Cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve case finding for tuberculosis: developing consensus to motivate investment
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ho J, Fox GJ, Marais BJ. Passive case finding for tuberculosis is not enough. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2016;5(4):374–8.
World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2022. Geneva: WHO; 2022.
Biermann O, Lönnroth K, Caws M, Viney K. Factors influencing active tuberculosis case-finding policy development and implementation: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12):e031284.
Azman AS, Golub JE, Dowdy DW. How much is tuberculosis screening worth? Estimating the value of active case finding for tuberculosis in South Africa, China, and India. BMC Med. 2014;12:1–9.
Gomes I, Dong C, Vandewalle P, Khan A, Creswell J, Dowdy D, Sohn H. Comparative assessment of the cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis (TB) active case-finding interventions: a systematic analysis of TB REACH wave 5 projects. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0270816.
Quang Vo L, Forse RJ, Tran J, et al. Economic evaluation of a community health worker model for tuberculosis care in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam: a mixed-methods social return on investment analysis. BMC Pub Health. 2023;23:945.
Ryckman TS, Dowdy DW, Kendall EA. Infectious and clinical tuberculosis trajectories: Bayesian modeling with case finding implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(52):e2211045119.
Muniyandi M, Thomas BE, Karikalan N, et al. Catastrophic costs due to tuberculosis in South India: comparison between active and passive case finding. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2020;114(3):185–92.
Ochalek J, Lomas J, Claxton K. Estimating health opportunity costs in low-income and middle-income countries: a novel approach and evidence from cross-country data. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(6):e000964.