Conflict, arbitration, and dispute resolution in the German workplace

Emerald - Tập 18 Số 2 - Trang 175-192 - 2007
MartinBehrens1
1Institute for Economic and Social Research (WSI)/Hans‐Boeckler Foundation, Duesseldorf, Germany

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis paper investigates the role of arbitration panels in German employment relations. It is the main aim of the analysis to improve our knowledge of the ways through which employment related conflict is formalized within a transparent procedure.Design/methodology/approachHypotheses are generated from a review of relevant publications on German arbitration panels. To test the hypotheses with evidence, the paper uses data from the 2006 WSI works council survey and applies binary logistical regression analysis.FindingsThe statistical analysis reveals that works councils oppose management hostility by way of making more frequent use of arbitration panels. While in a multivariate model the use of arbitration panels could be positively associated with certain attitudes of works councils and management, results for a number of institutional variables were other than expected. While foreign ownership of a particular establishment did not have a significant impact on the use of arbitration panels, firm‐level agreements, as negotiated by unions without the direct involvement of works councils, are associated with a more frequent use of such panels.Research limitations/implicationsThe model applied in the article could not verify establishment age because data on this subject was not available. Future surveys should fill this void.Practical implicationsThe findings of this paper suggest that arbitration panels are a valuable tool in the process of conflict resolution. Because there is little evidence for an excessive use of such panels, future debates on the reform of the Works Constitution Act should consider strengthening this instrument rather than restricting it.Originality/valueWhile data on the use of arbitration panels had already been documented about 20 years ago, the author presents a unique set of data, which for the first time allows the analysis of the use of arbitration panels in all industries within the private sector and is also significant in making it possible to statistically test relevant hypotheses on the usage of such panels.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Addison, J.T., Schnabel, C. and Wagner, J. (2000), “Nonunion representation in Germany”, in Kaufman, B.E. and Taras, D.G. (Eds), Nonunion Employee Representation. History, Contemporary Practice, and Policy, M.E. Shape, Armonk, NY and London, pp. 365‐85.

Behrens, M. and Kädtler, J. (2006), “Die Rolle des Managements bei der betrieblichen Restrukturierung”, WSI‐Mitteilungen, Vol. 59 No. 11, pp. 609‐16.

Bellmann, L. and Ellguth, P. (2006), “Verbreitung von Betriebsräten und ihr Einfluss auf die betriebliche Weiterbildung”, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Vol. 226 No. 5, pp. 487‐504.

Bispinck, R. (2006), “Abschied vom Flächentarifvertrag? Der Umbruch in der deutschen Tariflandschaft”, in WSI (Ed.), Tarifhandbuch 2006, Bund Verlag, Frankfurt, pp. 41‐66.

Bonacker, T. (2005), “Sozialwissenschaftliche Konflikttheorien – Einleitung und Überblick”, in Bonacker, T. (Ed.), Sozialwissenschaftliche Konflikttheorien. Eine Einführung, 3rd ed, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp. 9‐29.

Bosch, A., Ellguth, P., Schmidt, R. and Trinczek, R. (1999), Betriebliches Interessenhandeln, Band 1, Zur politischen Kultur der Austauschbeziehungen zwischen Management und Betriebsrat in der westdeutschen Industrie, Leske + Budrich Opladen.

Colvin, A.J. (2003), “Institutional pressures, human resource strategies, and the rise of nonunion dispute resolution procedures”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 375‐92.

Coser, L. (1972), Theorie sozialer Konflikte, Luchterhand, Neuwied and Berlin.

Dahrendorf, R. (1959), Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

Dahrendorf, R. (1967), Industrie‐ und Betriebssoziologie, 4th ed, de Gruyter, Berlin.

Dilger, A. (2002), Ökonomik betrieblicher Mitbestimmung. Die wirtschaftlichen Folgen von Betriebsräten, Rainer Hampp Verlag, Munich and Mehring.

Dilger, A. (2006), “Kooperation zwischen Betriebsrat und Management”, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Vol. 226 No. 5, pp. 562‐87.

Edwards, P. (1999), “Konflikt und Kooperation: Die Organisation der industriellen Beziehungen im Betrieb”, in Müller‐Jentsch, W. (Ed.), Konfliktpartnerschaft. Akteure und Institutionen der industriellen Beziehungen, 3rd ed., Rainer Hampp Verlag, Munich and Mehring, pp. 31‐55.

Ellguth, P. and Kohaut, S. (2005), “Tarifbindung und betriebliche Interessenvertretung: Aktuelle Ergebnisse aus dem IAB‐Betriebspanel”, WSI‐Mitteilungen, Vol. 58 No. 7, pp. 398‐403.

Faust, M. (2005), “Managementberatung in der Organisationsgesellschaft”, in Jäger, W. and Schimank, U. (Eds), Organisationsgesellschaft. Facetten und Perspektiven, Hagener Studientexter zur Soziologie, VS, Opladen, pp. 529‐88.

Frege, C.M. (2002), “A critical assessment of the theoretical and empirical research on German works councils”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 221‐48.

Jirjahn, U. and Smith, S.C. (2006), “What factors lead management to support or oppose employee participation – with and without works councils? Hypotheses and evidence from Germany”, Industrial Relations, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 650‐80.

