Culture, strategy and teamwork

1. “Rethinking work”,Business Week, 17 October 1994, pp. 74‐94.

2. Kaufman, R.S. “Why operations improvement programmes fail: four managerial contradictions”,Sloan Management Review, Fall, 1992, pp. 83‐93.

3. Been, M. and Eisenstat, R. “Why change programmes don′t produce change”,Harvard Business Review, November‐December 1990, Vol. 68 No. 6, pp. 158‐66.

12. Smith, L. “New ideas from the army”,Fortune, September, 1994, pp. 203‐12.

10.2307/41166683

14. Martin, R. “Changing the mind of the corporation”,Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69 No. 4, November‐December, 1991, pp. 81‐94.

10.5465/AME.1989.4277408

16. McGrath, M.E. and Hoole, R.W. “Manufacturing′s new economies of scale”,Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70 No. 3, May‐June 1992, pp. 94‐102.

17. Moore, J.F. “Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition”,Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71 No. 3, May‐June 1993, pp. 75‐86.

10.5465/AME.1991.4274663

19. Pearson, A.E. “Corporate redemption and the seven deadly sins”,Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70 No. 3, May‐June 1992, pp. 65‐75.

10.1016/0090-2616(92)90025-I

21. Schaffer, R.H. and Thompson, H. “Successful change programmes begin with results”,Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70 No. 1, January‐February 1992, pp. 80‐9.

22. Thurow, L.C. “Who owns the twenty‐first century?”,Sloan Management Review, Vol. 33No. 3, Spring, 1992, pp. 5‐17.

10.1002/hrm.3930320211

24. Maccoby, M. “Creating an empowered organization”,Research Technology Management, Vol. 35 No. 3, May‐June 1992, pp. 50‐1.