Consumer Responses to Rumors: Good News, Bad News

Journal of Consumer Psychology - Tập 6 - Trang 165-187 - 1997
Michael A. Kamins1, Valerie S. Folkes1, Lars Perner1
1Department of Marketing, University of Southern California

Tóm tắt

Three studies—a field survey and two experiments—examine social and situational factors influencing the evaluation and communication of information labeled as rumor. The survey focused on rumor transmission and beliefs about marketplace rumors held by the public. Consumers reported that they were exposed to and spread more negative than positive rumors. Additionally, rumor, when identified as such, was evaluated less favorably than other word‐of‐mouth communications. These findings were then examined in greater depth in two experiments that compared the interpersonal consequences of transmission of negative and positive rumors. The first experimental study revealed that labeling information as a rumor decreased its credibility and transmission to others and that positively valenced rumors were more likely to be transmitted and generated greater liking for the transmitter. Study 3 revealed that the personal relevance of the information interacted with valence to influence rumor transmission, affective reactions, and interpersonal attraction. There was a greater propensity to spread positive rumors that reflected well on oneself compared to negative rumors that reflected badly. In contrast, negative rumor about one's rival was more likely to be transmitted than positively valenced rumor. Rumor valence did not influence transmission when the information concerned a remote other.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allport G.W., 1947, The psychology of rumor 10.1086/209118 10.1016/S0019-9958(58)90219-5 Churchill V. B. (1988 Summer). Learning to live with continuing household panels.Telenation Reports p. 2. 10.1002/mar.4220040105 10.1086/209141 10.1086/209086 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90050-6 10.1086/209355 10.2307/3151364 10.1037/10628-000 10.1086/208570 Higgins E.T., 1981, Social cognition: The Ontario symposium, Vol. 1, 343 Hupfer N.T., 1971, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, 262 10.1002/mar.4220080303 10.1086/269167 Kapferer J.N., 1990, Rumors Katz E., 1955, Personal influence 10.1086/265665 10.1016/0167-4870(92)90058-F 10.1086/208925 10.2307/3151813 10.2307/3203428 10.1037/0033-2909.87.3.578 10.1037/0003-066X.46.5.484 Summers J.O., 1971, Combined Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Series No. 33, 428 Swan J.E., 1989, Postpurchase communications by consumers, Journal of Retailing, 65, 516 TARP Inc. (1985).Consumer complaint behavior in America: An update study. Washington DC: United States Office of Consumer Affairs. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60251-8 10.2307/3151315 Voss P. Jr. (1984 May 17). Status shifts to peer influence.Advertising Age p. M–10. 10.1080/00913367.1981.10672781 10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1 10.1037/0003-066X.48.9.957 10.1037/h0030466
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Consumer Psychology

Tập 6

165-187

Thông tin tác giả