Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design

Journal of the Learning Sciences - Tập 11 Số 1 - Trang 105-121 - 2002
Daniel C. Edelson1
1Northwestern University

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Battista, M. T. & Clements, D. H. (2000). Mathematics curriculum development as a scientific endeavor. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research on design in mathematics and science education (pp. 737-760). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bell, P., Davis, E. A. & Linn, M. C. (1995). The Knowledge integration environment: Theory and design.Proceedings of CSCL 95: Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. xx-xx).

Brown A. L., 1992, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141, 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2

Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-272). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Carroll, J. M. (1995). Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development. New York: Wiley.

Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: 25 years of progress (pp. 455-478). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Cognition & Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Confrey, J. & Lachance, A. (2000). Transformative teaching experiments through conjecture-driven research design. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 231-265). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J. & Wager, W. W. (1992.). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

Guthrie J. T., 1997, Educational Psychologist, 32, 95, 10.1207/s15326985ep3202_4

Guzdial, M., Turns, J., Rappin, N. & Carlson, D. (1995, October). Collaborative support for learning in complex domains. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL 95: Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 157-160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Hancock C., 1992, Educational Psychologist, 27, 337, 10.1207/s15326985ep2703_5

10.1207/S15327809JLS0903_2

Jackson S. L., 1996, Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 233, 10.1080/1049482940040305

Kelly, A. E. & Lesh, R. A. (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Kreitzberg, C. (1996). Managing for usability. In A. F. Alber (Ed.), Multimedia: A management perspective (pp. 65-88). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Loh, B., Reiser, B. J., Radinsky, J., Edelson, D. C., Gomez, L. M. & Marshall, S. (2001). Developing reflective inquiry practices: A case study of software, the teacher, and students. In K. Crowley, C. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 279-323). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Muller, M. J. (1992). Retrospective on a year of participatory design using the PICTIVE technique, Proceedings of CHI 92-Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 455-462). New York: ACM.

Palincsar A. S., 1984, Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117, 10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<125::AID-TEA3>3.3.CO;2-E

Richey, R. C. & Nelson, W. A. (1996). Developmental research. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1213-1245). New York: Macmillan.

Scardamalia M., 1992, Interactive Learning Environments, 2, 45, 10.1080/1049482920020105

Schank R. C., 1993, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 305, 10.1207/s15327809jls0304_2

Schifter, D. (1996). What's happening in math class? New York: Teachers College Press.

Schon, D. A. (1990). The design process. In V. A. Howard (Ed.), Varieties of thinking: Essays from Harvard's Philosophy of Education Research Center (pp. 111-141). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Sherin, M. G. (1998). Developing teachers' ability to identify student conceptions during instruction. In S. B. Berenson, K. R. Dawkins, M. Blanton, W. N. Coulombe, J. Kolb, K. Norwood, & L. Stiff (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 761-767). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.

Simon, H. A. (1971). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sloane, K., Wilson, M. & Samson, S. (1996). Designing an embedded assessment system: From principles to practice (BEAR Report Series, SA-96-1): University of California, Berkeley.

10.1145/174809.174813

Steffe, L. P. & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research on design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-307). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1-14). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

White B. Y., 1998, Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3, 10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2