Cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has a better 10 year survival than posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tóm tắt
There has been a long standing debate regarding superiority of cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty over posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty regarding the short-term outcomes as well as long-term survivorship. The proponents of both the techniques have published vast evidence in favor of their respective surgical method and early outcome in meta-analyses does not seem to be significantly different. The decision to select either design should depend on their long-term survivorship but the literature comparing their long-term survival is sparse.This meta-analysis was conducted in order to answer the following questions: (1) Does cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has a better long-term survival beyond 10 years.compared to posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty? (2) Does cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty has higher complication rates compared to posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty? The present systematic review and meta-analysis study was carried out following PRISMA guidelines. The following databases: Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and CINAHL were used to search potentially interesting articles published from database inception until January 2022. Inclusion criteria for articles were: (1) retrospective comparative studies; (2) patients who had undergone a total knee arthroplasty; (3) publications evaluating the long-term survival of cruciate-retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilizing (PS) at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up; (4) publications evaluating complications of cruciate-retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilizing (PS) at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up; and (5) publications reporting sufficient data regarding the outcomes. We used a fixed-effects design in the case of I2 < 50% and P > 0.05; if not, we adopted a random-effects design [4]. We also performed subgroups and sensitivity analysis in order to assess the possible source of heterogeneity. Database searching identified 597 studies to be screened, of which 291 abstracts were revealed as potentially eligible and finally 7 articles were included. The forest plot showed that CR had significantly better survival than PS (OR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.69–2.80) after 10 years. However, complication rate was not significantly different between CR and PS groups (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.52–1.44; P = 0.57). Subgroup analysis showed that only the period of publication constituted a source of heterogeneity in survivorship outcome. Sensitivity analysis revealed that outcomes did not differ markedly, which indicates that the meta-analysis had strong reliability. The results of this meta-analysis showed that cruciate retaining prosthesis may be preferred over the posterior stabilized design in view of longer survivorship it offers However, further randomized controlled trials are recommended to confirm this finding.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Verra WC, van den Boom LG, Jacobs W, Clement DJ, Wymenga AA (2013) Nelissen RG Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013(10):CD004803
Kim GW, Jin QH, Lim JH et al (2021) No difference of survival between cruciate retaining and substitution designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty. Sci Rep 11:6537
Song SJ, Park CH, Bae DK (2019) What to know for selecting cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 11(2):142–150
Jiang C, Liu Z, Wang Y, Bian Y, Feng B, Weng X (2016) Posterior cruciate ligament retention versus posterior stabilization for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11(1):e0147865
Sumino T, Tomita T, Sugamoto K et al (2020) Semi-constrained posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty reproduces natural deep knee bending kinematics. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21:107
Wodowski AJ, Swigler CW, Liu H, Nord KM, Toy PC, Mihalko WM (2016) Proprioception and knee arthroplasty: a literature review. Orthop Clin North Am 47(2):301–309
D’Anchise R, Andreata M, Balbino C, Manta N (2013) Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: differences in surgical technique. Joints 1(1):5–9
Laskin RS, O'Flynn HM. The insall award. Total knee replacement with posterior cruciate ligament retention in rheumatoid arthritis. Problems and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997 (345):24–8
Carvalho LH, Temponi EF, Mchado Soares LF (2014) Relationship between range of motion and femoral rollback in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 48(1):1–5
Donadio J, Pelissier A, Boyer P, Massin P (2015) Control of paradoxical kinematics in posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty by increasing posterior femoral offset. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(6):1631–1637
Swanik CB, Lephart SM, Rubash HE (2004) Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(2):328–334
Nelissen RG, Hogendoorn PC (2001) Retain or sacrifice the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty? A histopathological study of the cruciate ligament in osteoarthritic and rheumatoid disease. J Clin Pathol 54(5):381–384
Argenson JN, Boisgard S, Parratte S, Descamps S, Bercovy M, Bonnevialle P, Briard JL, Brilhault J, Chouteau J, Nizard R, Saragaglia D, Servien E (2013) French Society of Orthopedic and Traumatologic Surgery (SOFCOT). Survival analysis of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up: a multicenter French nationwide study including 846 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(4):385–390
The 18th Annual report of the British National joint registry, 2021. British Orthopaedic Association, 2021
The New Zealand joint registry 2022 Annual report. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association 2022
Texte intégral. Accessed February 5, 2022. https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/355/bmj.i4919.full.pdf
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2010) A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Method 1(2):97–111
Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS (2003) Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg-Am 85(2):259–265
Bhandari M, Smith J, Miller LE, Block JE (2012) Clinical and economic burden of revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 5:89–94
Roman MD, Russu O, Mohor C et al (2022) Outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty (Review). Exp Ther Med 23(1):29
Sartawi M, Zurakowski D, Rosenberg A. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 15-year follow-up. Am J Orthop 2018;47(3)
Serna-Berna R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Vizcaya-Moreno MF, Miralles Muñoz FA, Gonzalez-Navarro B, Lopez-Prats FA (2018) Cruciate-retaining vs posterior-stabilized primary total arthroplasty. Clinical outcome comparison with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. J Arthroplasty 33(8):2491–2495
Abdel MP, Morrey ME, Jensen MR, Morrey BF (2011) Increased long-term survival of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior cruciate-stabilizing total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 93(22):2072–2078
Mayne A, Harshavardhan H, Johnston L, Wang W, Jariwala A (2017) Cruciate retaining compared with posterior stabilised Nexgen total knee arthroplasty: results at 10 years in a matched cohort. Annals 99(8):602–606
Crowninshield RD, Muratoglu OK (2008) Implant wear symposium 2007 engineering work group How have new sterilization techniques and new forms of polyethylene influenced wear in total joint replacement? J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16(Suppl1):S80–85
HodrickJeffrey T et al (2008) Highly crosslinked polyethylene is safe for use in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Related Res 466(11):2806–12
Spekenbrink-Spooren A, Van Steenbergen LN, Denissen G, Swierstra BA, Poolman RW, Nelissen R (2018) Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016. Acta Orthop 89(6):640–645
Vertullo CJ, Lewis PL, Lorimer M, Graves SE (2017) The effect on long-term survivorship of surgeon preference for posterior-stabilized or minimally stabilized total knee replacement: an analysis of 63,416 prostheses from the Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(13):1129–1139
Longo UG, Ciuffreda M, Mannering N, D’Andrea V, Locher J, Salvatore G, Denaro V (2018) Outcomes of posterior-stabilized compared with cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 31(4):321–340
Castagnini F, Sudanese A, Bordini B, Tassinari E, Stea S, Toni A (2017) Total knee replacement in young patients: survival and causes of revision in a registry population. J Arthroplasty 32(11):3368–3372
Klug A, Gramlich Y, Rudert M et al (2021) The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future health care systems over the next 30 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29:3287–3298
Mody BS, Mody K (2014) Arthroplasty in young adults: options, techniques, trends, and results Curr. Rev Musculoskelet Med 7(2):131–135