Connecting Science and Mathematics: The Nature of Scientific and Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Tóm tắt
Confusion persists concerning the roles played by scientific hypotheses and predictions in doing science. This confusion extends to the nature of scientific and statistical hypothesis testing. The present paper utilizes the If/and/then/Therefore pattern of hypothetico-deductive (HD) reasoning to explicate the nature of both scientific and statistical hypothesis testing. The central example is that of Gregor Mendel’s test his theory of inheritance and the use of the chi-square statistic to determine the extent to which his predicted and experimental results match. When the processes of scientific and statistical hypothesis testing are cast in HD terms, we find that both involve hypotheses, planned tests, predictions, results and conclusions. However, the former involves causal claims, while the latter is descriptive. Importantly, connecting the two processes reveals that scientific predictions and statistical hypotheses are the same thing. Improved understanding of the similarities and differences of the two processes and their connected role in doing science can be expected to improve general scientific and mathematical literacy. It may also improve the quality of research in science and mathematics education.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akerson, V.L., Morrison, J.A. & McDuffie, A.R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194–213.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Project 2061: Science for All Americans. Washington, D.C.
Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., Pittalis, M. & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2004). Proofs through exploration in dynamic geometry environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 339–352.
Dass, P.M. (2005). Understanding the nature of scientific enterprise (NOSE) through a discourse with its history: The influence of an undergraduate ‘history of science’ course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3(1), 87–115.
Glass, G.V. & Stanley, J.C. (1970). Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Glass, G.V. & Hopkins, K.D. (1996). Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology. (3rd Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Hempel, C. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kinraide, T.B. & Denison, R.F. (2003). Strong inference: The way of science. The American Biology Teacher, 65(6), 419–424.
Lawson, A.E. (2004). The nature and development of scientific reasoning: A synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 307–338.
Lawson, A.E. (2005). What is the role of induction and deduction in reasoning and scientific inquiry? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 716–740.
Lawson, A.E. (2007). How “Scientific” is Science Education Research? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching. New Orleans, LA, April.
Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.
Lewis, R.W. (1988). Biology: A hypothetico-deductive science. The American Biology Teacher, 50(6), 362–367.
Lin, F.L., Yang, K.L. & Chen, C.Y. (2004). The features and relationships of reasoning, proving and understanding proof in number patterns. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 227–256.
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
McComas, W.F. (2003). A textbook case of the nature of science: Laws and theories in the science of biology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 141–155.
McComas, W.F. & Olson, J. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McPherson, G.R. (2001). Teaching and Learning the Scientific Method. The American Biology Teacher, 63(4), 242–245.
Mendel, G. (1865). Versuche über pflanzen-hybriden. Verhandlungen des Naturforschernden Vereines im Brunn 4, 3–47. (For an English translation see Stern & Sherwood, (1966). The Origins of Genetics: A Mendel Source Book. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Research Council. (1995). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Oehrtman, M. & Lawson, A.E. (2007). Connecting science and mathematics: The nature of proof and disproof in science and mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education (in press).
Walker, H.M. (1958). The contributions of Karl Pearson. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(281), 11–22.