Dental implants from functionally graded materials
Tóm tắt
Functionally graded material (FGM) is a heterogeneous composite material including a number of constituents that exhibit a compositional gradient from one surface of the material to the other subsequently, resulting in a material with continuously varying properties in the thickness direction. FGMs are gaining attention for biomedical applications, especially for implants, owing to their reported superior composition. Dental implants can be functionally graded to create an optimized mechanical behavior and achieve the intended biocompatibility and osseointegration improvement. This review presents a comprehensive summary of biomaterials and manufacturing techniques researchers employ throughout the world. Generally, FGM and FGM porous biomaterials are more difficult to fabricate than uniform or homogenous biomaterials. Therefore, our discussion is intended to give the readers about successful and obstacles fabrication of FGM and porous FGM in dental implants that will bring state‐of‐the‐art technology to the bedside and develop quality of life and present standards of care. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 101A: 3046‐3057, 2013.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Uemura S, 2003, Functionally Graded Materials Vii, 1
Watari F, 2003, Development of Functionally Graded Implant and Dental Post, for Bio‐medical Application, 321
Yokoyama A, 2000, Bioceramics, 445
Hedia HS, 2004, Design optimization of functionally graded dental implant, Bio Med Mater Eng, 14, 133
Watari F, 1998, Imaging of gradient structure of titanium/apatite functionally graded dental implant, J Jpn I Met, 62, 1095, 10.2320/jinstmet1952.62.11_1095
Takahashi H, 1993, Mechanical properties of functional gradient materials of titanium‐apatite and titanium zirconia for dental use, J Jpn Soc Dent Mater Devic, 12, 595
Takahashi H, 1992, Study of functionally gradient materials of titanium‐apatite and titanium‐silica for dental use, J Jpn Soc Dent Mater Devic, 11, 462
Benzing UR, 1995, Biomechanical aspects of two different implant‐prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, 188
Namazu T, 2005, Advances in Fracture and Strength, Pts 1–4, 574
Diamanti MV, 2011, Anodic oxidation of titanium: From technical aspects to biomedical applications, J Appl Biomater Biomech, 9, 55
Hjalmarsson L, 2011, Cellular responses to cobalt‐chrome and CP titanium—An in vitro comparison of frameworks for implant‐retained oral prostheses, Swed Dent J, 35, 177
Fujii T, 2010, Fabrication and strength evaluation of biocompatible ceramic‐metal composite materials, Key Eng Mater, 4, 1699
Fujii T, 2011, Fracture and Strength of Solids Vii, Pts 1 and 2, 100
Veerapandian M, 2009, The state of the art in biomaterials as nanobiopharmaceuticals, Dig J Nanomater Biostruct, 4, 243
Matsuno T, Fracture‐toughness of porous sintered bodies of hydroxyapatite, Chem Lett, 1992, 2335
Sykaras N, 2000, Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: Their effect on osseointegration. A literature review, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, 675
Cristache CM, 2009, Titanium as dental implant material, Metal Int, 14, 14
Hirschhorn JS, 1969, Research in Dental and Medical Materials, 137
Carlsson L, 1988, Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 3, 21
Black J, 1999, Fundamentals of Biocompatibilities, 444
Dee KC, 2004, An Introduction to Tissue‐Biomaterial Interactions
Deckard C, 1988, Process and Control Issues in Selective Laser Sintering, 191