Considerations for using race and ethnicity as quantitative variables in medical education research

Paula T. Ross1, T. Hart-Johnson1, Sally A. Santen2, Nikki L. Bibler Zaidi1
1University of Michigan—Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
2Virginia Commonwealth School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA

Tóm tắt

Throughout history, race and ethnicity have been used as key descriptors to categorize and label individuals. The use of these concepts as variables can impact resources, policy, and perceptions in medical education. Despite the pervasive use of race and ethnicity as quantitative variables, it is unclear whether researchers use them in their proper context. In this Eye Opener, we present the following seven considerations with corresponding recommendations, for using race and ethnicity as variables in medical education research: 1) Ensure race and ethnicity variables are used to address questions directly related to these concepts. 2) Use race and ethnicity to represent social experiences, not biological facts, to explain the phenomenon under study. 3) Allow study participants to define their preferred racial and ethnic identity. 4) Collect complete and accurate race and ethnicity data that maximizes data richness and minimizes opportunities for researchers’ assumptions about participants’ identity. 5) Follow evidence-based practices to describe and collapse individual-level race and ethnicity data into broader categories. 6) Align statistical analyses with the study’s conceptualization and operationalization of race and ethnicity. 7) Provide thorough interpretation of results beyond simple reporting of statistical significance. By following these recommendations, medical education researchers can avoid major pitfalls associated with the use of race and ethnicity and make informed decisions around some of the most challenging race and ethnicity topics in medical education.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Davis J. Reconsidering the use of race as an explanatory variable in program evaluation. New Dir Program Eval. 1992;53:55–67.

Wilkinson D, King G. Conceputal and methodological issues in the use of race as a variable: policy implications. Milbank Quart. 1987;65(Suppl 1):56–71.

Blake-Kelly K, Garrison N, Fletcher F, et al. Rationales for expanding minority physican respresentation in the workforce: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2018;52(9):925–35.

Terrell C, Beaudreau J. 3000 by 2000 and beyond: Next steps for promoting diversity in the health professions. J Dent Educ. 2003;67(9):1048–52.

Sklar D. New conversations: justice, disparities, and meeting the needs of our most vulnerable populations. Acad Med. 2017;92(11):1506–7.

Capers Q, Clinchot D, McDougle L. Implicit racial bias in medical school admissions. Acad Med. 2017;92(3):365–9.

Karani R, Varpio L, May W, et al. Racism and bias in health professions education. How educators, faculty developers and researchers can make a difference. Acad Med. 2017;92(11S):S1–S6.

Smedley A, Smedley B. Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real. Am Psychol. 2005;60(1):16–26.

Manly J. Deconstructing race and ethnicity. Implications for measurement for health outcomes. Med Care. 2006;44(Suppl 3):S10–S6.

Association of Amerian Medical Colleges (AAMC). Race/ethnicity responses (alone and in combination) of applicants to U.S. medical schools. 2019. https://www.aamc.org/system/files/2019-11/2019_FACTS_Table_A-14.1.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2020.

Kaplan J, Bennett T. Use of race and ethnicity in biomedical publication. JAMA. 2003;289(20):2709–16.

Neal K. Not by proxy: arguments for improving the use of race in biomedical research. Am J Bioeth. 2017;17(9):52–4.

Fontanarosa P, Bauchner H. Race, ancestry, and medical research. JAMA. 2018;320(15):1539–40.

Burchard E, Ziv E, Coyle N, Gomez S, Tang H, Karter AJ, et al. The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(12):1170–5.

Hasselkus B. The use of “race” in research. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:127–9.

Jones C, LaVeist T, Lillie-Blanton M. “Race” in the epidemiologic literature: An examination of the Amerian Journal of Epidemiology, 1921–1990. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134(10):1079–84.

LaVeist T. Beyond dummy variable and sample selection: what health services researchers ought to know about race as a variable. Health Serv Res. 1994;29(1):1–16.

Lee C. “Race” and “ethnicity” in biomedical research: How do scientists construct and explain differences in health? Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(6):1183–90.

