DELAY OR PROBABILITY DISCOUNTING IN A MODEL OF IMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR: EFFECT OF ALCOHOL

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior - Tập 71 Số 2 - Trang 121-143 - 1999
Jerry B. Richards1, Lan Zhang1, Suzanne H. Mitchell1, Harriet de Wit1
1The University of Chicago,

Tóm tắt

Little is known about the acute effects of drugs of abuse on impulsivity and self‐control. In this study, impulsivity was assessed in humans using a computer task that measured delay and probability discounting. Discounting describes how much the value of a reward (or punisher) is decreased when its occurrence is either delayed or uncertain. Twenty‐four healthy adult volunteers ingested a moderate dose of ethanol (0.5 or 0.8 g/kg ethanol; n = 12 at each dose) or placebo before completing the discounting task. In the task the participants were given a series of choices between a small, immediate, certain amount of money and $10 that was either delayed (0, 2, 30, 180, or 365 days) or probabilistic (i.e., certainty of receipt was 1.0, .9, .75, .5, or .25). The point at which each individual was indifferent between the smaller immediate or certain reward and the $10 delayed or probabilistic reward was identified using an adjusting‐amount procedure. The results indicated that (a) delay and probability discounting were well described by a hyperbolic function; (b) delay and probability discounting were positively correlated within subjects; (c) delay and probability discounting were moderately correlated with personality measures of impulsivity; and (d) alcohol had no effect on discounting.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1037/h0076860

Bradshaw C. M., 1992, Choice between delayed reinforcers in a discrete‐trials schedule: The effect of deprivation level, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 1

10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80142-4

Derogatis L., 1983, SCL‐90‐R manual—II

10.1007/BF02245577

10.1007/BF02245245

10.1016/S0376-8716(97)00094-X

10.1097/00008877-199408000-00007

10.1177/070674379504000507

10.1016/0277-9536(92)90254-N

Eysenck H. J., 1968, Eysenck personality inventory

10.2466/pr0.1978.43.3f.1247

10.1037/10500-009

10.3109/10826089509055838

10.1037/10627-000

10.1037/1064-1297.5.1.14

10.1037/h0081045

10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00610.x

Herrnstein R. J., 1981, Quantification of steady‐state operant behavior, 3

Hingson R., 1990, Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome transmission: Changes in knowledge and behaviors among teenagers, Massachusetts statewide survey, 1986 to 1988, Pediatrics, 85, 24, 10.1542/peds.85.1.24

10.2307/1914185

10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00311.x

10.1006/obhd.1995.1086

Lau M. A., 1995, Provocation, acute alcohol intoxication, cognitive performance, and aggression, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 150, 10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.150

Linnoila M., 1990, Violence and suicidality, 218

10.1017/S0140525X00053978

10.1002/cpt1971122part1245

Mazur J. E., 1987, Quantitative analysis of behavior: The effects of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value, 55

10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770907

10.2105/AJPH.80.9.1062

10.1037/h0024180

10.1901/jeab.1995.64-263

10.1177/073428298500300205

1995, Origin 4.1 [Computer software]

Rachlin H., 1989, Judgment, decision and choice: A cognitive and behavioral synthesis

10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00220.x

10.1901/jeab.1987.48-347

10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15

10.1037/0033-295X.93.1.33

10.1901/jeab.1991.55-233

10.1002/bdm.3960060202

10.1901/jeab.1997.67-353

10.1037/10788-000

10.2307/2967612

Steele C. M., 1985, Alcohol and social behavior I: The psychology of drunken excess, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 18, 10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.18

10.3109/07853899009147915

10.15288/jsa.1989.50.197

10.1037/11167-000

10.1037/h0030478

10.1037/10500-005