Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Luật tiêu dùng: Phản ứng chủ động hay thụ động đối với chủ nghĩa tiêu dùng?
Tóm tắt
Sự gia tăng số lượng và tốc độ phát triển của các luật tiêu dùng mới đòi hỏi phải đánh giá các luật hiện hành. Bài báo này tóm tắt và phân loại chi tiết tác động của một số điều luật tiêu dùng đến quá trình ra quyết định của người tiêu dùng. Một mục tiêu ngầm định của bài báo là cung cấp một góc nhìn cho việc xây dựng chính sách công trong tương lai. Các điều luật được đánh giá trong bài báo bao gồm: (1) giá đơn vị; (2) nhãn sản phẩm; và (3) công khai các điều khoản lãi suất cho tín dụng tiêu dùng. Tác động của những điều luật này là rất nhỏ, cho thấy sự cần thiết của một chương trình giáo dục dành cho người tiêu dùng.
Từ khóa
#Luật tiêu dùng #Tác động pháp luật #Ra quyết định của người tiêu dùng #Chính sách công #Giá đơn vị #Nhãn sản phẩm #Tín dụng tiêu dùngTài liệu tham khảo
Asam, E. and Bucklin, L., “Nutritional Labeling for Canned Goods: A Study of Consumer Response,” Journal of Marketing, 37 (April, 1973), 32–37.
Barksdale, H. and Darden, W., “Consumer Attitudes Toward Marketing and Consumerism,” Journal of Marketing, 36 (October, 1972), 28–35.
Block, C., Schooler, R., and Erickson, D., “Consumer Reaction to Unit Pricing: An Empirical Study,” Mississippi Valley Journal of Business and Economics, 7 (Winter, 1971-72), 36–46.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, “The 1970 Survey of Consumer Awareness of Finance Charges and Interest Rates”, in R. Gaedeke and W. Etcheson, eds., Consumerism (San Francisco: Canfield Press, 1972), 215–19.
Business Week, “Chains Woo Consumers with Open Dating,” (January, 16, 1971), 48.
Buskirk, R. and Rothe, J., “Consumerism—An Interpretation,” Journal of Marketing, 34 (October, 1970), 61–65.
Carman, J., “A Summary of Empirical Research on Unit Pricing in Supermarkets,” Journal of Retailing, 48 (Winter, 1972-73, 63–71.
Consumer Credit Protection Act. Public Law No. 90-321. 1968.
Consumer Reports, “Food Dating: Now You See It, Now You Don't,” (June, 1972), 391.
Consumer Reports, “What's Happened to Truth-in-Packaging?” (January, 1969), 40–43.
Fair Packaging and Labeling Act. Public Law No. 89-755. 1966.
Friedman, M., “Consumer Price Comparisons of Retail Products: The Role of Packaging and Pricing Practices and the Implications for Consumer Legislation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 56 (December, 1972), 439–46.
Friedman, M., “Consumer Confusion in the Selection of Supermarket Products,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 50 (December, 1966), 529–34.
French, W. and Schroeder, L., “Package Information Legislation: Trends and Viewpoints,” MSU Business Topics, 20 (Summer, 1972), 39–44.
Granger, C. and Billson, H., “Consumers' Attitudes Toward Package Size and Price,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (August, 1972), 239–48.
Gorman, W., “Shopper Response to Food Additive Dangers,” unpublished paper, School of Business, University of Tennessee, Martin, 197973.
Houston, M., “The Effect of Unit-Pricing on Choices of Brand and Size in Economic Shopping,” Journal of Marketing, 36 (July, 1972), 51–59.
Isakson, H. and Maurizi, A., “The Consumer Economics of Unit Pricing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (August, 1973), 277–85.
Kotler, P., “What Consumerism Means for Marketers,” Harvard Business Review, (May/June, 1972), 48–52.
Lamont, L. and Rothe, J., “The Impact of Unit Pricing on Channel Systems”, Proceedings of the Spring and Fall Conference of the American Marketing Association, 1971, 653–58.
Lamont, L., Rothe, J. and Slater, C., “Unit Pricing: A Positive Response to Consumerism,” European Journal of Marketing 6 (Winter, 1972), 223–33.
Lenahan, R., Thomas, J., Taylor, D., Call, D., and Padberg, D., “Consumer Reaction to Nutritional Labels on Food Products,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 7 (Summer, 1973), 1–12.
Lenahan, R., Thomas, J., Taylor, D., Call, D., and Padberg, D., Consumer Reaction to Nutritional Labels on Food Products, Search Agriculture, 1972.
McCullough, T., and Padberg, D., “Unit Pricing in Supermarkets: Alternatives, Costs, and Consumer Reaction,” Search Agriculture, 1971.
Mandell, L., “Knowledge and Understanding of Consumer Credit,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 7 (Summer, 1973), 23–36.
Mandell, L., “Consumer Perception of Incurred Interest Rates: An Empirical Test of the Efficiency of the Truth-in-Lending Law,” Journal of Finance, 26 (December 1971), 1143–53.
Monroe, B., and LaPlaca, P., “What Are the Benefits of Unit Pricing? Journal of Marketing, 36 (July, 1972), 16–22.
Mueller, W., “An Appraisal of Unit Pricing,” Progressive Grocer, (October, 1971), 6 ff.
O'Conner, T., “Consumer Shopping Behavior in the Acquisition of Financing for New Automobile Purchases in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama, Before and After the Implementation of the Consumer Credit Protection Act of 1968. Abstract from the Southern Journal of Business, 7 (May, 1970), 94.
Ross, I., “Consumer Information”, paper presented at the National Conference on Social Marketing, 1972.
Smelser, N.: Theory of Collective Behavior (New York: The Free Press, 1963), 23–26.
Stern, L., “Consumer Protection Via Self-Regulation,” Journal of Marketing, 35 (July, 1971), 47–53.
Stern, L., “Consumer Protection Via Increased Information,” Journal of Marketing, 31 (April, 1967), 48–52.
Stokes, R., and Haddock, R., “Interim Report of the First Two Phases of the CRI/FDA Nutritional Labeling Research Program,” Consumer Research Institute, August, 1972.
Thompson, J., “Consumer Awareness of Products Requiring Caution Labels,” Abstract from the Southern Journal of Business, 7 (November, 1972), 153.
Walker, O., Sauter, R. and Ford, N., “The Potential Secondary Effects of Consumer Legislation: A Conceptual Framework”, Journal of Consumer Affairs (forthcoming).
Warland, R. and Herrman, R., “The New Wave of Imitation Foods: Problems Ahead?” Journal of Consumer Affiars, 5 (Summer, 1971), 56–69.
Weiss, E., “Marketers Fiddle While Consumers Burn,” Harvard Business Review, 46 (July–August, 1968), 45–52.