Kliemt, H. (1986), Antagonistische Kooperation. Elementare spieltheoretische Modelle spontaner Ordnungsentstehung, Alber Karl, Freiburg and Munich.

Knuth, M., Büttner, R. and Schank, G. (1984), Zustandekommen und Analyse von Betriebsvereinbarungen und praktische Erfahrungen mit Einigungsstellen, Institut für Sozialforschung und Sozialwirtschaft e.V., Forschungsbericht im Auftrag des Bundesministers für Arbeit und Sozialordnung, Bonn.

Kochan, T.A., Katz, H.C. and McKersie, R.B. (1994), The Transformation of American Industrial Relations, ILR Press, Ithaca, NY.

Kotthoff, H. (2005), “Call me Barney”, in Faust, M., Funder, M. and Moldaschl, M. (Eds), Die Organisation der Arbeit, Rainer Hampp Verlag, Munich and Mehring, pp. 73‐107.

Kotthoff, H. (1994), Betriebsräte und Bürgerstatus. Wandel und Kontinuität betrieblicher Mitbestimmung, Rainer Hampp Verlag, Munich and Mehring.

Lewin, D. (1999), “Theoretical and empirical research on the grievance procedure and arbitration: a critical review”, in Eaton, A.E. and Keefe, J.H. (Eds), Employment Dispute Resolution and Worker Rights in the Changing Workplace, IRRA Series, IRRA, Champaign, IL, pp. 137‐86.

Massa‐Wirth, H. and Seifert, H. (2004), “Betriebliche Bündnisse für Arbeit mit begrenzter Reichweite?”, WSI‐Mitteilungen, Vol. 57 No. 5, pp. 246‐54.

Müller‐Jenstch, W. (1982), “Gewerkschaften als intermediäre Organisation”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft, Vol. 24, pp. 408‐32.

Müller‐Jentsch, W. (1991), “Technik als Rahmenbedingung und Gestaltungsoption industrieller Beziehungen”, in Müller‐Jentsch, W. (Ed.), Konfliktpartnerschaft. Akteure und Institutionen der industriellen Beziehungen, 1st ed., Rainer Hampp Verlag, Munich and Mehring, pp. 245‐73.

Müller‐Jentsch, W. (1999), “Vorwort”, in Müller‐Jentsch, W. (Ed.), Konfliktpartnerschaft. Akteure und Institutionen der industriellen Beziehungen, 3rd ed., Rainer Hampp Verlag, Munich and Mehring, pp. 7‐11.

Müller‐Jentsch, W. (2003), “Re‐assessing co‐determination”, in Müller‐Jentsch, W. and Weitbrecht, H. (Eds), The Changing Contours of German Industrial Relations, Rainer Hampp Verlag, Munich and Mehring, pp. 39‐56.

Oechsler, W. and Schönfeld, T. (1989), Die Einigungsstelle als Konfliktlösungsmechanismus. Eine Analyse der Wirkungsweise und Funktionsfähigkeit. Schriften zur Personalwirtschaft, Band 15, Kommentator Verlag, Neuwied and Frankfurt.

Parsons, T. (1945), “Racial and religious differences as factors in group tensions”, in Bryson, L., Finkelstein, L. and MacIver, R.M. (Eds), Approaches to National Unity, Harper, New York, NY, pp. 182‐99.

Rogers, J. and Streeck, W. (1995), “The study of works councils: concepts and problems”, in Rogers, J. and Streeck, W. (Eds), Works Councils. Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 3‐26.

Rössel, J. (2002), “Die klassische Konflikttheorie auf dem Prüfstand. Determinanten der Intensität und Gewaltsamkeit von sozialen Konflikten”, Swiss Journal of Sociology, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 47‐67.

Schmidt, R. and Trinczek, R. (1999), “Der Betriebsrat als Akteur der industriellen Beziehungen”, in Müller‐Jentsch, W. (Ed.), Konfliktpartnerschaft. Akteure und Institutionen der industriellen Beziehungen, 3rd ed., Rainer Hampp Verlag, Munich and Mehring, pp. 103‐28.

Schumann, M., Gerlach, F., Gschlössl, A. and Millhoffer, P. (1971), Am Beispiel der Septemberstreiks – Anfang der Rekonstruktionsperiode der Arbeiterklasse?, Europäische Verlagsanstalt, Frankfurt.

Sisson, K. (1987), The Management of Collective Bargaining: an International Comparison, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Turner, L. (1991), Democracy at Work. Changing World Markets and the Future of Labor Unions, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

Waddington, J. (2006), “The performance of European Works Councils in engineering: perspectives of employee representatives”, Industrial Relations, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 681‐708.

WSI (2006), Works Council Survey, Institute for Economic and Social Research, Dusseldorf.

Oechsler, W. and Kerzel, M. (1984), Die Bedeutung von Einigungsstellen im Rahmen der Betriebsverfassung – Empirische Analyse der Wirkungsweise und Funktionsfähigkeit von Einigungsstellenverfahren – Teil I. Theoretische Grundlagen, DBW‐Depot 86 – 4 – 4, C.E., Poeschel Verlag, Stuttgart.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 18 Số 2

175-192

Thông tin tác giả