Decontamination of aflatoxin M1 in yogurt using Lactobacillus rhamnosus LC‐4

Journal of Food Safety - Tập 39 Số 5 - 2019
Guofang Zhang1, Jiadong Li2, Jinmeng Lv1, Lihua Liu3, Chun Li1, Libo Liu1
1Key Laboratory of Dairy Sciences, College of Food Sciences, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China
2Heilongjiang Green Food Research Institute, Harbin, China
3Institute of Animal Science of CAAS, Beijing, China

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis study aimed to evaluate the ability of the Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain LC‐4 to bind aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) in phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) and yogurt. Bacterial cells were subjected to heat, acid, and alkali treatments. The AFM1‐binding rate of acid‐treated bacteria was of 78.63 ± 0.52%. The binding of L. rhamnosus LC‐4 to AFM1 was partially reversible and the binding of AFM1 was more stable when treated bacteria were used. The involved components of the cell wall in AFM1 binding were determined, with peptidoglycan playing a critical role. The integrity of the bacteria was also highly important for detoxification ability, and this ability was influenced by different factors such as temperature, pH, and toxin concentration, and so on. L. rhamnosus LC‐4 retained its detoxification ability in yogurt. The pH and bacterial concentration slightly affected the binding of AFM1 to L. rhamnosus LC‐4 during storage time. These results indicate that L. rhamnosus LC‐4 may be applied to reduce the concentration of AFM1 in yogurt.Practical ApplicationsIn the present work, we determined the involved components of the cell wall in AFM1 binding and different factors influencing the binding process. The integrity of the cell wall is indispensable for AFM1 binding and peptidoglycans were critical components. Understanding the mechanism of AFM1 binding by probiotic bacteria is contributed to further optimizing decontamination processes. Our study provides potential future applications to reduce AFM1 bioavailability by L. rhamnosus LC‐4 in yogurt.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Akbarirad H., 2017, Detoxification of aflatoxin m1 (afm1) in dairy base beverages (acidophilus milk) by using different types of lactic acid bacteria‐mini review, Current Nutrition & Food Science, 13, 77

10.1016/j.bjm.2017.05.003

10.1111/1750-3841.13204

10.1016/0167-7012(95)00090-9

10.1007/s11947-011-0770-9

10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.03.002

European Commission, 2006, Commission regulation no.1881/2006 of December 19, 2006 setting maximum levels forcertain contaminants in foodstuffs, Official Journal of the European Union, 364, 5

Food and Drug Administration. (2005).Compliance program guidance manual. Retrieved fromhttp://www.fda.gov/downloads/animalveterinary/guidancecomplianceenforcement/complianceenforcement/ucm113409.pdf

10.1002/jsfa.2740650106

10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04217.x

IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. (2002)Some traditional herbal medicines some mycotoxins naphthalene and styrene. Retrieved fromhttps://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol82/mono82.pdf

10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.05.058

10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.08.040

10.3390/toxins3060551

10.1016/j.aninu.2016.07.003

10.3109/15569543.2014.922580

Kart A., 2009, Occurence of aflatoxin m1 determined by elisa in uht (sterilized) and raw milk samples produced in Turkey, Asian Journal of Chemistry, 21, 2047

10.3168/jds.2016-11264

10.1080/02652030310001639521

10.1371/journal.pone.0136045

Montaseri H., 2014, Effect of production and storage of probiotic yogurt on aflatoxin M1 residue, Journal of Food Quality and Hazards Control, 1, 7

Mukabane D. K., 2014, Effect of aflatoxin B1 on course of infection of trypanosoma congolense in mice, International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 4, 12

10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04065.x

10.1108/NFS-11-2012-0122

10.1016/j.fct.2007.10.005

10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.10.089

10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.06.037

10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.09.023

10.1016/j.tifs.2005.10.004

10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.02.001

Wang L., 2015, Identification of key factors involved in the biosorption of patulin by inactivated lactic acid bacteria (LAB) cells, PLoS One, 10, 95

10.1021/bm050968t

10.4315/0362-028X-67.6.1195

10.2174/1389557513666131211105554