Detecting DNA damage in stored blood samples

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology - Tập 19 Số 1 - Trang 50-59
Kristina Schulze Johann1, Hannah Bauer1, Peter Wiegand2, Heidi Pfeiffer1, Marielle Vennemann1
1Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Münster, Röntgenstr. 23, 48149, Münster, Germany
2Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany

Tóm tắt

AbstractSeveral commercially available quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) systems enable highly sensitive detection of human DNA and provide a degradation index (DI) to assess DNA quality. From routine casework in forensic genetics, it was observed that DNA degradation in forensic samples such as blood samples stored under sub-optimal conditions leads to visible effects in multiplex analyses of short tandem repeat markers (STRs) due to decreased amplification efficiencies in longer amplicons. It was further noticed that degradation indices often remain below the value that is considered to be critical. Thus, the aim of this work was to systematically analyze this effect and to compare conventional qPCR assays with a modified qPCR approach using uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) and DNA quality assessment methods based on electrophoresis. Blood samples were stored at three different storage temperatures for up to 316 days. Significantly increased DNA recovery was observed from samples stored at high temperatures (37 °C) compared samples stored at room temperature and 4 °C. We observed typical effects of degradation in STR analyses but no correlation between DI and storage time in any of the storage conditions. Adding UNG slightly increased the sensitivity of detecting DNA degradation in one of the qPCR kits used in this study. This observation was not confirmed when using a second qPCR system. Electrophoretic systems did also not reveal significant correlations between integrity values and time. Methods for detecting DNA degradation are usually limited to the detection of DNA fragmentation, and we conclude that degradation affecting forensic STR typing is more complex.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Marrone A, Ballantyne J. Hydrolysis of DNA and its molecular components in the dry state. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2010;4:168–77.

Gates KS. An overview of chemical processes that damage cellular DNA: spontaneous hydrolysis, alkylation, and reactions with radicals. Chem Res Toxicol. 2009;22:1747–60.

Environmental Organic Chemistry for Engineers, Elsevier, 2017.

Speight JG. Hydrolysis, in: Reaction mechanisms in environmental engineering. Elsevier 2018;203–229.

Lindahl T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature. 1993;362:709–15.

Budke B, Kuzminov A. Hypoxanthine incorporation is nonmutagenic in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:6553–60.

Duncan BK, Weiss B. Specific mutator effects of ung (uracil-DNA glycosylase) mutations in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1982;151:750–5.

Schouten KA, Weiss B. Endonuclease V protects Escherichia coli against specific mutations caused by nitrous acid. Mutation Research/DNA Repair. 1999;435:245–54.

Lindahl T, Andersson A. Rate of chain breakage at apurinic sites in double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry. 1972;11:3618–23.

Butler JM. Advanced topics in forensic DNA typing: interpretation, academic press. Oxford: England, San Diego, California; 2015.

Dembinski GM, Sobieralski C, Picard CJ. Estimation of the number of contributors of theoretical mixture profiles based on allele counting: does increasing the number of loci increase success rate of estimates? Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;33:24–32.

Schmidt M, Schiller R, Anslinger K, Wiegand P, Weirich V. Statistefix 4.0: A novel probabilistic software tool, Forensic science international. Genetics. 2021;55:102570.

Ewing MM, Thompson JM, McLaren RS, Purpero VM, Thomas KJ, Dobrowski PA, DeGroot GA, Romsos EL, Storts DR. Human DNA quantification and sample quality assessment: developmental validation of the PowerQuant(®) system. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016;23:166–77.

Holmes AS, Houston R, Elwick K, Gangitano D, Hughes-Stamm S. Evaluation of four commercial quantitative real-time PCR kits with inhibited and degraded samples. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132:691–701.

Podnar J, Deiderick H, Hunicke‐Smith S. Next-generation sequencing fragment library construction. Curr Protocols Mol Biol. 2014;107:7.17.1–16.

Serrao E, Cherepanov P, Engelman AN. Amplification, Next-generation sequencing, and genomic DNA mapping of retroviral integration sites. J Vis Exp JoVE. 2016.

Morlote D, Janowski KM, Siniard RC, Guo RJ, Winokur T, DeFrank G, Harada S. Effects of improved DNA integrity by punch from tissue blocks as compared to pinpoint extraction from unstained slides on next-generation sequencing quality metrics. Am J Clin Pathol. 2019;152:27–35.

Pocernich C, Uthe J, Wong KS. Genomic DNA sizing and quality control on the Agilent Femto .Pulse System: App Note Genomics. 2017.

Bulla A, de Witt B, Ammerlaan W, Betsou F, Lescuyer P. Blood DNA yield but not integrity or methylation is impacted after long-term storage. Biopreservation and biobanking. 2016;14:29–38.

Lin S-W, Li C, Ip SCY. A performance study on three qPCR quantification kits and their compatibilities with the 6-dye DNA profiling systems. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;33:72–83.

AlRokayan SAH. Effect of storage temperature on the quality and quantity of DNA extracted from blood. Pakistan J Biol Sci. 2000;3:392–4.

Huang L-H, Lin P-H, Tsai K-W, Wang L-J, Huang Y-H, Kuo H-C, Li S-C. The effects of storage temperature and duration of blood samples on DNA and RNA qualities. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0184692.

Heinrich M, Müller M, Rand S, Brinkmann B, Hohoff C. Allelic drop-out in the STR system ACTBP2 (SE33) as a result of mutations in the primer binding region. Int J Legal Med. 2004;118:361–3.

Morrison J, McColl S, Louhelainen J, Sheppard K, May A, Girdland-Flink L, Watts G, Dawnay N. Assessing the performance of quantity and quality metrics using the QIAGEN Investigator® Quantiplex® pro RGQ kit. Sci Justice J Forensic Sci Soc. 2020;60:388–97.

Longo MC, Berninger MS, Hartley JL. Use of uracil DNA glycosylase to control carry-over contamination in polymerase chain reactions. Gene. 1990;93:125–8.

Poetsch M, Konrad H, Helmus J, Bajanowski T, von Wurmb-Schwark N. Does zero really mean nothing?-first experiences with the new PowerQuant™ system in comparison to established real-time quantification kits. Int J Legal Med. 2016;130:935–40.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology

Tập 19 Số 1

50-59

Thông tin tác giả