DOES PERFORMANCE IMPROVE FOLLOWING MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK? A THEORETICAL MODEL, META‐ANALYSIS, AND REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS

Personnel Psychology - Tập 58 Số 1 - Trang 33-66 - 2005
James W. Smither1, Manuel London2, Richard B. Reilly3
1La Salle University,
2State University of New York at Stony Brook
3Stevens Inst of Tech

Tóm tắt

We review evidence showing that multisource feedback ratings are related to other measures of leadership effectiveness and that different rater sources conceptualize performance in a similar manner. We then describe a meta‐analysis of 24 longitudinal studies showing that improvement in direct report, peer, and supervisor ratings over time is generally small. We present a theoretical framework and review empirical evidence suggesting performance improvement should be more likely for some feedback recipients than others. Specifically, improvement is most likely to occur when feedback indicates that change is necessary, recipients have a positive feedback orientation, perceive a need to change their behavior, react positively to the feedback, believe change is feasible, set appropriate goals to regulate their behavior, and take actions that lead to skill and performance improvement.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01600.x

10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043

10.1002/hrdq.3920060206

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00133.x

*AtwaterLE BrettJ. (2003). Unpublished data.

Atwater LE, Antecedents and consequences of reactions to 360‐degree feedback, Journal of Vocational Behavior

Atwater LE, 2004, 360 degree feedback to managers: Does it result in changes in employee attitudes?

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01745.x

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00202.x

*Avery K, 2000, The effects of 360 degree feedback over time

*Bailey C, 2003, 360‐degree feedback and developmental outcomes: The role of feedback characteristics, self‐efficacy, and importance of feedback dimensions to focal managers' current role

10.1002/job.167

Bandura A, 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory

10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L

*Bernardin HJ, 1995, The effects of a 360‐degree appraisal system on managerial performance

10.1177/1059601197222006

10.1037/e518712013-212

Bonnett KL, 1995, Transfer of training: The effect of accountability and the role of upward feedback

Brett JF, 2001, 360‐degree feedback: Accuracy, reactions and perceptions of usefulness, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 930, 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.930

10.1006/obhd.2001.2972

*Brooks JH, 2000, An examination of ratings congruence and organizational level on longitudinal multi‐source feedback ratings

Brutus S, 2002, Rater selection in multi‐source assessment: Evidence for the use of different strategies

10.1108/02621719910293774

Bryk AS, 2001, Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods

Buckingham M, 2001, Now, discover your strengths

Buda R, 1991, The influence of indirect knowledge of prior performance on evaluations of present performance: The generalizability of assimilation effects, Journal of Psychology and the Behavioral Sciences, 6, 89

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb01811.x

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00283.x

10.1037/1061-4087.52.2.99

Cohen J, 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

Conway RL, 1999, The impact of coaching mid‐level managers utilizing multi‐rater feedback

10.1207/S15327043HUP1404_1

10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.390

Dominick PG, 2004, Individual differences and peer feedback: Personality's impact on behavior change

10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.379

10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256

Erickson A, 2003, Linking 360° feedback to business outcome measures

10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.215

10.1348/096317900167047

10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.530

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00141.x

10.1002/hrm.3930320210

10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.490

10.1037/h0037507

Helland KR, 2003, What does it all mean? Differences in multisource ratings

10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00159.x

Heslin PA, 2004, Implicit‐person theory effects on employee coaching

Heslin PA, The effect of implicit person theory on performance appraisals, Journal of Applied Psychology

*Hezlett SA, 1996, The effects of multi‐rater feedback on managers' skill development: Factors influencing behavior change

10.1037/10286-005

Higgins ET, 1999, The coherence of personality: Social‐cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization, 61

*Hilario FL, 1998, Effects of 360‐degree feedback on managerial effectiveness ratings: A longitudinal field study

Hunter JE, 1990, Methods of meta‐analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings

10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349

*Ivanitskaya LV, 1999, Cognitive and motivational influences on self‐other congruence in multisource feedback

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00162.x

*Johnson KM, 2001, The influence of self‐other agreement on performance improvement following feedback from multiple sources

10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

Leonard E, 2001, An empirical examination of accountability perceptions within a multi‐source feedback system

Locke EA, 1990, A theory of goal setting and task performance

London M, 1995, Can multi‐source feedback change self‐awareness and behavior? Theoretical applications and directions for research, Personnel Psychology, 48, 803, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01782.x

10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00043-2

10.1177/1059601197222003

10.1002/hrm.10083

10.1108/02621719910300784

10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.693

10.1177/009102609001900208

Meyer JP, 1997, Commitment in the workplace

10.1002/1099-1379(200009)21:6<609::AID-JOB42>3.0.CO;2-K

Morris SB, 2002, Combining effect size estimates in meta‐analysis with repeated measures and independent‐groups designs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 7, 105

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00251.x

10.2307/255745

10.1002/hrm.3930320206

Noe RA, 2005, Employee training and development

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02494.x

Peterson DB, 1993, Measuring change: A psychometric approach to evaluating individual coaching outcomes

10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.498

10.1177/009102609602500410

*Quadracci RH, 1995, The effects of 360 degree feedback, method of feedback and criticality of skill sets on changes in self‐perception

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01586.x

10.1177/01461672952111003

10.1108/02683949810369147

10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.322

RutkowskiKA SteelmanLA GriffithRL. (2004 April).Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology Chicago .

10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.199

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb02422.x

10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.50

10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.561

Smith EM, 2002, Self‐other rating agreement in multi‐source feedback: Antecedents and correlates

*Smither JW, 2002, Does discussing multisource feedback with raters enhance performance improvement?

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00142.x

10.1108/02621710410537065

Smither JW, Relationships between leaders' personality and reactions to, and use of, multisource feedback: A longitudinal study, Group and Organization Management

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01744.x

Smither JW, 1988, The effect of prior performance information on ratings of present performance: Contrast versus assimilation revisited, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 487, 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.487

Smither JW, 2001, Handbook of multisource feedback

10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.575

Steelman LA, 2001, The feedback environment and its potential role in 360‐degree feedback

Steelman LA, 2002, The feedback environment scale (FES): Construct definition, measurement and validation

10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01891.x

10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.629

10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00163.x

Vicere AA, 1998, Leadership by design: How benchmark companies sustain success through investment in continuous learning

10.1177/1059601101262004

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00166.x

10.1177/1059601100252003

10.1016/S1048-9843(98)90011-X

10.1207/s15327043hup1302_3

10.1002/hrm.3930320204