Ford M, Kelly P. Conceptualizing and categorizing race and ethnicity in health services research. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(5):1658–75.

Rabin R. The use of race as a variable in public health research. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:783.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health. The national Cultually and linguistically appropriate services (CLAS) standards. 2018. https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=2&lvlid=53. Accessed 18 Mar 2020.

Bonham V, Green E, Perez-Stable E. Examining how race, ethnicity and ancestry data are used in biomedical research. JAMA. 2018;320(15):1529–31.

Dirette D. Questions about race as a research variable. Open J Occup Ther. 2014; https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1122.

Lewis A, Forman T. Race, ethnicity and disciplinary divides: What is the path forward? Ethn Racial Stud. 2017;40(13):2218–25.

Cooper R, Nadkarni G, Ogedegbe G. Race, ancestry, and reporting in medical journals. JAMA. 2018;320(15):1529–33.

Jencks C. Racial bias in testing. In: Jencks C, Phillips C, editors. The Black White test score gap. Washington: Brookings Institution; 1998. pp. 55–85.

Helms J. Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing. Am Psychol. 1992;47(9):1083–101.

Mouscou S, Anderson M, Kaplan J, Valencia L. Valdity of racial/ethnic classification in medical resources data: an exploratory study. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(7):1084–6.

Adler E, Clark R. How it’s done. An invitation to social research. 2nd ed. Belmont: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning; 2003.

Lopez A. Collecting and tabulating race/ethnicity data with diverse and mixed heritage populations: a case-study with U.S. high school students. Ethn Racial Stud. 2003;26(5):931–61.

U.S. Census Bureau. Overview of the race and hispanic orgin. 2001. https://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/cenbr01-1.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2020.

Phinney J, Ong A. Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: current status and future directions. J Couns Psychol. 2007;54(3):271–81.

Pedhazur E, Kerlinger F. A numerical example of a variable with multiple categories. In: Pedhazur E, editor. Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Rinehart and Winston; 1973. pp. 279–89.

Perea J. The black/white binary paradigm of race: the “normal science” of American racial thought. Calif Law Rev. 1997;85(5):1213–58.

Fernandez T, Godwin A, Doyle J, Verdin D, Boone H. More comprehensive and inclusive approches to demographic data collection. Lafayette: West; 2016.

National Association of Health Data Organizations. Statistical approaches for small numbers: addressing reliability and disclosure risk. Salt Lake City: The National Association of Health Data Organizations (NAHDO); 2004.

Myers D, Levy M. Racial population projections and reactions to alternative news accounts of growing diversity. Ann Am Acad Politics Soc Sci. 2018;677(1):215–28.

Liebler C, Halpern-Manners A. A practical approach to using multiple-race response data: a bridging method for public-use microdata. Demography. 2008;45(1):143–55.

Royston P, Altman D, Sauerbrei W. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Statist Med. 2006;25(1):127–41.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Defining categorization needs for race and ethnicity data. Race, ethnicity, and language data: standardization for health care quality improvement. 2018. https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/iomracereport/reldata3.html. Accessed 29 Mar 2020.

U.S. Census Bureau. Race & ethnicity. 2020. https://www.census.gov/mso/www/training/pdf/race-ethnicity-onepager.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2020.

Altman D, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ. 2006;332(7529):1080.

Parker J, Makuc D. Methodologic implications of allocating multiple-race data to single-race categories. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(1):201–13.

Austin P, Brunner LJ. Inflation of the type I error rate when a continuous confounding variable is categorized in logistic regession analyses. Statist Med. 2004;23(7):1159–78.

Association of Amerian Medical Colleges (AAMC). Underrepresented in Medicine Definition. 2020. https://www.aamc.org/what-we-do/mission-areas/diversity-inclusion/underrepresented-in-medicine. Accessed 22 June 2020.

Mateos P, Singleton A, Longley P. Uncertainty in the analysis of ethnicity classifications: Issues of extent and aggregation of ethnic groups. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2009;35(9):1437–60.

Simpson S. Creating a data analysis plan: what to consider when choosing statistics for a study. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015;68(4):311–7.