y. C. (2015). Knowledge-sharing intention in professional virtual communities: a comparison between posters and lurkers. The Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12), 2494–2510.

Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., & Maragahh, H. (1995). Why do individuals use computer technology? A finish case study. Information Management, 29, 227–238.

Jimenez-Zarco, A. I., Gnzalez-Gonzalez, I., Saigi, F., & Torrent-Sellens, J. (2015). The co-learning process in healthcare professionals: assessing user satisfaction in virtual communities of practice. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1303–1313.

Jin, C. H. (2014). Adoption of e-boo among college students: the perspective of an integrated TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 471–477.

Jolaee, A., Nor, K. M., Khani, N., & Yousoff, R. M. (2014). Factors affecting knowledge sharing intention among academic staff. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(4), 413–431.

Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., & Angst, C. M. (2006). Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 30(4), 781–804.

Karubanga, G., Kibwika, P., Okry, F., & Sseguya, H. (2017). How farmer videos trigger social learning to enhance innovation among smallholder rice farmers in Uganda. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 3, 1–16.

Koh, J., & Kim, Y. G. (2004). Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an e-business perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 26, 155–166.

Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.

Lee, Y., & Kwon, O. (2011). Intimacy, familiarity and continuance intention: an extended expectation–confirmation model in web–based services. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(3), 342–357.

Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information Management, 40, 191–204.

Leng, G. S., Lada, S., Muhammad, M. Z., Ibrahim, A. A. H. A., & Amboala, T. (2011). An exploration of social networking sites (SNS) adoption in Malaysia using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) And Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 16(2), 1–27.

Lin, H. C. (2014). An investigation of the effects of cultural differences on physicians’ perceptions of information technology acceptance as they related to knowledge management systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 368–380.

Lin, M. J. J., Hung, S. W., & Chen, C. J. (2009). Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 929–939.

Lin, C. H., Shih, H. Y., & Sher, P. J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: the TRAM model. Psychology & Marketing, 24(7), 641–657.

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

Nammir, D. S. S., Marane, B. M. R., & Ali, A. M. (2012). Determine the role of customer engagement on relationship quality and relationship performance. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(11), 27–36.

Nasri, W., & Charfeddine, L. (2012). Factors affecting the adoption of Internet banking in Tunisia: an integration theory of acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 23, 1–14.

Naudiyal, N., Arunachalam, K., & Kumar, U. (2019). The future of mountain agriculture amidst continual farm-exit, livelihood diversification and outmigration in the central Himalayan villages. Journal of Mountain Science, 16(4), 755–768.

Nistor, N., Baltes, B., Dacalu, M., Mihaila, D., & Smeaton, & Trausan-Matu, S. (2014). Participation in virtual academic communities of practice under the influence of technology acceptance and community factors. A learning analytics application. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 339–344.

Ozgen, E., & Minsky, B. D. (2007). Opportunity recognition in rural entrepreneurship in developing countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 11(2007), 49–73.

Papadopoulos, T., Stamati, T., & Nopparuch, P. (2013). Exploring the determinants of knowledge sharing via employee weblogs. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 133–146.

Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI): a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320.

Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2001). Techno-ready marketing: how and why your customers adopt technology. New York: Free Press.

Park, J. H., Gu, B., Lung, A. C. M., & Konana, P. (2014). An investigation of information sharing and seeking behaviours in online investment communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 1–12.

Park, J., & Gabbard, J. L. (2018). Factors that affect scientists’ knowledge sharing behavior in health and life sciences research communities: differences between explicit and implicit knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 326–355.

Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 69–103.

Pi, S. M., Chou, C. H., & Liao, H. L. (2013). A study of Facebook groups members’ knowledge sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1971–1979.

Priyadarshi, S. (2002). Reforming global trade in agriculture: a developing country perspective. Environment and development: Trade Retrieved December 15, 2005, from www.ceip.org/files/pdf/TED_2.pdf.

Punnoose, A. C. (2012). Determinants of intention to use elearning based on the technology acceptance model. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11, 301–337.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

Rolls, K., Hansen, M., Jackson, D., & Elliott, D. (2016). How health professionals use social media to create virtual communities: an integrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(6), e166. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5312.

Sobrero, P. M. (2008). Essential components for successful virtual learning communities. Journal of Extension, 46(4) Retrieved from https://joe.org/joe/2008august/a1.php.

Sohrabi Safa, N., & Von Solms, R. (2016). An information security knowledge sharing model in organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 442–451.

Tamjidyamcholo, A., Bin Baba, M. S., Mohd Shuib, N. L., & Rohani, V. A. (2014). Evaluation model for knowledge sharing in information security professional virtual community. Computers & Security, 43, 19–34.

Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Is mobile instant messaging (MIM) useful in education? Examining its technological, pedagogical, and social affordances. Educational Research Review, 21, 85–104.

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.

Triandis, H. C. (1980). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. In H. E. Howe (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 195–259). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Van Mele, P., Wanvoeke, J., & Zossou, E. (2010). Enhancing rural learning, linkages and institutions: the rice videos in Africa. Development in Practice, 20, 414–421.

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

Venkatesh, V., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D., & Morris, M. G. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Victorino, L., Karniouchina, E., & Verma, R. (2009). Exploring the use of the abbreviated Technology Readiness Index for hotel customer segmentation. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 50(3), 342–359.

Walczuch, R., Lemmink, J., & Streukens, S. (2007). The effect of service employees’ technology readiness on technology acceptance. Information & Management, 44, 206–215.

Wang, D., Xiang, Z., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2014). Adapting to the mobile world: a model of smartphone use. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 11–26.

Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 29(1), 34–56.

Xia, M., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, C. (2017). A TAM-based approach to explore the effect of online experience on destination image: a smartphone user’s perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management., 8, 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.05.002.

Zamani, N., & Mohammadi, M. (2018). Entrepreneurial learning as experienced by agricultural graduate entrepreneurs. Higher Education, 76(2), 301–316.