Các biện pháp đánh giá kết quả cụ thể cho đau lưng dưới

European Spine Journal - Tập 13 - Trang 301-313 - 2004
U. Müller1, M. S. Duetz2, C. Roeder1, C. G. Greenough3
1Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
2Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
3Middlesbrough General Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK

Tóm tắt

Một đánh giá tài liệu về chín bảng hỏi tự đánh giá, cụ thể theo tình trạng, được sử dụng rộng rãi nhất cho đau lưng dưới đã được thực hiện. Các khía cạnh tổng quát và lịch sử, độ tin cậy, khả năng phản hồi và sự khác biệt lâm sàng tối thiểu quan trọng, tính hợp lệ bên ngoài, hiệu ứng sàn và trần, cũng như các ngôn ngữ có sẵn đã được phân tích cho chín công cụ đầu ra được sử dụng nhiều nhất. Khi xem xét biện pháp cụ thể theo tình trạng nào để sử dụng, cái nhìn tổng quan hiện tại về các công cụ đánh giá này nên cung cấp thông tin cần thiết để xác định các khía cạnh kỹ thuật của chín bảng hỏi. Tuy nhiên, các tiêu chí này chỉ là một phần trong các yếu tố cần xem xét. Trong phần II, cấu trúc của các thang đo này sẽ được đánh giá liên quan đến các miền đo lường.

