Ô nhiễm do Sử dụng Trước đó: Các Chiến lược Thiết kế và Tiếp thị Sản phẩm Chăm sóc Cá nhân Đã Tân Trang

Eurostat (2021) Greenhouse gas emission statistics - carbon footprints. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Greenhouse_gas_emission_statistics_-_carbon_footprints. Accessed 22 July 2022 Bocken NMP, de Pauw I, Bakker C, van der Grinten B (2016) Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J Ind Prod Eng 33:308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 Bocken N, Miller K, Evans S (2016) Assessing the environmental impact of new circular business models. Conference proceedings of New Business Models—Exploring a changing view on organizing value creation—Toulouse, France, pp 16–17 Pigosso DCA, Zanette ET, Filho AG et al (2010) Ecodesign methods focused on remanufacturing. J Clean Prod 18:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.005 Zumegen A (2020) Environmental Impacts of a local circular economy business model. Jyväskylä University, A carbon and Water footprint analysis for smartphone refurbishment Blomsma F, Tennant M (2020) Circular economy: preserving materials or products? Introducing the Resource States framework. Resour Conserv Recycl 156:104698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104698 Van Weelden E, Mugge R, Bakker C (2016) Paving the way towards circular consumption: exploring consumer acceptance of refurbished mobile phones in the Dutch market. J Clean Prod 113:743–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.065 Baxter WL, Aurisicchio M, Mugge R, Childs PR (2017) Positive and negative contamination in user interactions. In proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17). Vol. 8: Human Beaviour in Design, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25 August 2017 Abbey JD, Meloy MG, Blackburn J, Guide VDR (2015) Consumer markets for remanufactured and refurbished products. Calif Manage Rev 57:26–42. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.4.26 Mahmoodi H, Heydari J (2021) Consumers’ preferences in purchasing recycled/refurbished products: an empirical investigation. Int J Serv Oper Manag 38:594–609. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2021.114249 Mugge R, Safari I, Balkenende R (2017) Is there a market for refurbished toothbrushes? An exploratory study on consumers’ acceptance of refurbishment for different product categories. In proceedings of Product Lifetimes and the Environment conference (PLATE2017). Delft, the Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-820-4-293 Wallner TS, Magnier L, Mugge R (2021) Choosing new or refurbished ? The influence of the product’s durability and attractiveness, contamination risk and consumers’ environmental concern on purchase intentions of refurbished and new products. In proceedings of Product Lifetimes and Environment conference (PLATE2021). Limerick, Ireland. http://hdl.handle.net/10344/10172 Wallner ., Magnier L, Mugge R (2022) Do consumers mind contamination by previous users? A choice-based conjoint analysis to explore strategies that improve consumers’ choice for refurbished products. Resour Conserv Recycl 177:105998 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105998 Mugge R, de Jong W, Person O, Hultink EJ (2018) ‘If it ain’t broke, don’t explain it’: the influence of visual and verbal information about prior use on consumers’ evaluations of refurbished electronics. Des J 21:499–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1472856 Mugge R, Jockin B, Bocken N (2017) How to sell refurbished smartphones? An investigation of different customer groups and appropriate incentives. J Clean Prod 147:284–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.111 Nasiri MS (2021) Actual consumers ’ response to purchase refurbished smartphones : exploring perceived value from product reviews in online retailing. J Retail Consum Serv 62:102652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102652 Sharifi Z, Shokouhyar S (2021) Promoting consumer’s attitude toward refurbished mobile phones: a social media analytics approach. Resour Conserv Recycl 167:105398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105398 Wahjudi D, Gan S, Tanoto YY, Winata J (2020) Drivers and barriers of consumer purchase intention of remanufactured mobile phones: a study on Indonesian consumers. Dissertation, Petra Christian University Surabaya Meng MD, Leary RB (2021) It might be ethical, but I won’t buy it: perceived contamination of, and disgust towards, clothing made from recycled plastic bottles. Psychol Mark 38:298–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21323 Clube RKM, Tennant M (2020) Exploring garment rental as a sustainable business model in the fashion industry: does contamination impact the consumption experience? J Consum Behav 19:359–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1817 Rozin P, Haddad B, Nemerof C, Slovic P (2015) Psychological aspects of the rejection of recycled water: contamination, purification and disgust. Judgm Decis Mak 10:50–63 Hazée S, Van Vaerenbergh Y, Delcourt C, Warlop L (2019) Sharing goods? Yuck, no! An investigation of consumers’ contamination concerns about access-based services. J Serv Res 22:256–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670519838622 Baxter WL (2017) Designing circular possessions: exploring human-object relationships in the circular economy. Dissertation, Dyson School of Design Engineering Armstrong CM, Niinimäki K, Kujala S et al (2015) Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland. J Clean Prod 97:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.046 Tunn V, Bocken N, Schoormans JPL (2021) Consumer adoption of access-based product-service systems : the influence of duration of use and type of product. Bus Strategy Environ 30:2796–2813. