Delayed effects of chronic variable stress during peripubertal‐juvenile period on hippocampal morphology and on cognitive and stress axis functions in rats

Hippocampus - Tập 14 Số 5 - Trang 636-648 - 2004
Ceylan Isgor1, Mohamed Kabbaj2, Huda Akil1, Stanley J. Watson1
1Mental Health Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Animal studies on the effects of chronic variable stress during the peripubertal‐juvenile period on hippocampal structure and function are lacking. Twenty‐eight‐day‐old Sprague‐Dawley rats were subjected to random, variable physical or social stress regimens for 4 weeks. Hippocampal volume was found to continue to grow in all lamina examined during the transition into young adulthood. Our variable physical stress paradigm led to inhibition of this growth in the CA1 pyramidal cell layer (PCL) and in the dentate gyrus‐granular cell layer (DG‐GCL), which reached full arrest in the CA3‐PCL. Volume deficits were first observed after chronic stress exposure when 3 weeks, but not 24 h, of recovery had elapsed. Moreover, these volume deficits were associated with impairments in the Morris water‐maze navigation, sustained downregulation in the basal hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor gene expression, and deficits in the shutdown of acute stress‐induced corticosterone secretion. Volume changes both due to normal maturation and after chronic stress exposure were independent of neuron number. Thus, a peripubertal‐juvenile chronic stress paradigm that leads to significant alterations in the limbic‐hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis can produce robust effects in hippocampal structure and cognitive ability, lasting into adulthood. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/cne.901240303

10.1126/science.7079742

10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00411-X

10.1002/cne.1040

10.1016/0304-3940(89)90588-0

10.1037/0735-7044.113.5.902

10.1016/S0149-7634(98)00031-1

10.1016/S0361-9230(01)00762-6

10.1002/cne.903130308

10.1002/cne.903130309

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-07-02492.1997

10.1073/pnas.95.6.3168

10.1038/35036235

10.3109/10826089809056256

10.3109/10826080009148417

10.1016/0896-6273(91)90234-Q

10.1210/edrv-12-2-118

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-18-06983.2000

10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00188-4

10.1016/0149-7634(81)90005-1

10.1038/386493a0

10.1037/0735-7036.112.1.65

10.1016/S0149-7634(96)00057-7

10.1016/S0169-328X(98)00130-2

10.1016/S0149-7634(03)00006-X

10.1016/0006-8993(93)90193-Q

10.1016/0006-8993(94)91778-7

10.1016/0031-9384(95)02016-0

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-10-03534.1996

10.1097/00005072-199905000-00001

10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00964-1

10.1126/science.3340858

10.1006/smns.1994.1032

10.1128/MCB.11.1.143

10.1016/B978-0-12-547620-1.50007-2

10.1210/endo-128-5-2239

Sapolsky R, 1992, Stress, the aging brain, and the mechanism of neuron death

10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00218-2

SousaN AlmeidaOFX HolsboerF Paula‐BarbosaMM MadeiraMD.1998b.Maintenance of hippocampal cell numbers in young and aged rats submitted to chronic unpredictable stress. Comparison with the effects of corticosterone treatment. Stress 2:237–250.

10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00050-6

10.1002/hipo.1101

10.1016/S0278-5846(03)00086-1

10.1016/0006-8993(92)91597-8

West MJ, 1990, Unbiased stereological estimations of the number of neurons in the human hippocampus, J Comp Neurol, 296, 1, 10.1002/cne.902960102

10.1002/ar.1092310411

10.1016/S0006-8993(02)04278-6

10.1016/0006-8993(90)90778-A