Từ khóa

#đau lưng dưới #bảng hỏi tự đánh giá #công cụ đánh giá #độ tin cậy

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baker D, Pynsent P, Fairbank J (1989) The Oswestry Index revisited. In: Roland M, Jenner J (eds) Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, pp 174–86 Basler H, Jakle C, Kroner-Herwig B (1997) Incorporation of cognitive behavorial treatment into the medical care of chronic low back patients: a controlled randomized study in German pain treatment centers. Patient Educ Counsel 31:113–124 Beaton D (2000) Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine 25:3192–3199 Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ (1996) Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 65:71–76 Bigos SJ, Battie MC, Spengler DM, Fisher LD, Fordyce WE, Hansson TH, Nachemson AL, Wortley MD (1991) A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury. Spine 16:1–6 Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8:307–310 Bombardier C (2000) Outcome assessment in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders. Summary and general recommendations. Spine 25:3100–3103 Bombardier C (2000) Spine focus issue introduction. Spine 25:3097–3099 Boscainos P, Sapkas G, Stilianesi E (1999) Clinical relevance of specific parameters isolated within the Oswestry and Roland Morris functional disability index. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81 [Suppl]:239 Boscainos PJ, Sapkas G, Stilianessi E, Prouskas K, Papadakis SA (2003) Greek versions of the Oswestry and Roland–Morris disability questionnaires. Clin Orthop 40–53 Christensen TH, Bliddal H, Hansen SE, Jensen EM, Jensen H, Jensen R, Bay H (1993) Severe low-back pain. I: Clinical assessment of two weeks conservative therapy. Scand J Rheumatol 22:25–29 Cohen J (1977) Statistical power: analysis for the behavioural sciences. Academic, New York, pp 1–27 Coste J, Le Parc JM, Berge E, Delecoeuillerie G, Paolaggi JB (1993) [French validation of a disability rating scale for the evaluation of low back pain (EIFEL questionnaire)]. 60:335–341 Cronbach L (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334 Daltroy LH, Cats Baril WL, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Liang MH (1996) The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine 21:741–749 Davidson M, Keating JL (2002) A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 82:8–24 Deyo R, Centor R (1986) Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 39:897–906 Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23:2003–2013 Dionne CE, Koepsell TD, Von Korff M, Deyo RA, Barlow WE, Checkoway H (1997) Predicting long-term functional limitations among back pain patients in primary care settings. J Clin Epidemiol 50:31–43 Dionne CE, Von Korff M, Koepsell TD, Deyo RA, Barlow WE, Checkoway H (1999) A comparison of pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as outcome measures in back pain research. Spine 24:2339–2345 Dropsy R, Marty M (1994) Quality-of-life indexes for assessment of low-back-pain. Rev Rhum 61:S44–48 Euroquol Group (1990) Euroquol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Pol 16:199–208 Fairbank J (1995) Use of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Spine 20:1535–1537 Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–3 Fisher K, Johnson M (1997) Validation of the Oswestry low back pain questionnaire, its sensitivity as a measure of change following treatment and its relationship with other aspects of the chronic pain experience. Physiother Theory Pract 22:61–80 Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ (2001) A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther 81:776–788 Greenough CG, Fraser RD (1992) Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain. Spine 17:36–41 Grimby G, Smedby B (2001) ICF approved as the successor of ICIDH. J Rehabil Med 33:193–194 Gronblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P, Jarvinen E, Lukinmaa A, Kouri JP, Karaharju EO (1993) Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 9:189–195 Gronblad M, Jarvinen E, Hurri H, Hupli M, Karaharju EO (1994) Relationship of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) with three dynamic physical tests in a group of patients with chronic low-back and leg pain. Clin J Pain 10:197–203 Guillemin F, Constant F, Collin JF, Boulange M (1994) Short and long-term effect of spa therapy in chronic low back pain. Br J Rheumatol 33:148–151 Holt AE, Shaw NJ, Shetty A, Greenough CG (2002) The reliability of the Low Back Outcome Score for back pain. Spine 27:206–210 Hsieh CY, Phillips RB, Adams AH, Pope MH (1992) Functional outcomes of low back pain: comparison of four treatment groups in a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 15:4–9 Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 2:1127–1131 Johansson E, Lindberg P (1998) Subacute and chronic low back pain. Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire. Scand J Rehabil Med 30:139–143 Kahtri H, Greenough CG (2002) Minimum clinically important difference in the low back outcome score. Society of Back Pain Research, Leeds, UK Kopec JA, Esdaile JM (1995) Functional disability scales for back pain. Spine 20:1943–1949 Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, Abenhaim L, Wood Dauphinee S, Lamping DL, Williams JI (1995) The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties. Spine 20:341–352 Kosinski M, Zao S, Dedhiya S, Osterhaus J, Ware JJ (2000) Determine minimally important change in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 43(7):1478–1487 Kovacs FM, Llobera J, Gil Del Real MT, Abraira V, Gestoso M, Fernandez C, Primaria Group KA (2002) Validation of the Spanish version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Spine 27:538–542 Kucukdeveci AA, Tennant A, Elhan AH, Niyazoglu H (2001) Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain. Spine 26:2738–2743 Leclaire R, Blier F, Fortin L, Proulx R (1997) A cross-sectional study comparing the Oswestry and Roland–Morris functional disability scales in two populations of patients with low back pain of different levels of severity. Spine 22:68–71 Leung AS, Lam TH, Hedley AJ, Twomey LT (1999) Use of a subjective health measure on Chinese low back pain patients in Hong Kong. Spine 24:961–966 Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, Vinterberg H, Kreiner S, Jordan A (1994) Low back pain rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain. Pain 57:317–326 McDowell I, Newell C (1996) The theoretical and technical foundations of health measurement. Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford University Press, pp 10–42 Million R, Hall W, Nilsen KH, Baker RD, Jayson MI (1981) Assessment of the progress of the back-pain patient 1981 Volvo Award in Clinical Science. Spine 7:204–212 Nusbaum L, Natour J, Ferraz MB, Goldenberg J (2001) Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland–Morris questionnaire — Brazil Roland–Morris. Braz J Med Biol Res = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas / Sociedade Brasileira de Biofisica ... [et al.] 34:203–210 Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, Romanini E, Bondi R, Zanoli G, Campi A (2001) Cross-cultural adaptation of the lumbar North American Spine Society questionnaire for Italian-speaking patients with lumbar spinal disease. Spine 26:E344–347 Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ, Singer DE, Chapin A, Keller RB (1995) Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine 20:1899–1908; discussion 1909 Porst R (2000) Question wording—Zur Formulierung von Fragebogen-Fragen. ZUMA, Mannheim 2:1–11 Pose B, Sangha O, Peters A, Wildner M (1999) [Validation of the North American Spine Society Instrument for assessment of health status in patients with chronic backache]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 137:437–441 Roese I, Kohlmann T, Raspe H (1996) [Measuring functional capacity in backache patients in rehabilitation: a comparison of standardized questionnaires]. Rehabilitation 35:103–108 Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 25:3115–3124 Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144 Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care. Spine 8:145–150 Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Wardlaw D, Russell IT (1994) Developing a valid and reliable measure of health outcome for patients with low back pain. Spine 19:1887–1896 Schoppink LE, van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Beurskens SA, de Bie RA (1996) Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther 76:268–275 Steiner D, Normann G (1995) Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford Medical, 2nd edn. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Finch E, Gill C, Moreland J (1996) Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland–Morris questionnaire. Phys Ther 76:359–365; discussion 366–368 Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Gill C, Finch E (1994) Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 74:528–533 Stratford PW, Binkley JM (1997) Measurement properties of the RM-18. A modified version of the Roland–Morris Disability Scale. Spine 22:2416–2421 Sudman S, Bradburn N, Schwarz N (1996) Thinking about answers. The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Taylor SJ, Taylor AE, Foy MA, Fogg AJ (1999) Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain. Spine 24:1805–1812 Tubergen A van, Landewe R, Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Spoorenberg A, van der Heijde D, van der Tempel H, van der Linden S (2003) Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 62:140–145 Underwood MR, Barnett AG, Vickers MR (1999) Evaluation of two time-specific back pain outcome measures. Spine 24:1104–1112 Waddell G, Main CJ (1984) Assessment of severity in low-back disorders. Spine 9:204–208 Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483 Wiesinger GF, Nuhr M, Quittan M, Ebenbichler G, Wolfl G, Fialka Moser V (1999) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Roland–Morris questionnaire for German-speaking patients with low back pain. Spine 24:1099–1103 Yang Y, Eaton S, Maxwell M (1983) The relationship between the St. Thomas and Oswestry Disability Scores and the severity of low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 16:14–28 Zoega B, Karrholm J, Lind B (2000) Outcome scores in degenerative cervical disc surgery. Eur Spine J 9:137–143