Contact conditions at the chip-tool interface in machining

Jihong Hwang1, Srinivasan Chandrasekar2
1Dept. of Product Design & Manufacturing Engineering, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, Seoul, Korea
2School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA

Tóm tắt

Direct observation of the chip-tool interface was made using transparent sapphire tools in combination with a CCD-based high-speed imagining system. The observations made for various nonferrous workpiece materials suggest that the contact conditions at the chip-tool interface be classified into three types depending on the nature of the zone of stagnant material — negligible zone of stagnant material (Type 1), zone of stagnant material that is stable and confined to the vicinity of the cutting edge (Type 2), and zone of stagnant material that expands upward from the cutting edge as cutting progresses (Type 3). Velocity profiles obtained using the particle image velocimetry (PIV) show that retardation of the chip underside occurs in the intimate contact region for the Type 2 materials while it is negligible for the Type 1 materials. Nanoindentation hardness profiles measured with depth into the chip from the chip underside indicate that the expansion of the zone of stagnant material observed for the Type 3 materials could be related to the work-hardenability of the chip material in the secondary deformation zone.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Shaw, M. C., “Metal Cutting Principles,” Oxford University Press, pp. 202–223, 1984. Wright, P. K. and Trent, E. M., “Metal Cutting,” Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 29–40, 2000. Nakayama, K., “Temperature Rise of Workpiece During Metal Cutting,” Bulletin of the Faculty of Engineering, Yokohama National University, Vol. 5, pp. 1–10, 1956. Dogra, M., Sharma, V. S., Sachdeva, A., Suri, N. M. and Dureja, J. S., “Tool Wear, Chip Formation and Workpiece Surface Issues in CBN Hard Turning: A Review,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 341–358, 2010. Finnie, I. and Shaw, M. C., “The Friction Process in Metal Cutting,” Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 78, pp. 1649–1657, 1956. Zorev, N. N., “Interrelationship between Shear Processes Occurring along Tool Face and on Shear Plane in Metal Cutting,” Proc. of the International Production Engineering Research Council, pp. 42–49, 1963. Williams, J. A. and Tabor, D., “The Role of Lubricants in Machining,” Wear, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 275–292, 1977. Kattwinkel, W., “Experimentation of cutting action by means of photoelasticity,” Industrie-Anzeiger, Vol. 36, pp. 525–532, 1957. Usui, E. and Takeyama, H., “A Photoelastic Analysis of Machining Stresses,” Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 82, pp. 303–308, 1960. Chandrasekaran, H. and Kapoor, D. V., “Photoelastic Analysis of Tool-Chip Interface Stresses,” Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 87, No. 11, pp. 495–502, 1965. Bagchi, A. and Wright, P. K., “Stress Analysis in Machining with the Use of Sapphire Tools,” Proc. of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 409, pp. 99–113, 1987. Wallace, P. W. and Boothroyd, G., “Tool Forces and Tool Chip Friction in Orthogonal Machining,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, Vol. 6, pp. 74–87, 1964. Trent, E. M., “Conditions of Seizure at the Chip-Tool Interface,” Machinability, ISI Special Report, Vol. 94, pp. 11–18, 1967. Wright, P. K. and Trent, E. M., “Metallurgical Appraisal of Wear Mechanisms and Processes on High Speed Tools,” Metals Technology, Vol. 6, pp. 13–23, 1974. Doyle, E. D., Horne, J. G. and Tabor, D., “Frictional Interactions between Chip and Rake Face in Continuous Chip Formation,” Proc. of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 366, pp. 173–187, 1979. Horne, J. G., Doyle, E. D. and Tabor, D., “Direct Observation of Chip-Tool Interface in Metal Cutting,” Proc. of the Fifth North American Metalworking Research Conference, pp. 237–240, 1977. Madhavan, V., Chandrasekar, S. and Farris, T. N., “Direct Observation of the Chip-Tool Interface in the Low-Speed Cutting of Pure Metals,” ASME Journal of Tribology, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 617–626, 2002. Ackroyd, B., Chandrasekar, S. and Compton, W. D., “A Model for the Contact Condition at the Chip-Tool Interface in Machining,” ASME Journal of Tribology, Vol. 125, No. 3, pp. 649–660, 2003. Lee, S., Hwang, J., Shankar, M. R., Chandrasekar, S. and Compton, W. D., “Large Strain Deformation Field in Machining,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 1633–1643, 2006. Gnanamanickam, E. P., Lee, S., Sullivan, J. P. and Chandrasekar, S., “Direct Measurement of Large-Strain Deformation Fields by Particle Tracking,” Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 1–12, 2009. Materials Evaluation and Engineering, Inc., “Handbook of Analytical Methods for Materials,” pp. 29–30, 2010. Narayanan, V., “Direct Measurement of Temperature in Machining,” M.S. Thesis, School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, 2000. Evans, J. H. and Speckhart, F. H., “Experimental Study of the Stress-Strain Properties of Lead under Specified Impact Conditions,” Proc. of Pressure Vessels and Piping-Materials-Nuclear Conference, pp. 1–26, 1974.