Deploying LSS in a global enterprise – project identification

International Journal of Lean Six Sigma - Tập 3 Số 3 - Trang 187-205 - 2012
BrettDuarte1, DouglasMontgomery2, JohnFowler3, JohnKonopka4
1IBM Corporation, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
2School of Computing, Infomatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
3Supply Chain Management Department, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
4IBM Corporation, Cave Creek, Arizona, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide Lean Six Sigma deployment champions with a structured approach to identify and prioritize parts of their business that are conducive to the Lean Six Sigma methodology.Design/methodology/approachA five‐step approach to Lean Six Sigma project identification is presented in this paper. The approach utilizes a clustering technique to group similar processes based on seven process characteristics. The clusters formed are then evaluated and prioritized for their compatibility to Lean Six Sigma.FindingsThe clustering approach can be applied to any industry segment, including non‐manufacturing, healthcare and financial‐based organizations. A case study is presented in this paper in which the approach is applied to an IT based company. A total of 30 percent of the business processes were found to be Lean Six Sigma conducive.Research limitations/implicationsThe current model does not have provision to consider the current performance of a process as an evaluation criterion. This requires the deployment champion to use the model in conjunction with a Balanced Scorecard. Future research will address this limitation.Originality/valueThere is a general lack of a mathematical approach to enable Lean Six Sigma practitioners to identify parts of their business that are conducive to the methodology. This research attempts to bridge this gap in the literature by using an unsupervised learning approach, using a clustering algorithm, to group processes based on seven process characteristics. The cluster evaluation helps the deployment champion identify key areas within the business to focus an LSS deployment.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abonyi, J. and Feil, B. (2007), Cluster Analysis for Data Mining and System Identification, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.

Atallah, B. and Ramudhin, A. (2010), “Improving healthcare reliability by integrating Six‐Sigma in a business process modeling and analysis strategy”, IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering & Engineering Management (IE&EM 2010), pp. 2234‐8.

Backer, E. and Jain, A. (1981), “A clustering performance measure based on fuzzy set decomposition”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 66‐75.

Banks, D., House, L., McMorris, F., Arabie, P. and Gaul, W. (2004), “Classification, clustering, and data mining applications”, Proceedings of the Meeting of International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), pp. 25‐32.

Banuelas, R., Tennant, C., Tuersley, I. and Tang, S. (2006), “Selection of Six Sigma projects in UK”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 514‐27.

Bodek, N. (2004), Kaikaku: The Power and Magic of Lean – A Study in Knowledge Transfer, PCS Press, Vancouver, WA.

Breyfogle, F.W. (2003), Implementing Six Sigma, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

Coronado, R.B. and Antony, J. (2002), “Critical success factors for the successful implementation of Six Sigma projects in organizations”, TQM Magazine, Vol. 14, pp. 92‐9.

De Mast, J. (2004), “A methodological comparison of three strategies for quality improvement”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 198‐213.

Gates, R. (2007), “Deployment: start off on the right foot”, Quality Progress, Vol. 40 No. 8, p. 51.

Goldman, H. (2005), “The origins and development of quality initiatives in American business”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 217‐25.

Hahn, G.J., Doganaksoy, N. and Hoerl, R. (2000), “The evolution of Six Sigma”, Quality Engineering, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 317‐26.

Harry, M.J. (1998), “Six Sigma: a breakthrough strategy for profitability”, Quality Progress, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 60‐4.

Hu, G., Wang, L., Fetch, S. and Bidanda, B. (2008), “A multi‐objective model for project portfolio selection to implement Lean and Six Sigma concepts”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 46 No. 23, pp. 6611‐25.

Kumar, D., Nowickib, D., Ramirez, J. and Verma, D. (2008), “On the optimal selection of process alternatives in a Six Sigma implementation”, Int. J. Production Economics, Vol. 111, pp. 456‐67.

Kumar, M. and Antony, J. (2009), “Project selection and its impact on the successful deployment of Six Sigma”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 669‐86.

Kumar, U.D., Saranga, H., Ramirez‐Marquez, J. and Nowicki, D. (2007), “Six Sigma project selection using data envelopment analysis”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 419‐41.

Linderman, K., Schroeder, R., Zaheer, S. and Choo, A. (2003), “Six Sigma: a goal‐theoretic perspective”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 21, pp. 193‐203.

Mader, D.P. (2007), “How to identify and select Lean Six Sigma projects”, Quality Progress, Vol. 40 No. 7, p. 58.

Mader, D.P. (2008), “What comes after the low‐hanging fruit?”, Quality Progress, Vol. 41 No. 8, pp. 58‐60.

Montgomery, D.C. (2009), Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 6th ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

Montgomery, D.C. (2010), “A modern framework for achieving enterprise excellence”, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 56‐65.

Montgomery, D.C. and Woodall, W.H. (2008), “An overview of Six Sigma”, International Statistical Review, Vol. 76 No. 3, pp. 329‐46.

Näslund, D. (2008), “Lean, Six Sigma and Lean sigma: fads or real process improvement methods?”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 269‐87.

Ren, X. and Zhang, G. (2008), “Research on decision support for Six Sigma project selection based on fuzzy evaluation”, 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM ), Vol. 1, pp. 1‐11.

Schroeder, R.G. (2000), “Six Sigma quality improvements: what is Six Sigma and what are the important implications?”, Proceeding of the Fourth Annual International POMS Conference, Seville, Spain, 27 August‐1 September.

Snee, R.D. and Hoerl, R. (2003), Leading Six Sigma, Prentice‐Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Snee, R.D. and Rodebaugh, W.F. (2002), “Project selection process”, Quality Progress, September, pp. 78‐90.

Spear, S. and Brown, K. (1999), “Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 77, pp. 96‐106.

Su, C.‐T. and Choua, C.‐J. (2008), “A systematic methodology for the creation of Six Sigma projects: a case study of semiconductor foundry”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 2693‐703.

Szeto, A.Y.T. and Tsang, A.H.C. (2005), “Antecedents to successful implementation of Six Sigma”, International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 307‐22.

Thomas, A.J., Rowlands, H., Byard, P. and Rowland‐Jones, R. (2008), “Lean Six Sigma: an integrated strategy for manufacturing sustainability”, International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 333‐54.

Xu, R. and Wunsch, D.C. II (2009), Clustering, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

Yang, T. and Hsieh, C.‐H. (2008), “Six‐Sigma project selection using national quality award criteria and fuzzy multiple criteria decision‐making method”, Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, WiCOM '08, 4th International Conference on 12‐14 October, pp. 1‐4.

Zhang, J. and Liu, W. (2007), “A study on implementing Six‐Sigma in banking service”, 3rd International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking, and Mobile Computing – WiCOM '07, pp. 3246‐9.

Zimmerman, J.P. and Weiss, J. (2005), “Six Sigma's seven deadly sins”, Quality, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 62‐6.

Zua, X., Fredendallb, L.D. and Douglas, T.J. (2008), “The evolving theory of quality management: the role of Six Sigma”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 630‐50.