Decision‐makers are resilient in the face of social exclusion

British Journal of Psychology - Tập 109 Số 3 - Trang 604-630 - 2018
Marie Juanchich1, Lukasz Walasek2, Miroslav Sirota1
1Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
2Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

Tóm tắt

A growing body of evidence suggests that social exclusion impairs people's capacity for active deliberation and logical reasoning. Building on this finding and on the postulate from the dual‐process theory that analytical thinking is essential in order to make good judgements and decisions, we hypothesized that social exclusion will alter judgement and choice behaviour. We tested this hypothesis in three experiments in which social exclusion was manipulated using the Cyberball paradigm, an online ball‐tossing game in which participants either received the ball a fair number of times or were excluded by the other two players. We focused on a range of tasks designed to be sensitive to participants’ ability to engage in analytical thinking and careful deliberation, including the cognitive reflection test (Experiment 1) and a set of anchoring, intertemporal preference, disjunction, and confidence tasks (experiments 2 and 3). Our results unanimously failed to support the hypothesis that social exclusion influences people's judgements and decision‐making. We discuss the implications of our findings for social exclusion theory.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Albaity M., 2014, Cognitive reflection test and behavioral biases in Malaysia, Malaysia, 9, 149

10.1016/j.jebo.2012.08.004

10.1162/00335530360535153

10.1037/dec0000043

Bargh J., 1994, Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes; applications, 1040

Baumeister R. F., 2005, The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying, 53

10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.589

10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.817

10.1111/jeea.12055

10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.267

10.1080/13803390500507196

10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938

10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.051

10.1016/j.jesp.2016.07.006

10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.1

10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116

Campitelli G., 2010, Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices, Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 182, 10.1017/S1930297500001066

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02158.x

10.1177/0956797613504966

10.1177/0963721411417545

10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.012

10.1126/science.1089134

10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390

10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629

10.1257/089533005775196732

10.1257/jel.40.2.351

Gal P., 2014, The cognitive reflection test and the propensity to use heuristics in decision making, Comenius Management Review., 8, 29

10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01158.x

Ghazal S., 2014, Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition, Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 15, 10.1017/S1930297500004952

10.1017/CBO9780511808098

10.1002/ejsp.1851

10.1080/17405629.2011.638815

10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.015

10.1177/01461672952111004

Janda L., 1996, The psychologist's book of self‐tests

10.1002/bdm.1875

10.1006/obhd.1994.1013

Kahneman D., 2005, A model of heuristic judgment, The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, 267

10.1257/jep.5.1.193

10.1002/9780470752937.ch5

10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75

10.1002/bdm.752

10.1017/CBO9780511618031

10.1080/08959285.2010.501046

10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42

Morey R. D. Rouder J. N. Jamil T. &Morey M. R. D.(2015).Package ‘BayesFactor’. Retrieved fromhttp://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/BayesFactor.pdf

Noori M., 2016, Cognitive reflection as a predictor of susceptibility to behavioral anomalies, Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 114, 10.1017/S1930297500007634

10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.018

10.1177/0963721415604610

Plessner H., 2008, Intuition in judgment and decision making, 251

10.1073/pnas.1524187113

10.1196/annals.1399.007

10.1037/ebs0000062

10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00034-4

10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00532

10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3

10.1017/CBO9780511808098.024

10.4324/9781410603432

10.1017/S0140525X00003435

10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.437

10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008

10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00237.x

10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1

10.1080/13546783.2013.844729

10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293

10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.606

10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.409

10.1177/1368430210389084

10.18637/jss.v036.i03

Walasek L., 2018, Adaptive cooperation in the face of social exclusion

10.1016/j.socec.2015.04.012

10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.005

10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

Welsh M. B. Burns N. R. &Delfabbro P. H.(2013).The Cognitive Reflection Test: how much more than Numerical Ability?Paper presented at the CogSci 2013 Proceedings.

10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641

10.4135/9781412958479.n384

10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748

10.3758/BF03192765

10.1177/0146167297237003

10.1093/scan/nsx139

10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006

10.1037/a0026316

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

British Journal of Psychology

Tập 109 Số 3

604-630

Thông tin tác giả