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2894 Magnier L, Gil-Pérez I (2021) Reviving the milk man: consumers’ evaluations of circular reusable packaging offers. In proceedings of Product Lifetimes and Environment conference (PLATE2021). Limerick, Ireland, pp 26–28. http://hdl.handle.net/10344/10227 Miao X, Magnier L, Mugge R (2021) Developing reusable packaging for FMCG: consumers’ perceptions of benefits and risks of refillable and returnable packaging systems. In proceedings of Going Green-EcoDesign with Art, Science and Technology International Symposium (EcoDesign2021). Online conference, 1-3 December 2021 https://www.ecodenet.com/ed2021/index.html Chen Y, Wang J, Jia X (2020) Refurbished or remanufactured?—an experimental study on consumer choice behavior. Front Psychol 11:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00781 Harms R, Linton JD (2016) Willingness to pay for eco-certified refurbished products: the effects of environmental attitudes and knowledge: WTP for Eco-certified Refurbished Products. J Ind Ecol 20:893–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12301 Michaud C, Llerena D (2010) Green consumer behaviour: an experimental analysis of willingness to pay for remanufactured products. Bus Strategy Environ n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.703 Esmaeilian B, Onnipalayam Saminathan P, Cade W, Behdad S (2021) Marketing strategies for refurbished products: survey-based insights for probabilistic selling and technology level. Resour Conserv Recycl 167:105401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105401 Agostini L, Bigliardi B, Filippelli S, Galati F (2021) Seller reputation, distribution and intention to purchase refurbished products ☆. J Clean Prod 316:128296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128296 Gaur J, Mani V, Banerjee P et al (2019) Towards building circular economy: a cross-cultural study of consumers’ purchase intentions for reconstructed products. Manag Decis 57:886–903. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2018-0728 Hazen BT, Wu Y, Cegielski CG et al (2012) Consumer reactions to the adoption of green reverse logistics. Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res 22:417–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2012.690777 Singhal D, Jena SK, Tripathy S (2019) Factors influencing the purchase intention of consumers towards remanufactured products: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prod Res 57:7289–7299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1598590 Boyer RHW, Hunka AD, Linder M et al (2021) Product labels for the circular economy: are customers willing to pay for circular? Sustain Prod Consum 27:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.010 Govindan K, Jiménez-Parra B, Rubio S, Vicente-Molina M-A (2019) Marketing issues for remanufactured products. J Clean Prod 227:890–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.305 Baxter WL, Aurisicchio M, Childs PRN (2015) Materials, use and contaminated interaction. Mater Des 90:1218–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.04.019 Ackerman DS, Hu J (2017) Assuring me that it is as ‘Good as New’ just makes me think about how someone else used it. Examining consumer reaction toward marketer-provided information about secondhand goods. J Consum Behav 16:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1631 Creusen MEH, Schoormans JPL (2005) The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice*. J Prod Innov Manag 22:63–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00103.x Crilly N, Moultrie J, Clarkson PJ (2004) Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Des Stud 25:547–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001 Bridgens B, Lilley D, Smalley G, Balasundaram K (2015) Ageing gracefully to increase product longevity. In proceedings of Product Lifetime and Environment conference (PLATE2015). Nottingham, UK, pp 17–19 Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Cal Sage Publ, Thousand Oaks, p 4 Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many interviews are enough? Field Methods 18:24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 Hagaman A, Wutich A (2017) How many interviews are enough to identify metathemes in multisited and cross-cultural research? Another Perspective on Guest, Bunce, and Johnson’s (2006) Landmark Study. Field Methods 19https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16640447 Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C et al (2010) What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health 25:1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015 Desmet P, Hekkert P (2007) Framework of product experience. 10 Philips (2021) Philips Lumea Prestige. Philips website https://www.philips.com/c-e/ifa/products/lumea-prestige-look-better.html. Accessed 22 November 2021 van Overveld M, de Jong PJ, Peters ML (2010) The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale - Revised: its predictive value for avoidance behavior. Personal Individ Differ 49:706–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.008 Atasu A, Guide VDR, Van Wassenhove LN (2010) So what if remanufacturing cannibalizes my new product sales? Calif Manage Rev 52:56–76. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2010.52.2.56 Toohey KS, Sottos NR, Lewis JA et al (2007) Self-healing materials with microvascular networks. Nat Mater 6:581–585. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1934 Wool RP (2008) Self-healing materials: a review. Soft Matter 4:400–418. https://doi.org/10.1039/b711716g van den Berge R, Magnier L, Mugge R (2021) A poorly educated guess: consumers’ lifetime estimations, attitudes towards repairability,and a product lifetime label. In proceedings of Product Lifetimes and Environment conference (PLATE2021). Limerick, Ireland, pp 26–28. https://ulir.ul.ie/handle/10344/10181 Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Ackerman PL (2000) A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 83:33–60. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2896