Copy number variants in genetic susceptibility and severity of systemic lupus erythematosus

Cytogenetic and Genome Research - Tập 123 Số 1-4 - Trang 142-147 - 2008
Travis Ptacek1, X. Li2, James Kelley2, Jeffrey C. Edberg2
1Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
2University of Alabama at Birmingham

Tóm tắt

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of auto-antibodies to nuclear antigens, immune complex deposition, and subsequent tissue destruction. Early studies in twins suggested that SLE has, at least in part, a genetic basis, and a role for class II alleles in the major histocompatibility complex has been known for over 30 years. Through both linkage studies and candidate gene studies, numerous additional genetic risk factors have been identified. The recent publication of two SNP-based genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has resulted in the confirmation of a number of previously identified genetic risk loci and has identified new previously unappreciated loci conferring risk for development of SLE. A role for gene copy number variation (CNV) in SLE has also been appreciated through studies of the complement component 4 (C4) loci and more recent work in the IgG Fc receptor loci. The availability of large SNP-based GWAS datasets will undoubtedly lead to the genome-wide analysis and identification of copy number variants related to genetic susceptibility for development of SLE. We review current studies of CNV in SLE susceptibility that include reports of association between SLE and CNV in <i>C4</i>, IgG Fc receptors, <i>TLR7,</i> and <i>CCL3L1</i>.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038%2Fnm1741

10.1038%2Fnature04489

10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0030396

10.1038%2Fnrg2149

10.1016%2FS1474-4422%2808%2970048-6

10.1182%2Fblood-2007-03-079913

10.1080%2F08916930701763710

10.1111%2Fj.1423-0410.2007.01031.x

10.1172%2FJCI114706

10.1038%2Fncprheum0191

10.1016%2FS1074-7613%2801%2900150-9

10.1097%2F01.bor.0000169360.15701.27

10.1093%2Fhmg%2Fddn233

10.1038%2Fni1521

10.1038%2F447161a

10.1038%2Fng2046

10.1086%2F505915

10.1126%2Fscience.1101160

10.1038%2Fnrg1944

10.1038%2Fng.81

10.1002%2Fart.1780400928

10.1056%2FNEJMoa0707865

10.1002%2Feji.1830220327

10.1111%2Fj.1600-065X.1995.tb00068.x

10.1002%2Fart.22916

10.1101%2Fgr.229102.+Article+published+online+before+print+in+May+2002

10.1034%2Fj.1399-0039.2000.560205.x

10.1177%2F0961203306072311

10.1136%2Fard.2007.078048

10.1016%2Fj.ajhg.2007.12.009

10.1007%2Fs10048-008-0119-3

10.1136%2Fard.2007.075028

10.1002%2Fart.1780221105

10.1007%2Fs10875-007-9088-9

10.1016%2FS0065-2776%2807%2996005-8

10.1016%2Fj.immuni.2006.11.010

10.1126%2Fscience.1124978

10.1126%2Fscience.291.5503.484

10.1080%2F08916930500285394

10.1002%2Fart.1780200812

10.1046%2Fj.1537-2995.1989.29189101164.x

10.1038%2Fnm1416

10.1038%2Fnature07229

10.1053%2Ftmrv.2002.29406

10.1146%2Fannurev.immunol.21.120601.141126

10.1016%2Fj.immuni.2007.12.007

10.1056%2FNEJM200104053441406

10.1056%2FNEJM200104123441506

10.1186%2Far586

10.1086%2F518257

10.1074%2Fjbc.274.17.12147