Cost‐effective alternatives for mitigating <i>Cryptosporidium</i> risk in drinking water and enhancing ecosystem services

Water Resources Research - Tập 45 Số 8 - 2009
Brett A. Bryan1, John Kandulu1
1CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Urrbrae, South Australia, Australia

Tóm tắt

Under the multibarrier paradigm, water quality management barriers that mitigate risk to consumers are required at multiple points from the catchment to the tap. We present a cost‐effectiveness analysis of 13 catchment‐ and treatment‐based management alternatives for mitigating Cryptosporidium risk in the Myponga water supply catchment, South Australia. A broad range of costs and benefits are identified and valued, including setup, operation and maintenance, and opportunity costs, and benefits for ecosystem services including water quality, biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and farm production services. The results suggest that the cost‐effectiveness of investment in water quality management can be substantially enhanced by considering the costs of management and the benefits for ecosystem services, in addition to Cryptosporidium removal effectiveness. Cost‐effectiveness of investment in management alternatives is dependent upon the desired level of Cryptosporidium removal effectiveness by both the catchment and treatment barriers. The combination of a spatially targeted 25% restriction in water course access of nondairy cattle and treatment by enhanced coagulation provides the most (net) cost‐effective Cryptosporidium risk mitigation strategy. This combination may achieve 0.614 log removal at a net cost of A$0.7 million and (net) cost‐effectiveness of A$1.14 million per log removal. Additional risk mitigation can be achieved through the addition of ultraviolet irradiation treatment, higher levels of water course access restriction for cattle, and the adoption of dung beetles in the catchment. Economic valuation of a range of costs and benefits of management priorities can support cost‐effective water quality management investment decisions and inform elements of policy design such as cost‐sharing arrangements and spatial targeting.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00049.x

10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.09.002

10.1007/s00267-006-0184-z

10.2136/sssaj2004.1670

10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.006

Bryan B. A. andS.Marvanek(2004) Quantifying and valuing land use change for Integrated Catchment Management evaluation in the Murray‐Darling Basin 1996/97–2000/01. Stage 2 Report to the Murray‐Darling Basin Commission p. 151 CSIRO Land and Water.

10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.014

10.2134/jeq2004.0335

10.1038/35481

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.020

10.3201/eid0904.020417

10.1038/387253a0

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.003

Daily G. E., 1997, Nature's Services—Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems

Deere D., 2001, Water Quality: Guidelines, Standards and Health

10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb04329.x

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2002.10.001

Emerton L., 2007, Economic assessment of ecosystems as components of water infrastructure, Water J. Aust. Water Resour. Assoc., 34, 36

10.2305/IUCN.CH.2004.WANI.3.en

EPA(2008) Myponga Watercourse Restoration Project Final Report 2000–07 South Australian Environment Protection Authority Adelaide South Australia.

Ferguson C. M., 2007, Development of a process‐based model to predict pathogen budgets for the Sydney drinking water catchment, J. Water Health, 2, 187, 10.2166/wh.2007.013b

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.005

10.1016/j.agsy.2007.05.004

10.1079/9781845932237.0171

10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.048

Haas C. N., 1999, Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment

10.1007/s00267-007-9060-8

10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.006

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.033

Hrudey S. E., 2004, Safe Drinking Water—Lessons from Recent Outbreaks in Affluent Nations

10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.004

10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.021

10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00026-1

10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00131-7

10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.002

10.1056/NEJM199407213310304

10.1007/s00267-007-9001-6

10.2307/3285742

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well‐being: Synthesis

10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.016

10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00380-7

NHMRC, 2004, Australian Drinking Water Guidelines

10.1126/science.1100103

10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.rec0260.x

10.1080/089419299279452

10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.022

Reid W. V., 2001, Managing Human‐Dominated Ecosystems, Monographs in Systematic Botany, 197

10.1080/089207599263785

10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00058-4

10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00273-1

10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00586-2

Schoenborn C. andM.Duncan(2001) Growth and nutrient uptake by effluent‐irrigated eucalypts Agriculture Notes AG09051–3 Dept. of Nat. Resour. and Environ. November 2001.

10.2495/SI060361

10.1016/j.ecss.2007.01.019

10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00090-1

10.2166/wh.2007.140

10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00982.x

Stavins R. N., 2005, The Cost of US Forest‐Based Carbon Sequestration

10.1007/s00267-007-9012-3

10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.03.002

10.1111/j.1744-7976.1997.tb00205.x

10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb04323.x

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.008

10.1504/IJW.2004.005528

Zeckoski R. B.Benham andC.Lunsford(2007) Streamside Livestock Exclusion: A Tool for Increasing Farm Income and Improving Water Quality Virginia Cooperative Extension. (Available athttp://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/bse/442-766/442-766.html).

10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0065:WAYSRI]2.0.CO;2

10.1080/13504500809469770