Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning

Cognitive Science - Tập 26 Số 5 - Trang 653-684 - 2002
Ara Norenzayan1, Edward E. Smith2, Beom Jun Kim3, Richard E. Nisbett2
1Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4
2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1003, USA
3Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

Tóm tắt

Abstract

The authors examined cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning among East Asian (Chinese and Korean), Asian American, and European American university students. We investigated categorization (Studies 1 and 2), conceptual structure (Study 3), and deductive reasoning (Studies 3 and 4). In each study a cognitive conflict was activated between formal and intuitive strategies of reasoning. European Americans, more than Chinese and Koreans, set aside intuition in favor of formal reasoning. Conversely, Chinese and Koreans relied on intuitive strategies more than European Americans. Asian Americans' reasoning was either identical to that of European Americans, or intermediate. Differences emerged against a background of similar reasoning tendencies across cultures in the absence of conflict between formal and intuitive strategies.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1207/s15516709cog1601_3

10.1037/0096-3445.120.1.3

Atran S., 1990, Cognitive foundations of natural history

10.1177/135910457000100301

Chaiken S., 1999, Dual‐process theories in social psychology

10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.890

10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.47

Davis M. Nisbett R. E. &Schwarz N.(2000).Responses to weak arguments by East Asians and Americans.Unpublished manuscript University of Michigan Ann Arbor .

Evans J. B. T., 1996, Rationality and reasoning.

10.3758/BF03196976

10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1495

10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288

Fung Y. L., 1952, A history of Chinese philosophy

10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00002-X

10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107

James W., 1890, The principles of psychology

10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.943

10.1017/CBO9780511752902.010

10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90442-0

10.1111/j.1540-6253.1974.tb00654.x

10.1017/CBO9780511607691

Lloyd G. E. R., 1996, Modes of thought: Explorations in culture and cognition, 15

10.1016/0010-0285(87)90012-0

Nagashima N., 1973, Modes of thought: Essays on thinking in Western and non‐Western societies, 92

Nakamura H., 1960, The ways of thinking of eastern peoples

Needham J., 1954, Science and civilization in China

10.1111/j.2044-8295.1963.tb00857.x

10.1016/0010-0277(92)90019-E

10.1002/0471214426.pas0213

10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291

Norenzayan A., 2001, Rule‐based and experience‐based thinking: The cognitive consequences of intellectual traditions, Dissertation Abstracts International, 62

10.1111/1467-8721.00077

Norenzayan A. &Sanchez‐Burks J.(2002).Normative evaluations of reasoning styles across cultures and contexts.Unpublished manuscript University of British Columbia.

10.1080/14640748508400919

Ohbuchi K. I., 1994, Cultural styles of conflict management in Japanese and Americans: Passivity, covertness, and effectiveness of strategies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 24, 1345

On L. W., 1996, The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological, and contextual influences, 25

10.1037/h0043424

10.3758/CABN.1.4.360

10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741

10.1037/0096-3445.122.1.92

10.1017/CBO9780511752902.020

10.3758/BF03213778

10.1017/CBO9780511529863.004

Rosch E., 1978, Cognition and categorization.

10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9

10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3

Russell B., 1945, A history of Western philosophy

10.1006/cogp.1993.1006

10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3

10.4159/harvard.9780674866270

10.1207/s15516709cog1601_1

10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00043-7

10.4324/9781410603432

Stich S. P., 1990, Fragmentation of reason.

10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293

10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.89

10.1177/002202217500600102

Wittgenstein L., 1953, Philosophical investigations