Deconstructing the Reality: To what degree are the Ph.D. students using their computer(s) to support their research practices?
Tóm tắt
Under normal circumstances, it is assumed that Ph.D. students will make use of ICT (e.g., computer technologies) throughout their research journey for a variety of generic and specialised purposes. Yet, there is limited documented research about postgraduate use of ICT beyond their information sourcing skills and general knowledge consumption. This paper reports the first stage of a study that aimed to examine how Ph.D. students use their computers to support their research practice, by taking into account not only their computer use skills, but also ICT use within the broader context of the research journey. Monitoring software that harvested computer activity data over a period of three months was installed on the computers of nine doctoral students from the same university who self-reported as being skilled computer users. Regular discussion sessions were held with each student to review computer activities in the light of their own research and study contexts (Ph.D. stage and discipline background). Analysis of data gathered at this first stage of the study indicates that there is no difference among the students at any stage of their doctoral research in terms of the level of their engagement with their computers, and there is no difference in the use of computer (applications and documents) among the students despite their different discipline backgrounds. At this point in the study, there is a strong indication that while ICT are playing a dominant role in doctoral student’s daily lives, ICT use to support research practice is limited. While these students used computers daily, the computers seemed not to be as crucial to their research practice as was expected. It appears that current perceptions in research literature about the importance of computer devices for student research practice may need to be questioned. This first stage of a larger study therefore provides the basis for further investigation.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aderibigbe, N. A., & Aramide, K. A. (2006). Institutional factors and perceived usefulness as predictors of internet use by postgraduate students at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. PNLA Quarterly.
Aspden, E. J., & Thorpe, L. (2009). “Where do you learn?”: Tweeting to inform learning space development. Retrieved June, 2012, from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/where-do-you-learn-tweeting-inform-learning-space-development
Blignaut, S., & Els, J. (2010). Comperacy assessment of postgraduate students’ readiness for higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 101–107.
Butson, R., & Sim, K. N. (2013). The role of personal computers in undergraduate education. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 4(3), 1–9. doi: 10.4018/ijdldc.2013070101
Conole, G., de Laat, M., Dillon, T., & Darby, J. (2008). ‘Disruptive technologies’, ‘pedagogical innovation’: What’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology. Computers & Education, 50, 511–524. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.009
Cowan, B. (2011). ‘Digital Natives’ aren't necessarily digital learners. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Digital-Natives-Arent/129606/
Dahlstrom, E., Grunwald, P., de Boor, T., & Vockley, M. (2011). ECAR National study of students and information technology in higher education (pp. 1-54). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research: Educause.
Dange. (2010). Post Graduate Students’ Computing Confidence, Computer and Internet Usage at Kuvempu University–An Indian Study. International journal of instruction, 3(2), 39–62.
Divaris, K., Polychronopoulou, A., & Mattheos, N. (2007). An investigation of computer literacy and attitudes amongst Greek post-graduate dental students. Dental Education, 11, 144–147.
George, C. A., Bright, A., Hurlbert, T., Linke, E. C., St. Clair, G., & Stein, J. (2006). Scholarly Use of Information: Graduate Students’ Information Seeking Behaviour. University Libraries Research, 21, 1–27.
Green, A., S., Rafaeli, E., Bolger, N., Shrout, P., E., & Reis, H., T. (2006). Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 87-105. Retrieved from http://docsfiles.com/pdf_paper_or_plastic_data_equivalence_in_paper_and_electronic_diaries.html doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.87
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, Ca: Sage.
Griffiths, J. R., & Brophy, P. (2005). Student searching behavior and the web: Use of academic resources and Google. Library Trends, 53(4).
Guidry, K., & BrckaLorenz, A. (2010). A comparison of student and faculty academic technology use across disciplines. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/comparison-student-and-faculty-academic-technology-use-across-disciplines
Lawlor, B., & Donnelly, R. (2010). Using podcasts to support communication skills development: A case study for content format preferences among postgraduate research students. Computers & Education, 54(4), 962–971.
Liew, C. L., Foo, S., & Chennupati, K. R. (2000). A study of graduate student end-users’ use and perception of electronic journals. Online Information Review, 24(4), 302–315.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, G. (2003). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Y. L. N. Denzin (Ed.), The landscape of qualitative research - Theories and issues (pp. 253-276): Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
McCarthy, J. (2012). International design collaboration and mentoring for tertiary students through Facebook. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 755–775.
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Jamali, H. R., & Huntington, P. (2007). What do faculty and students really think about e-books? Retrieved August 2013, 201–3
Shaw. (2000). A Survey of Graduate Students as End Users of Computer Technology: New Roles for Faculty. Office systems research journal, 18(1), 21–40.
Smith, S. D., & Caruso, J. B. (2010). The ECAR study of undergraduateutudents and information technology, 2010 Educause (October 2010 ed., pp. 118).
Sultan, N. (2010). Cloud computing for education: A new dawn? International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), 109–116.
Sutton, A. M., & Jacoby, J. (2008). A comparative study of book and journal use in four social science disciplines. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 27(1), 1–33.
Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources: An overview and analysis of recent research studies (pp. 1-72). Washington, D.C.