Contradictory Christology: a conciliar concern
Tóm tắt
The purpose of this article is to express what I call a “conciliar concern” regarding Jc Beall’s recently proposed contradictory Christology. By “conciliar concern” I mean a concern that is likely to be shared by all Christians—be they Catholic, Orthodox, or Protestant—who are committed to the early ecumenical councils. Formulated as an argument, the concern is this: if contradictory Christology is correct, then the early ecumenical councils were misguided. But (conciliar Christians should say that) the early ecumenical councils were not misguided. Therefore, (conciliar Christians should say that) contradictory Christology is not correct.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adamson, P. (2022). Don’t Think for Yourself: Authority and Belief in Medieval Philosophy. Notre Dame University Press.
Beall, Jc. (2013a). Shrieking against gluts: The solution to the ‘just true’ problem. Analysis, 73, 438–445.
Beall, Jc. (2013b). A simple approach towards recapturing consistent theories in paraconsistent settings. Review of Symbolic Logic, 6, 755–764.
Beall, Jc. (2021). The Contradictory Christ. Oxford University Press.
Beall, Jc., Pawl, T., McCall, T., Cotnoir, A. J., & Uckelman, S. (2019). The Complete Symposium on Jc Beall’s Christ – A Contradiction: A Defense of Contradictory Christology. Journal of Analytic Theology, 7, 400–577.
Tanner, Norman P. (1990). Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils (2 volume set). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.