Contradictions in portfolio careers: work design and client relations

Emerald - Tập 11 Số 1 - Trang 65-79 - 2006
Tara J.Fenwick1
1University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe paper aims to explore “Portfolio work”, an emerging form of flexible self‐employment, which has been identified as significant but under‐researched. This paper also seeks to explore the challenges and benefits of portfolio work from the perspective of individuals' experiences.Design/methodology/approachThe argument draws from a qualitative study involving 31 individuals practising portfolio work in two different occupational groups: nurses and adult educators. Participants were interviewed in semi‐structured in‐depth conversational interviews to explore their everyday experience and work history in portfolio work.FindingsTwo dimensions of portfolio work, work design and client‐relations, are found to generate experiences of both deep satisfaction and deep anxiety and stress. The paper argues that portfolio careers simultaneously embed both liberating and exploitative at dimensions for workers, which are at least partly related to their own conflicting desires for both contingency and stability. Further, portfolio work embeds labour that often remains unrecognized, even by the self‐employed individuals assuming responsibility for it.Practical implicationsPortfolio workers need to recognise and document their unpaid but necessary labour in work design and client relations that sustains their careers; portfolio workers may need to educate clients about the nature of portfolio work; and employers who contract to portfolio workers must take more responsibility for negotiating fair contracts that are sensitive to overwork and unfair time pressures, and that anticipate and compensate contractors.Originality/valueThese findings challenge existing conceptions of portfolio work aseitherexploitativeorliberating, and expose contradictions embedded in both the conditions of the work and individuals' expectations and attitudes towards it.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arthur, M.B. and Rousseau, D.M. (2000), “The boundaryless career as a new employment principle”, in Arthur, M.B. and Rousseau, D.M. (Eds), The Boundaryless Career, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

Arthur, M.B., Inkson, K. and Pringle, J.K. (1999), Individual Action and Economic Change, Sage, London.

Beckstead, D. and Gellatly, G. (2003), The Canadian Economy in Transition: The Growth and Development of New Economy Industries, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, May.

Bird, A. (1996), “Careers as repositories of knowledge: considerations for boundaryless careers”, in Arthur, M.B. and Rousseau, D.M. (Eds), The Boundaryless Career, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

Cohen, L. and Mallon, M. (1999), “The transition from organisational employment to portfolio working: perceptions of boundarylessness”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 329‐52.

Comfort, M. (1997), Portfolio People: How to Create a Workstyle as Individual as You Are, Random House, London.

Denzin, N. (2000), “The practices and politics of interpretation”, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 897‐922.

du Gay, P. (1996), Consumption and Identity at Work, Sage, London.

Ely, M., Anzul, M., Friedmen, T., Garner, D. and Steinmetz, A.M. (1991), Doing Qualitative Research: Circles within Circles, Falmer, London.

Fenwick, T. (2003), “Flexible and individualisation in adult education work: the case of portfolio educators”, Journal of Education and Work, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 165‐84.

Fenwick, T. (2004), “Learning in portfolio work: anchored innovation and mobile identities”, Studies in Continuing Education, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 229‐41.

Garrick, J. and Usher, R. (2000), “Flexible learning, contemporary work and enterprising selves”, Electronic Journal of Sociology, Vol. 5 No. 1, available at: www. sociology. org/content/vol005.001/garrick‐usher.html (accessed July 20, 2001).

Gee, P., Hull, G. and Lankshear, C. (1996), The New Work Order: Behind the Language of the New Capitalism, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

Gold, M. and Fraser, J. (2002), “Managing self‐management: successful transitions to portfolio careers”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 579‐98.

Hall, D.T. and Mirvis, P.J. (1996), “The new protean career: psychological success and the path with a heart”, in Hall, D.T. (Ed.), The Career Is Dead, Long Live the Career: A Relational Approach to Careers, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (2000), “Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences”, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA and London.

Lowe, G.S. and Schellenberg, G. (2001), “What's a good job? The importance of employment relationships”, Canadian Policy Research Network Study, No. W/05, Renouf Pub., Ottawa.

Mallon, M. (1998), “The portfolio career: pushed or pulled to it?”, Personnel Review, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 361‐77.

Miles, M. and Huberman, A.M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Mirchandani, K. (2000), “‘The best of both worlds’ and ‘cutting my own throat:’ contradictory images of home‐based work”, Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 159‐82.

Smeaton, D. (2003), “Self‐employed workers: calling the shots or hesitant independents? A consideration of the trends”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 379‐91.

Sullivan, S.E. (1999), “The changing nature of careers: a review and research agenda”, Journal of Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 457‐84.

Fenwick, T. (2003), “Flexibility and individualisation in adult education work: the case of portfolio educators”, Journal of Education and Work, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 165‐84.

Fenwick, T. (2004), “Learning in portfolio work: anchored innovation and mobile identities”, Studies in Continuing Education, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 229‐41.

Hochschild, A.R. (1979), “Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structures,”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 85, pp. 551‐75.

Hughes, K. (1999), Gender and Self Employment in Canada: Assessing Trends and Policy Implications, Canadian Policy Research Network, Renouf Pub., Ottawa.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development) (2002), “Definition and selection of competences (DeSeCo): theoretical and conceptual foundations”, strategy paper, Paris.

Rose, N. (1998), Inventing Ourselves, Polity Press, Cambridge.

TOFFE (Toronto Organizing for Fair Employment) (2001), Breaking the Myth of Flexible Work: Contingent Work in Toronto, TOFFE, Toronto.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 11 Số 1

65-79

Thông tin tác giả