Coronary Artery Bypass in Young Patients—On or Off-Pump?

Journal of Clinical Medicine - Tập 8 Số 2 - Trang 128
Ryoi Okano1,2, Yi-Jia Liou3, Hsi‐Yu Yu2, I‐Hui Wu2, Nai‐Kuan Chou2, Yih‐Sharng Chen2, Nai‐Hsin Chi2
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama 362-8588, Japan
2Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
3Department of Life Science, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 97401, Taiwan

Tóm tắt

A definitive conclusion regarding whether on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass is preferable in young patients is lacking. The aim of our study was to perform a long-term comparison of the two approaches in young patients. We analyzed the National Health Insurance Research Database, using data for patients between 18 and 45 years of age who had undergone isolated coronary artery bypass between 2001 and 2011. The study endpoints were: all-cause death, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and repeat revascularization within 30 days, 1 year, 5 years, and the entire 10-year follow-up period. A total of 344 patients received off-pump surgery and 741 patients received on-pump surgery. Preoperative characteristics and comorbidities were similar in both groups, and all-cause mortality was almost equal (p = 0.716). The 5-year survival rates were 93.9% and 92.2% in the off-pump and on-pump groups, respectively, and the 10-year survival rates were 86.3% and 82.1%, respectively. The repeat revascularization rate was significantly lower in the on-pump group (p = 0.0407). Both the on-pump and off-pump methods offer equally good long-term outcomes in terms of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. However, the need for repeat revascularization is a concern in the long term after off-pump surgery.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Benetti, 1991, Direct Myocardial Revascularization without Extracorporeal Circulation: Experience in 700 Patients, Chest, 100, 312, 10.1378/chest.100.2.312

Lamy, 2013, Effects of Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting at 1 Year, N. Engl. J. Med., 368, 1179, 10.1056/NEJMoa1301228

Lamy, 2016, Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting, N. Engl. J. Med., 375, 2359, 10.1056/NEJMoa1601564

Shroyer, 2017, Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass, N. Engl. J. Med., 377, 623, 10.1056/NEJMoa1614341

Diegeler, 2013, Off-Pump versus On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients, N. Engl. J. Med., 368, 1189, 10.1056/NEJMoa1211666

Houlind, 2012, On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in elderly patients: results from the Danish on-pump versus off-pump randomization study, Circulation, 125, 2431, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.052571

Windecker, 2014, 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Eur. Heart J., 35, 2541, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278

Alkhawam, 2015, Coronary Artery Disease in Young Adults, Am. J. Med. Sci., 350, 479, 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000579

Rubin, 2012, Coronary Heart Disease in Young Adults, Curr. Atheroscler. Rep., 14, 140, 10.1007/s11883-012-0226-3

Saraiva, 2017, Coronary artery bypass surgery in young adults: excellent perioperative results and long-term survival. Interact, Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg., 24, 691

Furukawa, 2009, Abstract: P1356 CORONARY RISK FACTOR PROFILE AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR YOUNG JAPANESE PATIENTS UNDERGOING CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION, Atheroscler. Suppl., 10, e325, 10.1016/S1567-5688(09)70324-1

Trzeciak, 2017, In-hospital and long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients ≤ 45 years of age and older (from the KROK registry), Kardiol. Pol., 75, 884, 10.5603/KP.a2017.0090

Tini, 2017, Long-Term Outcome of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Young Patients, High Blood Press. Cardiovasc. Prev., 24, 77, 10.1007/s40292-017-0183-6

Fleissner, 2015, Coronary artery bypass grafting in young patients—insights into a distinct entity, J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 10, 65, 10.1186/s13019-015-0266-1

Niederhauser, 1998, Late outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting in young versus older patients, Ann. Thorac. Surg., 65, 377, 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)01082-5

Cole, 2003, Long-term follow-up of coronary artery disease presenting in young adults, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 41, 521, 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02862-0

Choudhury, 1999, Myocardial infarction in young patients, Am. J. Med., 107, 254, 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00218-1

(2013, December 12). National Health Insurance Annual Report 2014–2015. Ministry of Health and Welfare: Taiwan, R.O.C., 2014. Available online: https://goo.gl/xrKWwj.

Chen, 2017, On pump versus off pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease and coronary artery disease—A nation-wide, propensity score matched database analyses, Int. J. Cardiol., 227, 529, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.108

Puskas, 2010, On-pump versus off-pump CABG, N. Engl. J. Med., 362, 851, 10.1056/NEJMc0912190

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Tập 8 Số 2

128

Thông tin tác giả